Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

square headtube?

Started by John Albergo · · Last activity · 3 posts · 425 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
14 August 2003
Last activity
14 August 2003
Original author
John Albergo
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
425
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I've had a headset laying on the worktable for some time now and mean to get around to replacing my
    old indexed one.

    One warning I see when reading on the subect is that the tube faces should be squared with the
    appropriate tool before installing the new headset.

    I have a hard time understanding this. I am replacing a headset that performed adequately for years
    and showed no signs of binding other than the indexing that has developed. Why isn't that alone
    proof of a reasonably square tube face? How could the tube faces be misaligned and yet the original
    headset function well? And if that were the case, what now prevents the new headset from achieving
    the same success?

  2. "John Albergo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    I've had a headset laying on the worktable for some time now and mean to get around to replacing
    my old indexed one.

    One warning I see when reading on the subect is that the tube faces should be squared with the
    appropriate tool before installing the new headset.

    I have a hard time understanding this. I am replacing a headset that performed adequately for
    years and showed no signs of binding other than the indexing that has developed. Why isn't that
    alone proof of a reasonably square tube face? How could the tube faces be misaligned and yet the
    original headset function well? And if that were the case, what now prevents the new headset from
    achieving the same success?

    I think it's more intended as a disclaimer than an instruction. Obviously, if your frame has been
    faced in the past and is working adequately you don't need to re-face the frame. That can change,
    for instance, if you were to re-paint the frame. Facing would have to be re-done because paint may
    be on the head tube. Now, if your headset has been loose at any time and caused any kind of damage
    to the head tube, that's a whole different story.

    Cheers,

    Scott..

  3. John-<< One warning I see when reading on the subect is that the tube faces should be squared with
    the appropriate tool before installing the new headset.

    I have a hard time understanding this. I am replacing a headset that performed adequately for years
    and showed no signs of binding other than the indexing that has developed. Why isn't that alone
    proof of a reasonably square tube face? >><BR><BR>

    It probably is. Your headtube sounds like it is parallel...many framesets have headtubes that
    are not...

    Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St. Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535 vecchios.comvecchios.com "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.