General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Mapping software accuracy ????

Started by Nick \(Scots\) · · Last activity · 8 posts · 326 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
10 October 2005
Last activity
12 October 2005
Original author
Nick \(Scots\)
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
326
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hi,

    Just want to check how acurate my elevation data is from
    FUGAWI.

    Could someone put in Killin-Glen Lochay-Hydro rd-Glen Lyon-
    Brdge of balgie-Lawers Visitor centre-Killin all via the rd.

    Thanks

    Nick

  2. Nick (Scots) said:


    Hi,

    Just want to check how acurate my elevation data is from
    FUGAWI.

    Could someone put in Killin-Glen Lochay-Hydro rd-Glen Lyon-
    Brdge of balgie-Lawers Visitor centre-Killin all via the rd.

    Thanks

    Nick


    Nick

    I suggest you try a shorter route as a test. Something that long is too
    prone to placement of waypoints. Choose something short, with very
    definite waypoints.

    I'd be keen to test it against Anquet - any Memory Map/Tracklogs users
    want to volunteer?

    druidh

  3. "Nick (Scots)" <[email hidden]> schreef in bericht
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Hi,

    Just want to check how acurate my elevation data is from
    FUGAWI.

    Could someone put in Killin-Glen Lochay-Hydro rd-Glen Lyon-
    Brdge of balgie-Lawers Visitor centre-Killin all via the rd.

    I tried to be as accurate as possible and this is the result of the Dutch
    jury :
    The points in Anquet are :
    starting point NN 57240 32865 (Killin centre)
    flat lenght 57,33km
    hidden lenght 57,44km
    max.height 560m
    min.height 107m
    ascended 1337m

    On the map there are 2 possibilities near the Loch Lyon Powerstation. I
    followed the path/road nearest to the dam. Don't know about any gates that
    might be closed on this semi-private road.
    HTOH

    --
    Theo
    www.theosphotos.fotopic.net


  4. Quoted message said:

    I suggest you try a shorter route as a test. Something that long is too prone to
    placement of waypoints. Choose something short, with very definite waypoints.

    Thanks, but I want THAT route tested, against my bike computerand Geko GPS.

    Nick


  5. Quoted message said:

    I tried to be as accurate as possible and this is the result of the Dutch jury :
    The points in Anquet are :
    starting point NN 57240 32865 (Killin centre)
    flat lenght 57,33km
    hidden lenght 57,44km
    max.height 560m
    min.height 107m
    ascended 1337m

    Superb Sir ! Exactly what I wanted.

    Ascended 1837m in fugawi. Looks likeit's still exagerating the ht gain/ascent.

    Quoted message said:

    On the map there are 2 possibilities near the Loch Lyon Powerstation. I followed the
    path/road nearest to the dam. Don't know about any gates that might be closed on this
    semi-private road.

    As you descend towards Glen Lyon the hydro tarmac rd bears right toward a smallholding
    and cattle grid, puncture there at easter. The dam rd cuts back left and up.

    A brilliant road cycle, three cars all day and magnificent scenery, open views from the
    Lyon rd.
    Brilliant alpine gradient climb up to Lawers.

    Nick

  6. Nick - Out of curiosity, what height gain did the GPS indicate? - and
    did you have WAAS mode on or off? I've been getting some horrendous
    inaccuracies and then realised that WAAS was switched on.

    druidh

  7. "Nick (Scots)" <[email hidden]> schreef in bericht
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    I tried to be as accurate as possible and this is the result of the Dutch
    jury :
    The points in Anquet are :
    starting point NN 57240 32865 (Killin centre)
    flat lenght 57,33km
    hidden lenght 57,44km
    max.height 560m
    min.height 107m
    ascended 1337m

    Superb Sir ! Exactly what I wanted.

    Ascended 1837m in fugawi. Looks likeit's still exagerating the ht
    gain/ascent.

    Quoted message said:

    On the map there are 2 possibilities near the Loch Lyon Powerstation. I
    followed the path/road nearest to the dam. Don't know about any gates
    that might be closed on this semi-private road.

    As you descend towards Glen Lyon the hydro tarmac rd bears right toward a
    smallholding
    and cattle grid, puncture there at easter. The dam rd cuts back left and
    up.

    A brilliant road cycle, three cars all day and magnificent scenery, open
    views from the Lyon rd.
    Brilliant alpine gradient climb up to Lawers.

    You already know of course, but.... be carefull cycling down to Loch Tay
    from Ben Lawers VC. The road in the final part in the litle wood is narrow
    and cars (drivers e.g) can drive like maniacs to avoid other cars (and hit
    cyclists instead :-(

    --
    Theo
    www.theosphotos.fotopic.net


  8. Quoted message said:

    You already know of course, but.... be carefull cycling down to Loch Tay
    from Ben Lawers VC. The road in the final part in the litle wood is narrow and cars
    (drivers e.g) can drive like maniacs to avoid other cars (and hit cyclists instead :-(

    Yeah, done all the Munros up there and Glen Lyon so know how dodgy that stretch is.

    The rd was lethal Monday, loads of pine needles, leaves and wet.

    My mate ahead, missed the turning.

    Nick

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.