Riding into work this morning, I spotted a large tuft of hair that looked as though it had been pulled from the end of a squirrel's tail.
Evidently that particular squirrel slightly mistimed a dash under someone's wheel.
-- Danny Colyer (my reply address is valid but checked infrequently) <URL:http://www.colyer.plus.com/danny/> "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine
Riding into work this morning, I spotted a large tuft of hair that looked as though it had been pulled from the end of a squirrel's tail.
Evidently that particular squirrel slightly mistimed a dash under someone's wheel.
I saw a squirrel with considerably poorer timing the other day at the top of Greenwich park. Theer was an Accident Investigation Unit vehicle witha couple of rozzas unpacking at the side of the road but I suppose that may have been a coincidence
It won't be long before somebody (me?) hits one of those geese in Hyde Park. They have no understanding of the solid white dividing line between the cycle path and the pedestrian path. Mind you, nor do a lot of the humans.
"Danny Colyer" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Riding into work this morning, I spotted a large tuft of hair that looked as though it had been pulled from the end of a squirrel's tail.
Evidently that particular squirrel slightly mistimed a dash under someone's wheel.
-- Danny Colyer (my reply address is valid but checked infrequently) <URL:http://www.colyer.plus.com/danny/> "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine
It won't be long before somebody (me?) hits one of those geese in Hyde Park. They have no understanding of the solid white dividing line between the cycle path and the pedestrian path. Mind you, nor do a lot of the humans.
The white line is something that only cyclists are quired to observe. It has no meaning to pedestrians (exactly like the white line on a mandatory cycle lane, but applying to different classes of user).
So drivers can cross a solid white line into a mandatory cycle lane?
"Ian Smith" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005 13:20:22 +0100, POHB <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
It won't be long before somebody (me?) hits one of those geese in Hyde Park. They have no understanding of the solid white dividing line between the cycle path and the pedestrian path. Mind you, nor do a lot of the humans.
The white line is something that only cyclists are quired to observe. It has no meaning to pedestrians (exactly like the white line on a mandatory cycle lane, but applying to different classes of user).
I just checked the highway code to answer my own question. Whilst it says "MUST" that cyclists keep to their side of the line, it does say in the pedestrians section " Cycle tracks may run alongside footpaths, with a dividing line segregating the two. Keep to the section for pedestrians. "
I couldn't find anything about geese.
"Ian Smith" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005 13:20:22 +0100, POHB <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
It won't be long before somebody (me?) hits one of those geese in Hyde Park. They have no understanding of the solid white dividing line between the cycle path and the pedestrian path. Mind you, nor do a lot of the humans.
The white line is something that only cyclists are quired to observe. It has no meaning to pedestrians (exactly like the white line on a mandatory cycle lane, but applying to different classes of user).
They have no understanding of the solid white dividing line between the cycle path and the pedestrian path. Mind you, nor do a lot of the humans.
The white line is something that only cyclists are quired to observe. It has no meaning to pedestrians (exactly like the white line on a mandatory cycle lane, but applying to different classes of user).
So drivers can cross a solid white line into a mandatory cycle lane?
Do you have to work at that, or does it come naturally?