Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

cartridge hubs on euro racers?

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 28 posts · 748 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
21 October 2005
Last activity
24 October 2005
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
28
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
748
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 28
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. does lance et al. use ball and cone or cartridge hubs?

  2. And do they dress on the left or the right??

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    does lance et al. use ball and cone or cartridge hubs?

  3. Quoted message said:

    does lance et al. use ball and cone or cartridge hubs?

    They ride Dura Ace or Record, I would imagine. I don't think they care
    much whether it'scup/cone or cartridge.

    Jasper

  4. Quoted message said:

    does lance et al. use ball and cone or cartridge hubs?


    anyone that races mavic, and lots do, use cartridge. why do you ask?

  5. Jasper Janssen said:
    Quoted message said:

    does lance et al. use ball and cone or cartridge hubs?

    They ride Dura Ace or Record, I would imagine. I don't think they care
    much whether it'scup/cone or cartridge.


    Actually, I don't think they are using Dura Ace or Record hubs... most
    teams have specific wheel sponsers, and use fancy lightweight carbon
    rimmed wheels when they want to go fast. I'd wager that most of these
    use cartridge bearings. Discovery at least, also replaces wheels after
    a mere few hundred miles.

  6. Ron Ruff said:
    Jasper Janssen said:
    Quoted message said:

    does lance et al. use ball and cone or cartridge hubs?

    They ride Dura Ace or Record, I would imagine. I don't think they care
    much whether it'scup/cone or cartridge.

    Actually, I don't think they are using Dura Ace or Record hubs... most
    teams have specific wheel sponsers, and use fancy lightweight carbon
    rimmed wheels when they want to go fast. I'd wager that most of these
    use cartridge bearings. Discovery at least, also replaces wheels after
    a mere few hundred miles.

    Do you mean "replaces tubulars after a mere few hundred miles", isn't?
    ^^^^^^^^

  7. Francesco Devittori said:


    Do you mean "replaces tubulars after a mere few hundred miles", isn't?


    No... the whole wheel. This was from a TdF mechanic and was discussed
    on this NG this year. They avoid having to rebuild the bearings that
    way... or anything else for that matter. I think they were Bontrager
    wheels... part of the Trek brand.

    Actually, it makes sense... with millions at stake and limited time,
    why chance it?

    So... think twice before assuming that the pro's wheels would be good
    for you... unless you are ok with replacing them often.

  8. Ron Ruff said:

    Actually, I don't think they are using Dura Ace or Record hubs...

    It depends on what wheels they use. The hubs on Campagnolo wheels such
    as Eurus and Bora are, as far as I know, internally identical to
    Campagnolo Record hubs. Fulcrum wheels are more of the same.

    -as

  9. Quoted message said:

    does lance et al. use ball and cone or cartridge hubs?

    Bontrager are cart hubs, as are the Mavics. Campagnolo are cup and
    ball.

  10. Ron Ruff said:
    Jasper Janssen said:
    Quoted message said:

    does lance et al. use ball and cone or cartridge hubs?

    They ride Dura Ace or Record, I would imagine. I don't think they care
    much whether it'scup/cone or cartridge.


    Actually, I don't think they are using Dura Ace or Record hubs... most
    teams have specific wheel sponsers, and use fancy lightweight carbon
    rimmed wheels when they want to go fast. I'd wager that most of these
    use cartridge bearings. Discovery at least, also replaces wheels after
    a mere few hundred miles.

    No Ron is right. They change wheels after a few stages...to keep
    everything 'fresh'.

  11. Qui si parla Campagnolo said:


    Ron Ruff said:
    Jasper Janssen said:

    On 21 Oct 2005 09:20:38 -0700, [email hidden] wrote:

    >does lance et al. use ball and cone or cartridge hubs?

    They ride Dura Ace or Record, I would imagine. I don't think they care
    much whether it'scup/cone or cartridge.


    Actually, I don't think they are using Dura Ace or Record hubs... most
    teams have specific wheel sponsers, and use fancy lightweight carbon
    rimmed wheels when they want to go fast. I'd wager that most of these
    use cartridge bearings. Discovery at least, also replaces wheels after
    a mere few hundred miles.

    No Ron is right. They change wheels after a few stages...to keep
    everything 'fresh'.

    Are you guys saying a typcial Discovery Channel rider uses 25-50 pairs
    of wheels a year (say 90 race days) and the rest are discarded or
    sold by the team?

    No way.

    JT

    ****************************
    Remove "remove" to reply
    Visit http://www.jt10000.com
    ****************************

  12. Note that this was in the context of the TdF. I doubt they would toss
    wheels like that year round. I'd be curious whether these wheels wind
    up floating around on eBay in Europe.

