General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Pleomorphism

Started by john · · Last activity · 26 posts · 397 views

← Back to General fitness, health and nutrition

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

01 / Original postPleomorphismjohn · 1 Nov 2005 02 / This pagePosts 1–20Page 1 of 2 · chronological order 03 / Latest replyPost #26Mark Probert · 3 Nov 2005

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
1 November 2005
Last activity
3 November 2005
Original author
john
Posts
26
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
397
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 26
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Original post
    john
    Archived post
    #1

    http://www.whale.to/v/pleomorphism.htm

    Like Bechamp and Rife before him, Gaston states unequivocally, "germs are
    not the cause of, but the result of, disease". The Amazing Wonders of
    Gaston Naessens by Steven R. Elswick

    "Rife showed that by altering the environment and food supply, friendly
    bacteria such as colon bacillus could be converted into varied "pathogenic"
    bacteria. For example, Rife also observed that bacillus coli could in time
    be modified into the bacterial agent associated with typhus, and the process
    actually reversed. In Rife's words:

    In reality, it is not the bacteria themselves that produce the disease,
    but we believe it is . . . the unbalanced cell metabolism of the human body
    that in actuality produce the of disease. We also believe if the metabolism
    of the human body is perfectly balanced . . . it is susceptible to no
    disease.44

    This observation closely parallels Alexis Carrel's earlier research at the
    Rockefeller Institute where he was able to control the rates and levels of
    infectious disease mortality among mice. Beginning with the standard diet he
    observed a corresponding death rate of 52 percent. By making specific
    dietary improvements he was able to reduce mortality rates downward to 32
    percent, then 14 percent, and finally to a rate of 0.45 "----Dr. Raymond
    Obomsawin

    Report
  2. john
    Archived post
    #2

    http://www.whale.to/v/pleomorphism.htm

    Like Bechamp and Rife before him, Gaston states unequivocally, "germs are
    not the cause of, but the result of, disease". The Amazing Wonders of
    Gaston Naessens by Steven R. Elswick

    "Rife showed that by altering the environment and food supply, friendly
    bacteria such as colon bacillus could be converted into varied "pathogenic"
    bacteria. For example, Rife also observed that bacillus coli could in time
    be modified into the bacterial agent associated with typhus, and the process
    actually reversed. In Rife's words:

    In reality, it is not the bacteria themselves that produce the disease,
    but we believe it is . . . the unbalanced cell metabolism of the human body
    that in actuality produce the of disease. We also believe if the metabolism
    of the human body is perfectly balanced . . . it is susceptible to no
    disease.44

    This observation closely parallels Alexis Carrel's earlier research at the
    Rockefeller Institute where he was able to control the rates and levels of
    infectious disease mortality among mice. Beginning with the standard diet he
    observed a corresponding death rate of 52 percent. By making specific
    dietary improvements he was able to reduce mortality rates downward to 32
    percent, then 14 percent, and finally to a rate of 0.45 "----Dr. Raymond
    Obomsawin

    Report
  3. john
    Archived post
    #3

    http://www.whale.to/v/pleomorphism.htm

    Like Bechamp and Rife before him, Gaston states unequivocally, "germs are
    not the cause of, but the result of, disease". The Amazing Wonders of
    Gaston Naessens by Steven R. Elswick

    "Rife showed that by altering the environment and food supply, friendly
    bacteria such as colon bacillus could be converted into varied "pathogenic"
    bacteria. For example, Rife also observed that bacillus coli could in time
    be modified into the bacterial agent associated with typhus, and the process
    actually reversed. In Rife's words:

    In reality, it is not the bacteria themselves that produce the disease,
    but we believe it is . . . the unbalanced cell metabolism of the human body
    that in actuality produce the of disease. We also believe if the metabolism
    of the human body is perfectly balanced . . . it is susceptible to no
    disease.44

    This observation closely parallels Alexis Carrel's earlier research at the
    Rockefeller Institute where he was able to control the rates and levels of
    infectious disease mortality among mice. Beginning with the standard diet he
    observed a corresponding death rate of 52 percent. By making specific
    dietary improvements he was able to reduce mortality rates downward to 32
    percent, then 14 percent, and finally to a rate of 0.45 "----Dr. Raymond
    Obomsawin

    Report
  4. Vaccine-man
    Archived post
    #4

    Wow. This is about the dumbest thing I've ever heard. Why is it that if
    a person gets 10 mg of botulinum toxin they'll die?

