Here's the scenario:
I intend to commute to school, September through April, in Winnipeg. We get lots of snow, put down
lots of sand and salt, and don't do a great job clearing the roads. I do not wish to use my
relatively expensive road bike for this task, so I'm seeking an inexpensive (sub$200) mountain bike
to use (I like the option of studded tires). My commuting destination has no proper bike lockup
area. Worst case, I will be locking the bike to a lamp post out of my view. The commute is between 8
and 9 miles each way.
I see three basic options: find a used beater, buy a new really cheap bike, buy a new low-end but
decent bike from an LBS. I have minimal skills as a wrench, but I'm motivated to learn as I will
have to do a fair bit of maintenance to get any bike through the winter here.
I've been to several garbage sales recently and have yet to see anything remotely worth buying.
Even the utter junk is overpriced ($30 for a rust bucket needing a new seat, new chain, new
peddles, new cables...). Finding one that fits me is also tough (29" inseam, 5'6" overall). I'm
concerned that I won't be able to find an acceptable beater or that the one I find will have
serious but hard to find damage.
I've been to several LBSs recently. Their low end bikes never seem to run below $700, well out of my
price range.
Several sporting goods stores sell cheapo bikes and at this time of year, they are discounted. Well
within my price range.
Now, I understand that a $700 bike is (or should be) much better than a $100 bike. And if I were
going to be running it down a mountain at breakneck speed, I'd want the best components I could
find. But I'm going to be riding in the city at 12-18 MPH with minimal hills. If a $100 bike lasts
me 3 months, that's still substantially cheaper than taking the bus.
So, my question for discussion is this: why should, or shouldn't, I go with the el cheapo bike?