Taste Sensation!

Jimmy Tango said:

Luncheon Casserole

Is this maroon back again?

*plonk*

Brian

--
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

On Mon 10 Oct 2005 02:14:53p, Default User wrote in rec.food.cooking:

Quoted message said:

Jimmy Tango said:

Luncheon Casserole

Is this maroon back again?

*plonk*

Brian

Apparently he is. Are you kavetching again?

--
Wayne Boatwright *¿*
____________________________________________

Give me a smart idiot over a stupid genius any day.
Sam Goldwyn, 1882-1974

Wayne Boatwright said:

On Mon 10 Oct 2005 02:14:53p, Default User wrote in rec.food.cooking:

Quoted message said:

Jimmy Tango wrote:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Is this maroon back again?

Quoted message said:

Apparently he is. Are you kavetching again?

Are you?

Brian

--
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

"Jimmy Tango" <[email hidden] > wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Luncheon Casserole

1 10 1/2-oz can cream of chicken soup
1 cup milk
1 8-oz. pkg. wide noodles, cooked
1 12-oz can corned beef, cubed
1/4 lb. soft cheese
1/2 cup onion, chopped
3/4 cup buttered bread crumbs

Combine soup and milk. Layer remaining ingredients in casserole
reserving buttered bread crumbs for top. Pour soup mixture over top.
Sprinkle on bread crumbs. Bake at 350 degrees for 45 minutes.

This may be made with corned beef brisket which has been simmered at
home. Make up a New England boiled dinner with the tender corned beef
and the traditional vegetables cooked in the broth. Reserve broth and
chill leftover meat in this broth. Cook noodles for this casserole
recipe in the broth. Cube the corned beef and continue as directed.

Eeewwww.

MoM

On Mon 10 Oct 2005 04:06:16p, Default User wrote in rec.food.cooking:

Quoted message said:

Wayne Boatwright said:

On Mon 10 Oct 2005 02:14:53p, Default User wrote in rec.food.cooking:

Quoted message said:

Jimmy Tango wrote:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Is this maroon back again?

Quoted message said:

Apparently he is. Are you kavetching again?

Are you?

Not at Jimmy Tango. He has as much to post here as you or anyone else. You
have the right not to read it.

--
Wayne Boatwright *¿*
_____________________________

http://tinypic.com/dzijap.jpg

Popie-In-The-Bowl

On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:55:23 GMT, Jimmy Tango

Quoted message said:

Luncheon Casserole

<snip> My memory must be going, b/c I thought your posting sig was
*Tommy* Tango. Or is this Tommy's brother who inherited his mother's
50s era recipes, too? Whatever, the amusement value is there, but
you're no Buffy Lyre :-)

Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd
AAC(F)BV66.0748.CA

"Just what kind of jackassery do I have to put up with today?" Danae
in "Non Sequitur"

To reply, replace "spaminator" with "cox"

Wayne Boatwright said:

On Mon 10 Oct 2005 04:06:16p, Default User wrote in rec.food.cooking:

Quoted message said:

Wayne Boatwright said:

On Mon 10 Oct 2005 02:14:53p, Default User wrote in

rec.food.cooking: >>

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> Jimmy Tango wrote:

Quoted message said:

> Is this maroon back again?

Quoted message said:

Apparently he is. Are you kavetching again?

Are you?

Not at Jimmy Tango. He has as much to post here as you or anyone
else. You have the right not to read it.

What's your point? Did I say he shouldn't be allowed to post?

Brian

--
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

Wayne Boatwright said:

Not at Jimmy Tango. He has as much to post here as you or anyone else. You
have the right not to read it.

If you mean he has as much *right* to post, of course he does. If you
mean he has *as much* to post as anyone else, meaning recipes that
anyone might actually want to eat, I seriously doubt it, based on what
he's posted today. -aem

Wayne Boatwright said:

On Tue 11 Oct 2005 08:43:54a, Default User wrote in rec.food.cooking:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

What's your point? Did I say he shouldn't be allowed to post?

Based on your snide remark, you might as well have.

Base on your snide remarks, it seems you don't extend the same courtesy
to me.

I'm perfectly capable of saying what I mean. You seem to be of the sort
that thinks if *you* like what someone posts, everybody should shut up
and leave them alone. If you don't like what someone else posts, you
have the right to jump all over them in an effort to get them to stop.

You're a hypocrite.

Brian

--
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

On Tue 11 Oct 2005 08:43:54a, Default User wrote in rec.food.cooking:

Quoted message said:

Wayne Boatwright said:

On Mon 10 Oct 2005 04:06:16p, Default User wrote in rec.food.cooking:

Quoted message said:

Wayne Boatwright wrote:

> On Mon 10 Oct 2005 02:14:53p, Default User wrote in
> rec.food.cooking: >>
> > Jimmy Tango wrote:

> > Is this maroon back again?