    Report
  5. Vaccine-man
    Archived post
    #5

    Wow. This is about the dumbest thing I've ever heard. Why is it that if
    a person gets 10 mg of botulinum toxin they'll die?

    Report
  6. Vaccine-man
    Archived post
    #6

    Wow. This is about the dumbest thing I've ever heard. Why is it that if
    a person gets 10 mg of botulinum toxin they'll die?

    Report
  7. john
    Archived post
    #7

    Is that the normal disease process? Vaccine addicts like you must
    cling to the Pasteurian germ theory like rats to a floating corpse

    anyone with an iota of common sense (not you) can see the obvious
    http://www.whale.to/v/germ.htm

    Report
  8. john
    Archived post
    #8

    Is that the normal disease process? Vaccine addicts like you must
    cling to the Pasteurian germ theory like rats to a floating corpse

    anyone with an iota of common sense (not you) can see the obvious
    http://www.whale.to/v/germ.htm

    Report
  9. john
    Archived post
    #9

    Is that the normal disease process? Vaccine addicts like you must
    cling to the Pasteurian germ theory like rats to a floating corpse

    anyone with an iota of common sense (not you) can see the obvious
    http://www.whale.to/v/germ.htm

    Report
  10. TC
    Archived post
    #10
    Vaccine-man said:

    Wow. This is about the dumbest thing I've ever heard. Why is it that if
    a person gets 10 mg of botulinum toxin they'll die?

    Same reason people who injest too much cyanide die. But....

    What has that got to do with envoironmental pathogens and the human
    bodies ability to keep them in check when it is healthy and well-fed?

    TC

    Report
  11. TC
    Archived post
    #11
    Vaccine-man said:

    Wow. This is about the dumbest thing I've ever heard. Why is it that if
    a person gets 10 mg of botulinum toxin they'll die?

    Same reason people who injest too much cyanide die. But....

    What has that got to do with envoironmental pathogens and the human
    bodies ability to keep them in check when it is healthy and well-fed?

    TC

    Report
  12. TC
    Archived post
    #12
    Vaccine-man said:

    Wow. This is about the dumbest thing I've ever heard. Why is it that if
    a person gets 10 mg of botulinum toxin they'll die?

    Same reason people who injest too much cyanide die. But....

    What has that got to do with envoironmental pathogens and the human
    bodies ability to keep them in check when it is healthy and well-fed?

    TC

    Report
  13. Mark Probert
    Archived post
    #13
    TC said:
    Vaccine-man said:

    Wow. This is about the dumbest thing I've ever heard. Why is it that if
    a person gets 10 mg of botulinum toxin they'll die?

    Same reason people who injest too much cyanide die. But....

    What has that got to do with envoironmental pathogens and the human
    bodies ability to keep them in check when it is healthy and well-fed?

    I suppose that when I caugt falciparum malaria I was not healthy or well
    fed...

    Well...LRRP rations were not the epitome of epicurean delight, but, at
    the time, I was able to run through jungle carrying 60 lbs. of equipment
    and my weapons.

    Report
  14. Mark Probert
    Archived post
    #14
    TC said:
    Vaccine-man said:

    Wow. This is about the dumbest thing I've ever heard. Why is it that if
    a person gets 10 mg of botulinum toxin they'll die?

    Same reason people who injest too much cyanide die. But....

    What has that got to do with envoironmental pathogens and the human
    bodies ability to keep them in check when it is healthy and well-fed?

    I suppose that when I caugt falciparum malaria I was not healthy or well
    fed...

    Well...LRRP rations were not the epitome of epicurean delight, but, at
    the time, I was able to run through jungle carrying 60 lbs. of equipment
    and my weapons.

