DavidR said:"Chris Eilbeck" <[email hidden]> wrote
Quoted message said:Mainly commuting, mostly on the flat but with the odd nasty uphill,
and the odd jaunt round the hills in Malvern (mostly on roads) and to
Worcester and back, also on roads.
You don't say what sort of bike you have. If it is an MTB have you
changed the tyres for something with less bulk and tread? That's the
first priority if you haven't.
Sorry. It's a road-rigged hardtail mtb with road tyres, rigid fork,
clipped pedals, mudguards and a decent set of lights.
Quoted message said:OK, the bars depend on whether you want to wind up the hills in a
low gear or get out of the saddle. The general reckoning for the
latter is to have a grip that allows you to have the arms
parallel. The ideal may actually be to reduce your bar width.
I can generally spin up most of the hills I need to climb, I rarely
get out of the saddle.
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Is it the overall width of the bar you are concerned with or the gap
between bar end and brake lever?
Primarily, yeah.
Umm. I offered a choice in that sentence...
Doh!
Quoted message said:It is probably best to slide everything along the bar rather than
reduce the length of the grip, seeing what riding you do.
I think I'll end up trashing the grips , they'll never slide along
after being on there as long as they have. Might not be a bad idea to
change them though, they're not the most comfy but I usually wear
gloves in any case.
Chris
--
Chris Eilbeck
MARS Flight Crew http://www.mars.org.uk/
UKRA #1108 Level 2 UYB
Tripoli UK Member #9527 LSMR