>
> Apparently he is. Are you kavetching again?

Are you?

Not at Jimmy Tango. He has as much to post here as you or anyone
else. You have the right not to read it.

What's your point? Did I say he shouldn't be allowed to post?

Based on your snide remark, you might as well have.

--
Wayne Boatwright *¿*
____________________________________________

Give me a smart idiot over a stupid genius any day.
Sam Goldwyn, 1882-1974

On Tue 11 Oct 2005 11:11:06a, aem wrote in rec.food.cooking:

Quoted message said:

Wayne Boatwright said:

Not at Jimmy Tango. He has as much to post here as you or anyone else.
You have the right not to read it.

If you mean he has as much *right* to post, of course he does. If you
mean he has *as much* to post as anyone else, meaning recipes that
anyone might actually want to eat, I seriously doubt it, based on what
he's posted today. -aem

Yes, I meant the former. I sometimes type too fast.

However, I don't think anyone here *knows* for a fact that no one wants to
eat recipes he's posted.

--
Wayne Boatwright *¿*
____________________________________________

Give me a smart idiot over a stupid genius any day.
Sam Goldwyn, 1882-1974

In article <[email hidden]>,

Wayne Boatwright said:

On Tue 11 Oct 2005 08:43:54a, Default User wrote in rec.food.cooking:

Quoted message said:

Wayne Boatwright said:

On Mon 10 Oct 2005 04:06:16p, Default User wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>
>> On Mon 10 Oct 2005 02:14:53p, Default User wrote in
>> rec.food.cooking: >>
>> > Jimmy Tango wrote:
>
>> > Is this maroon back again?
>
>>
>> Apparently he is. Are you kavetching again?
>
> Are you?

Not at Jimmy Tango. He has as much to post here as you or anyone
else. You have the right not to read it.

What's your point? Did I say he shouldn't be allowed to post?

Based on your snide remark, you might as well have.

At least when some of us post White Trash cooking, we announce it as
such. ;-)

And he is not participating in any discussion.......
--
Om.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson

On Tue 11 Oct 2005 01:11:35p, Default User wrote in rec.food.cooking:

Quoted message said:

Wayne Boatwright said:

On Tue 11 Oct 2005 08:43:54a, Default User wrote in rec.food.cooking:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

What's your point? Did I say he shouldn't be allowed to post?

Based on your snide remark, you might as well have.

Base on your snide remarks, it seems you don't extend the same courtesy
to me.

The OP merely posted a recipe. Yours was a snide and critical remark which
doesn't deserve courtesy.

Quoted message said:

I'm perfectly capable of saying what I mean. You seem to be of the sort
that thinks if *you* like what someone posts, everybody should shut up
and leave them alone. If you don't like what someone else posts, you
have the right to jump all over them in an effort to get them to stop.

Totally untrue. I never said I liked the OP's posts and I saw no reason
for your rudeness. When you can post without showing your ass, I'll
support your right to do so as well.

Quoted message said:

You're a hypocrite.

Totally untrue.

Quoted message said:

Brian

<plonk>

--
Wayne Boatwright *¿*
____________________________________________

Give me a smart idiot over a stupid genius any day.
Sam Goldwyn, 1882-1974

On Tue 11 Oct 2005 01:44:15p, OmManiPadmeOmelet wrote in rec.food.cooking:

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

Wayne Boatwright said:

On Tue 11 Oct 2005 08:43:54a, Default User wrote in rec.food.cooking:

Quoted message said:

Wayne Boatwright wrote:

> On Mon 10 Oct 2005 04:06:16p, Default User wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
> > Wayne Boatwright wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon 10 Oct 2005 02:14:53p, Default User wrote in
> >> rec.food.cooking: >>
> >> > Jimmy Tango wrote:
> >
> >> > Is this maroon back again?
> >
> >>
> >> Apparently he is. Are you kavetching again?
> >
> > Are you?
>
> Not at Jimmy Tango. He has as much to post here as you or anyone
> else. You have the right not to read it.

What's your point? Did I say he shouldn't be allowed to post?

Based on your snide remark, you might as well have.

At least when some of us post White Trash cooking, we announce it as
such. ;-)

True.

Quoted message said:

And he is not participating in any discussion.......

Also true.

Didn't know these were requirements. Apparently some people seem to think
so. Considering the number of totally off-topic posts that abound here,
this hardly seems like a transgression.

--
Wayne Boatwright *¿*
____________________________________________

Give me a smart idiot over a stupid genius any day.
Sam Goldwyn, 1882-1974

In article <[email hidden]>,

Wayne Boatwright said:

On Tue 11 Oct 2005 01:44:15p, OmManiPadmeOmelet wrote in rec.food.cooking:

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

Wayne Boatwright said:

On Tue 11 Oct 2005 08:43:54a, Default User wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>
>> On Mon 10 Oct 2005 04:06:16p, Default User wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>
>> > Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Mon 10 Oct 2005 02:14:53p, Default User wrote in
>> >> rec.food.cooking: >>
>> >> > Jimmy Tango wrote:
>> >
>> >> > Is this maroon back again?
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Apparently he is. Are you kavetching again?
>> >
>> > Are you?
>>
>> Not at Jimmy Tango. He has as much to post here as you or anyone
>> else. You have the right not to read it.
>
> What's your point? Did I say he shouldn't be allowed to post?

