Triathlon · Public discussion

Blue Devil's Demise

Started by John Hardt · · Last activity · 10 posts · 733 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Triathlon
Published
11 November 2005
Last activity
13 November 2005
Original author
John Hardt
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
733
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Sadly, it was announced today that the Blue Devil IM has been permanently
    cancelled. The race director's explanation is provided here:
    http://www.set-upinc.com/dukebluedevil/.

    Bill Scott and everyone at Set-Up do a fantastic job organizing their events
    and the Blue Devil was no exception. I would like to extend a public "thank
    you" to Bill for giving me a memory that will last a lifetime.

    John Hardt
    First-time IM finisher, Blue Devil 2004

  2. In article <[email hidden]>,

    John Hardt said:

    Sadly, it was announced today that the Blue Devil IM has been permanently
    cancelled. The race director's explanation is provided here:
    http://www.set-upinc.com/dukebluedevil/.

    I just don't get why everyone needs to do the "brand name" races. I'd do
    a generic, but it's actually cheaper for me to do a WTC race because
    there's one (Wisconsin) close to me.

    I had planned on doing Pineman this year before we moved, but that got
    cancelled as well (and they ran 1/2, 1/2, 3/4, and full ironman-distance
    races).

    So, can you legally say "Ironman-Distance Triathlon" on the event
    T-shirt if it's not a WTC race?

    --Harold Buck

    "I used to rock and roll all night,
    and party every day.
    Then it was every other day. . . ."
    -Homer J. Simpson

  3. "Harold Buck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    John Hardt said:

    Sadly, it was announced today that the Blue Devil IM has been permanently
    cancelled. The race director's explanation is provided here:
    http://www.set-upinc.com/dukebluedevil/.

    I just don't get why everyone needs to do the "brand name" races. I'd do
    a generic, but it's actually cheaper for me to do a WTC race because
    there's one (Wisconsin) close to me.

    I had planned on doing Pineman this year before we moved, but that got
    cancelled as well (and they ran 1/2, 1/2, 3/4, and full ironman-distance
    races).

    So, can you legally say "Ironman-Distance Triathlon" on the event
    T-shirt if it's not a WTC race?

    I think my 2004 BD shirt says "iron distance". Small letters, no "man". I
    think that's all they can get away with.

    I'm bummed because I had a blast at the Blue Devil. It's cancellation,
    combined with Pineman, means that for those of us in the Midwest the only
    thing that is left is IM Wisconsin and IM Lake Placid and they come with the
    requisite 12 month signup lead. (With only about 200 participants last
    year, I doubt the Chesepeakman will make it long-term).

    John

  4. In article <[email hidden]>,

    John Hardt said:

    I'm bummed because I had a blast at the Blue Devil. It's cancellation,
    combined with Pineman, means that for those of us in the Midwest the only
    thing that is left is IM Wisconsin and IM Lake Placid and they come with the
    requisite 12 month signup lead. (With only about 200 participants last
    year, I doubt the Chesepeakman will make it long-term).

    Well, it might if it picks up the people from those other races.

    Do you think the same thing would have happened in running if someone
    had the word "Marathon" trademarked?

    --Harold Buck

    "I used to rock and roll all night,
    and party every day.
    Then it was every other day. . . ."
    -Homer J. Simpson

  5. "Harold Buck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    John Hardt said:

    I'm bummed because I had a blast at the Blue Devil. It's cancellation,
    combined with Pineman, means that for those of us in the Midwest the only
    thing that is left is IM Wisconsin and IM Lake Placid and they come with
    the
    requisite 12 month signup lead. (With only about 200 participants last
    year, I doubt the Chesepeakman will make it long-term).

    Well, it might if it picks up the people from those other races.

    Do you think the same thing would have happened in running if someone
    had the word "Marathon" trademarked?

    Uh... probably. Hey Harold, how'd you like to go into business with me? We
    could start the World Marathon Corporation (WMC)...

    John

  6. Now that the m-dot brand has begun to drive the few remaining independents
    from ultra distance racing, they have set their sights on half-iron
    distances with their "70.3" series. Can you trademark a number?
    I'm worried they will kill off my favorite Gulf Coast Tri with the competing
    race in Orlando. I also worry about the few remaining independent iron
    races - for example the Great Floridian and the Silverman. I hope the
    Silverman has a roaring great success its first year and am looking forward
    to hearing about it. The few independent races are all that's left for
    those of us who may not be able to plan a year in advance - IMFlorida 2006
    sold out in three hours.
    Just my 2 cents.
    JJB

  7. "Harold Buck" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de news:
    [email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    John Hardt said:

    Sadly, it was announced today that the Blue Devil IM has been permanently
    cancelled. The race director's explanation is provided here:
    http://www.set-upinc.com/dukebluedevil/.