    Anyway, it seems perfectly plausible to me. Trek pays for the wheels
    so the mechanics have zero incentive to save money.

  13. John Forrest Tomlinson said:

    Are you guys saying a typcial Discovery Channel rider uses 25-50 pairs
    of wheels a year (say 90 race days) and the rest are discarded or
    sold by the team?

    No way.

    90 race days? The Tour is only three weeks long. Discovery *only* race(d)
    the Tour, and so did US Postal before them.

    Jasper

  14. back to the factory

  15. given the different performance characteristics assumed during the last
    weeks cartridge discussion
    the following questions pop in
    frictionwise-is the B/C adjustable to beyond cartridge spec? or
    subjective handling performance?
    or does mechanics performance fall off adjusting multiple batches of
    B/C so much so the riders learn to distrust the B/C
    ie-adj 500 B/C is a huge PITA
    and the probability as mentioned enduro is enough and greater mil spec
    may not be streetable but greater mil spec can be TdF
    my head said a 100 miler is faster on a quality B/C adjustment (wheels
    cones spec?) but i get the answer in the TdF mass production not
    imagined

  16. Quoted message said:

    given the different performance characteristics assumed during the last
    weeks cartridge discussion
    the following questions pop in
    frictionwise-is the B/C adjustable to beyond cartridge spec? or
    subjective handling performance?
    or does mechanics performance fall off adjusting multiple batches of
    B/C so much so the riders learn to distrust the B/C
    ie-adj 500 B/C is a huge PITA
    and the probability as mentioned enduro is enough and greater mil spec
    may not be streetable but greater mil spec can be TdF
    my head said a 100 miler is faster on a quality B/C adjustment (wheels
    cones spec?) but i get the answer in the TdF mass production not
    imagined


    i think the majority of opinion is from those with a vested interest in
    trying to not look stupid in the face of their previous writings on
    these subjects, and/or from those who haven't bothered to do any
    technical investigation.

    as the owner of a pair of "high friction" mavic cartridge bearing
    wheels, i was expecting them to have higher rolling resistance to cup
    and cone wheels. but reality is, there's no such problem. i've done
    several coasting tests for both types and find them to be completely
    indiscernible from each other. i /do/ notice high friction when turning
    slowly in my hand, but also remember that the majority of the friction
    comes from the seals, not the races. and the seals ride on a layer of
    grease. /if/ the grease were to shift mode to hydrodynamic
    separation,[1] which is /not/ going on at hand-turning speed, then the
    friction would drop dramatically. perhaps one of our "engineers" will
    test rather than just give opinion.

    i say that all things considered, if the sealed bearings hold out in
    winter riding, they are the way to go because they are fully replaceable
    and offer much longer potential service intervals.

    [1] hydrodynamic separation of two surfaces sliding relative to one
    another is different to elasto-hydrodynamic separation experience by
    ball bearings at high speed. another example of hydrodynamic separation
    is the journal bearings on the crankshaft of a car engine. at rest, a
    car engine is high friction and hard to turn, but when running and the
    hydrodynamic layer has initiated, friction is very low.

  17. uh, is there an oath involved?
    a good seal would help. the front alivio went thru a long monsoon
    period this spring-70% washout of the finish line teflon with
    trojaneeeze after a passing aramadilo ate the seals. but in B/C, dirt
    has an escape path into the berm; with cartridge the escape route is
    barricaded by the race-one gets the coconut flakes disappearing into
    the choc pudding effect.
    a better seal is a good seal with cart bearings!
    your comment on subjectivity in the hand held bearing and the PITA
    number for race mechanics deafinitely steers the peliton into the cart
    b arena
    what's the breakdown at the crit?

  18. jim beam said:

    [1] hydrodynamic separation of two surfaces sliding relative to one
    another is different to elasto-hydrodynamic separation experience by
    ball bearings at high speed. another example of hydrodynamic separation
    is the journal bearings on the crankshaft of a car engine. at rest, a
    car engine is high friction and hard to turn, but when running and the
    hydrodynamic layer has initiated, friction is very low.

    It's a lot easier to turn with the head off, though, which suggests
    compression is not an insignificant contributor.

    Jasper

  19. or take the plugs out

  20. Jasper Janssen said:
    John Forrest Tomlinson said:

    Are you guys saying a typcial Discovery Channel rider uses 25-50 pairs
    of wheels a year (say 90 race days) and the rest are discarded or
    sold by the team?

    No way.

    90 race days? The Tour is only three weeks long. Discovery *only* race(d)
    the Tour, and so did US Postal before them.

    Jasper

    That may be the only event Armstrong cared much about, but Discovery
    entered a lot of other races. You might want to check what team the
    winner of the Giro d'Italia this year rode for.

    Dave Lehnen

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.