Based on your snide remark, you might as well have.

At least when some of us post White Trash cooking, we announce it as
such. ;-)

True.

Quoted message said:

And he is not participating in any discussion.......

Also true.

Didn't know these were requirements. Apparently some people seem to think
so. Considering the number of totally off-topic posts that abound here,
this hardly seems like a transgression.

Hey, I was trying to be nice... ;-)
Granted, I did KF Mr. Tango, but ONLY because he only did "hit and run"
posting.

A sure sign of a troll IMHO???

I know that you (and I) at least follow up on threads we have started?
:-)
--
Om.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson

On Tue 11 Oct 2005 02:42:34p, OmManiPadmeOmelet wrote in rec.food.cooking:

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

Wayne Boatwright said:

On Tue 11 Oct 2005 01:44:15p, OmManiPadmeOmelet wrote in
rec.food.cooking:

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,
Wayne Boatwright <[email hidden]> wrote:

> On Tue 11 Oct 2005 08:43:54a, Default User wrote in
> rec.food.cooking:
>
> > Wayne Boatwright wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon 10 Oct 2005 04:06:16p, Default User wrote in
> >> rec.food.cooking:
> >>
> >> > Wayne Boatwright wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Mon 10 Oct 2005 02:14:53p, Default User wrote in
> >> >> rec.food.cooking: >>
> >> >> > Jimmy Tango wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> > Is this maroon back again?
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Apparently he is. Are you kavetching again?
> >> >
> >> > Are you?
> >>
> >> Not at Jimmy Tango. He has as much to post here as you or anyone
> >> else. You have the right not to read it.
> >
> > What's your point? Did I say he shouldn't be allowed to post?
>
> Based on your snide remark, you might as well have.

At least when some of us post White Trash cooking, we announce it as
such. ;-)

True.

Quoted message said:

And he is not participating in any discussion.......

Also true.

Didn't know these were requirements. Apparently some people seem to
think so. Considering the number of totally off-topic posts that
abound here, this hardly seems like a transgression.

Hey, I was trying to be nice... ;-)

My remarks were not directed at you. I'm just fed up with the other
numbskulls that can't wait to deliver their criticism of almost anything.

Quoted message said:

Granted, I did KF Mr. Tango, but ONLY because he only did "hit and run"
posting.

No reason not to. You didn't want to see his posts. that's what a
killfile is for. :-) I have about 4 people in my killfile, and they all
happen to be from r.f.c. None of the other groups I read seem to need it.

Quoted message said:

A sure sign of a troll IMHO???

Perhaps, or perhaps just someone that's post happy. His posts don't really
bother me, although I don't always read them.

Quoted message said:

I know that you (and I) at least follow up on threads we have started?
:-)

I try...

--
Wayne Boatwright *¿*
____________________________________________

Give me a smart idiot over a stupid genius any day.
Sam Goldwyn, 1882-1974

Wayne Boatwright said:

Quoted message said:

Granted, I did KF Mr. Tango, but ONLY because he only did "hit and run"
posting.

No reason not to. You didn't want to see his posts. that's what a
killfile is for. :-) I have about 4 people in my killfile, and they all
happen to be from r.f.c. None of the other groups I read seem to need it.

Consider yourself lucky. I subscribe to several groups and one of them has more
than 20 names in the kill file, and there is a strong possibility that at least
10 of them are the same person. The only names in my r.f.c filter are Chung and
the other religious wackos. For some inexplicable reason, one particularly
obnoxious [censored] in here has not been kill filed.

OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

At least when some of us post White Trash cooking, we announce it as
such. ;-)

And he is not participating in any discussion.......

But he SURE has the lot of you birds all a - chatterin'...

;--p

--
Best
Greg

Default User said:

Wayne Boatwright said:

On Mon 10 Oct 2005 04:06:16p, Default User wrote in rec.food.cooking:

Quoted message said:

Wayne Boatwright wrote:

> On Mon 10 Oct 2005 02:14:53p, Default User wrote in

rec.food.cooking: >>

Quoted message said:

> > Jimmy Tango wrote:

> > Is this maroon back again?

>
> Apparently he is. Are you kavetching again?

Are you?

Not at Jimmy Tango. He has as much to post here as you or anyone
else. You have the right not to read it.

What's your point? Did I say he shouldn't be allowed to post?

Tut tut - let's not get into a pissing match over Jimmy's recipes...

--
Best
Greg