    I just don't get why everyone needs to do the "brand name" races. I'd do
    a generic, but it's actually cheaper for me to do a WTC race because
    there's one (Wisconsin) close to me.

    Well here in Europe the situation is quite different. The biggest event in
    Europe (Quelle Challenge Roth) is on ironman distance, but is not
    sanctionned by WTC. And the same goes for the hardest Ironman distance
    triathlon in the world, the Embrunman, in France. And nobody cares about not
    having "Ironman" written on its T-shirt. We don't like to mix business and
    sport like US people do.

    That will probably mean that triathlon in the USA and in the rest of the
    world will drift apart, more and more US triathletes going to WTC events,
    which are clearly focussed on the US (and AUS, NZ?) market (only people in
    the USA can understand the meaning of "70.3", "mile" meaning nothing for the
    rest of the world) while the rest of the world will go to ITU sanctionned
    events.

    Strange to see that it was USAT which convinced ITU not to sanction WTC
    races. They must feel more pressure to survive...

    -- Olivier

  8. "DrJoe" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Now that the m-dot brand has begun to drive the few remaining independents
    from ultra distance racing, they have set their sights on half-iron
    distances with their "70.3" series. Can you trademark a number?
    I'm worried they will kill off my favorite Gulf Coast Tri with the
    competing race in Orlando. I also worry about the few remaining
    independent iron races - for example the Great Floridian and the
    Silverman. I hope the Silverman has a roaring great success its first
    year and am looking forward to hearing about it. The few independent
    races are all that's left for those of us who may not be able to plan a
    year in advance - IMFlorida 2006 sold out in three hours.
    Just my 2 cents.
    JJB

    My humble opinion is that the Great Floridian and Vineman will live on for
    awhile if only because they both have a long history and (consequently)
    decent size fields. Most other non-WTC, iron-distance races are probably
    holding on by their fingernails and are probably doomed.

    The one thing I've never understood though is this: if the WTC has such a
    stranglehold on IM races and they sell out every race they hold in mere
    hours 12 months in advance, why only six races in North Americ? Why aren't
    they introducing more? Simple laws of supply and demand say that if you sell
    every bit of something you make you should either raise the price or make
    more of it. Why not an Ironman Ohio, Ironman Peoria, or Ironman Wherever.
    Seems pretty obvious they could sell out at least a couple more races per
    year if they wanted to.

    John

  9. In article <[email hidden]>,

    John Hardt said:

    The one thing I've never understood though is this: if the WTC has such a
    stranglehold on IM races and they sell out every race they hold in mere
    hours 12 months in advance, why only six races in North Americ? Why aren't
    they introducing more? Simple laws of supply and demand say that if you sell
    every bit of something you make you should either raise the price or make
    more of it. Why not an Ironman Ohio, Ironman Peoria, or Ironman Wherever.
    Seems pretty obvious they could sell out at least a couple more races per
    year if they wanted to.

    Yeah, but they must feel there's some value in keeping the demand high.
    I think they want to make sure they never have a race that doesn't sell
    out, and if they open up a few more, maybe AZ and CDA wouldn't sell out
    (since those are really slow to fill up--relatively speaking--as it is
    right now).

    --Harold Buck

    "I used to rock and roll all night,
    and party every day.
    Then it was every other day. . . ."
    -Homer J. Simpson

  10. "Harold Buck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    John Hardt said:

    The one thing I've never understood though is this: if the WTC has such a
    stranglehold on IM races and they sell out every race they hold in mere
    hours 12 months in advance, why only six races in North Americ? Why
    aren't
    they introducing more? Simple laws of supply and demand say that if you
    sell
    every bit of something you make you should either raise the price or make
    more of it. Why not an Ironman Ohio, Ironman Peoria, or Ironman
    Wherever.
    Seems pretty obvious they could sell out at least a couple more races per
    year if they wanted to.

    Yeah, but they must feel there's some value in keeping the demand high.
    I think they want to make sure they never have a race that doesn't sell
    out, and if they open up a few more, maybe AZ and CDA wouldn't sell out
    (since those are really slow to fill up--relatively speaking--as it is
    right now).

    Good point. Although in the case of IM Canada I would argue that it's slow
    to fill because there are 3 other IM's within about 250 miles of that race
    (IM Coeur d'Alene, Bigfoot, and Grand Columbian) the former of which is
    their own race. It's always seemed to me like they were competing with
    themselves on that one. It made more sense to me geographically when Coeur
    d'Alene was held in Salt Lake.

    John

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.