General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Vitamin Discovery

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 2 posts · 259 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
19 April 2004
Last activity
19 April 2004
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
259
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. What is the history of this subject? Was it done over the years? Was
    it done by one researcher or several? When was the "last" vitamin
    "discovered" & which one was it? Will there be more?

  2. [email hidden] wrote in news:5290-4083FDF3-490@storefull-
    3135.bay.webtv.net:

    Quoted message said:


    What is the history of this subject? Was it done over the years? Was
    it done by one researcher or several? When was the "last" vitamin
    "discovered" & which one was it? Will there be more?

    It's a long and fascinating history. Any good biochemistry text should
    give the details. The discoveries took place over several decades (mostly
    from 1910, when thiamine was discovered, to 1948, when B12 was discovered),
    with different researchers working independently. The substance most
    recently classified as a vitamin was pyrroloquinoline quinone, which was
    discovered in 1979 but only classified as a vitamin last year (it's not yet
    known if there are any *human* deficiency diseases caused by lack of it,
    but it plays a biochemical role similar to that of niacin and riboflavin).

    Incidentally, the discovery of niacin had a lot of political implications;
    Joseph Goldberger proved that the disease pellagra, endemic among poor
    people in the American South, was the result of a deficient diet rather
    than bad genes. This was at the height of the eugenics movement and the
    discovery was a major blow to the eugenicists because it showed that one of
    the problems of the poor could be eliminated by spending more money on them
    rather than by stopping them from breeding. Nature, it seems, isn't always
    as "politically incorrect" as the eugenicists and sociobiologists would
    have you think. Oh, and the eugenicists, when mentioning Goldberger's name
    in sneering tones, would always put an extraordinary amount of emphasis on
    its first syllable.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.