    Report
  15. Mark Probert
    Archived post
    #15
    TC said:
    Vaccine-man said:

    Wow. This is about the dumbest thing I've ever heard. Why is it that if
    a person gets 10 mg of botulinum toxin they'll die?

    Same reason people who injest too much cyanide die. But....

    What has that got to do with envoironmental pathogens and the human
    bodies ability to keep them in check when it is healthy and well-fed?

    I suppose that when I caugt falciparum malaria I was not healthy or well
    fed...

    Well...LRRP rations were not the epitome of epicurean delight, but, at
    the time, I was able to run through jungle carrying 60 lbs. of equipment
    and my weapons.

    Report
  16. HCN
    Archived post
    #16

    "john" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.whale.to/v/pleomorphism.htm

    Like Bechamp and Rife before him, Gaston states unequivocally, "germs are
    not the cause of, but the result of, disease". The Amazing Wonders of
    Gaston Naessens by Steven R. Elswick

    ...

    You need these!

    http://www.giantmicrobes.com/

    Report
  17. HCN
    Archived post
    #17

    "john" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.whale.to/v/pleomorphism.htm

    Like Bechamp and Rife before him, Gaston states unequivocally, "germs are
    not the cause of, but the result of, disease". The Amazing Wonders of
    Gaston Naessens by Steven R. Elswick

    ...

    You need these!

    http://www.giantmicrobes.com/

    Report
  18. MMu
    Archived post
    #18

    "john" <[email hidden]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.whale.to/v/pleomorphism.htm

    Like Bechamp and Rife before him, Gaston states unequivocally, "germs are
    not the cause of, but the result of, disease". The Amazing Wonders of
    Gaston Naessens by Steven R. Elswick

    "Rife showed that by altering the environment and food supply, friendly
    bacteria such as colon bacillus could be converted into varied
    "pathogenic"
    bacteria. For example, Rife also observed that bacillus coli could in time
    be modified into the bacterial agent associated with typhus, and the
    process
    actually reversed. In Rife's words:

    In reality, it is not the bacteria themselves that produce the disease,
    but we believe it is . . . the unbalanced cell metabolism of the human
    body
    that in actuality produce the of disease. We also believe if the
    metabolism
    of the human body is perfectly balanced . . . it is susceptible to no
    disease.44

    How come these things (pathogenic bacteria and their effects) work in cell
    culture then?
    Probably no other place where the metabolism can be more balanced than
    there.

    Report
  19. MMu
    Archived post
    #19

    "john" <[email hidden]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.whale.to/v/pleomorphism.htm

    Like Bechamp and Rife before him, Gaston states unequivocally, "germs are
    not the cause of, but the result of, disease". The Amazing Wonders of
    Gaston Naessens by Steven R. Elswick

    "Rife showed that by altering the environment and food supply, friendly
    bacteria such as colon bacillus could be converted into varied
    "pathogenic"
    bacteria. For example, Rife also observed that bacillus coli could in time
    be modified into the bacterial agent associated with typhus, and the
    process
    actually reversed. In Rife's words:

    In reality, it is not the bacteria themselves that produce the disease,
    but we believe it is . . . the unbalanced cell metabolism of the human
    body
    that in actuality produce the of disease. We also believe if the
    metabolism
    of the human body is perfectly balanced . . . it is susceptible to no
    disease.44

    How come these things (pathogenic bacteria and their effects) work in cell
    culture then?
    Probably no other place where the metabolism can be more balanced than
    there.

    Report
  20. Mark Probert
    Archived post
    #20
    HCN said:

    "john" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.whale.to/v/pleomorphism.htm

    Like Bechamp and Rife before him, Gaston states unequivocally, "germs are
    not the cause of, but the result of, disease". The Amazing Wonders of
    Gaston Naessens by Steven R. Elswick

    ...

    You need these!

    http://www.giantmicrobes.com/


    They make great learning tools for parents and educators, as well as
    amusing gifts for anyone with a sense of humor!

    John does not have a sense of humor.

    Report

Keep exploring

Browse the sectionGeneral fitness, health and nutrition Return to CyclingForumsStart at the home page Search discussionsFind another thread

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.