General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: Yacking Mark Thorson

Started by Jan · · Last activity · 4 posts · 247 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
11 April 2004
Last activity
11 April 2004
Original author
Jan
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
247
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Quoted message said:

    From: Mark Thorson

    Overlooking another liar just like himself, both proven, still yacking, still
    on and on and on.

    Quoted message said:

    You forgot you blew that lie.

    Quoted message said:

    You FALSELY accuse people of lying all the time:

    W R O N G.

    I prove it beyond any doubt. As in the below. So, YOU are lying again.

    From: John Bain ([email hidden])
    Subject: Re: Aspartame: Any Truth to the Stories?
    Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
    Date: 2002-09-22 04:26:41 PST

    (Ilsa Nein) said:

    Jan, I'm sure that this Andrew is a fine piece of beef-cake, but I don't see
    why you air this fixation on MHA. Oh, and if you don't quit calling me
    "fake ilsa", I'll report you to Karuna's knee-jerk ISP.

    But Andrew, you are not very good at maintaining your separate personas.
    Do you remember this interchange where you forgot which account you were
    posting from?
    -----------------
    Message 22
    From: Kris Brys ([email hidden])
    Subject: Re: why do we need homeopathy?
    Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
    View this article only
    Date: 2001-10-09 03:30:51 PST
    ----------------------
    "Ilsa Nein" <[email hidden]> schreef in bericht
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I can say much more than one good thing about homeopathy. Not only do
    I love the principle that less can be more but it turns out to be the
    most 'proper' treatment I have ever received. I have used it SOLELY
    for 6 years.

    So, you've been taking it for 6 years and you're not cured?

    Dear Ilsa,
    how many years do you use regular medicine? how many years do you take
    antibiotics. Did that cured you permanently?
    If you start thinking, even a couple of seconds, you will find out that
    people don't cure forever.
    A good advice: read Organon of Samuel Hahnemann. When you haven't read that
    book you will not understand what homeopathy is all about. Read it and than
    ask questions.

    greetings
    Kris
    ------
    Message 23 in thread
    From: JKingoff ([email hidden])
    Subject: Re: why do we need homeopathy?
    Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
    View this article only
    Date: 2001-10-09 06:08:38 PST

    Quoted message said:

    Dear Ilsa,
    how many years do you use regular medicine?

    I haven't needed regular medicine much. I have had my vaccinations, eat
    properly, exercise, and don't take silly risks.

    Quoted message said:

    how many years do you take
    antibiotics

    I have taken antibiotics once. I was Rx'd a single pill.

    Quoted message said:

    . Did that cured you permanently?

    Well, I felt much better the following day and haven't taken one since and
    that
    was bout 6 years ago.

    Quoted message said:

    If you start thinking, even a couple of seconds, you will find out that
    people don't cure forever.

    Duh. However, some conditions are resolved and in the absence of
    re-infection
    they don't reoccur.

    Quoted message said:

    A good advice: read Organon of Samuel Hahnemann. When you haven't read that
    book you will not understand what homeopathy is all about. Read it and than
    ask questions.

    I've read it and I've read more modern books on it. Its pure hokum and the
    few
    well controlled studies support that conclusion. Even the study that is
    frequently posted to MHA that supposedly proves homeopathy isn't even
    FAVORABLE
    to homeopathy.

    Quoted message said:


    greetings
    Kris

    Show us a replicated, controlled, peer-reviewed study which show that
    homeopathy is efficacious. Homeopathy was Hahnemann's way of acting-out
    against "the system". It is nothing more than superstition, pseudo-science,
    and sympathetic magic.

    In the 21st century, we have real medicine and don't need to cling to the
    vanity of a long deceased, disaffected 18th century doctor of voodoo.

  2. Jan the Accuser said:

    Mis-state

    to state incorrectly : give a false account of

    False

    intentionally untrue

    lie

    untrue with intent to deceive

    So Jan, why don't you post an example of an ORIGINAL
    statement I made about Cell Tech or their algae which
    was false?

    Even Cell Tech did not accuse me of making any false
    statements, nor does the retraction say any of my statements
    were false.

    You persist in making this accusation against me,
    but you have not shown EVEN ONE example of
    a statement I made which is false, much less a LIE.

    Why don't you post an example, Jan? Then everybody
    could see for themselves what one of these statements
    looks like, and decide for themselves whether or not
    it was a LIE. Why don't you want people to do that, Jan?
    Why do you want to prevent people from reaching their
    own conclusions about whether anything I said was a LIE?

    Is it because any example you could choose would
    OBVIOUSLY NOT be a false statement? And then,
    people would see it was not me who makes LIES.

    Do you need help seeing what a LIE looks like, Jan?

    Here is an example:

    To see Jan's ORIGINAL POSTING, go here:
    http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20040310000815.25804.00001173%40mb-m01.aol.com

    Jan said:
    Quoted message said:

    From: Mark Thorson [email hidden]

    Instead of responding to what you say, Jan is trying to discredit
    you by making insinuations about who you are or what your
    motives may be.

    Soon, she may accuse you of being on the payroll of the
    pharmaceutical companies, etc. That's the way Jan works.

    That would be ANOTHER LIE from Mark Thorson. I have NEVER accused


    anyone of

    Quoted message said:

    any such thing.

    So do prove your claim Mark!!!!!

    You can't YOU JUST LIED AGAIN!!!!!!!

    ----- example quotes of Jan accusing people of being paid shills -----

    Quoting from this ORIGINAL posting from Jan Drew:
    http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030415173745.18794.00000646%40mb-fn.aol.com

    Any time alt. health is mentioned the personal trashing starts. Mostly
    comes from paid shill Mark Probert.

    Quoting from this ORIGINAL posting from Jan Drew:
    http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030412210802.08778.00000680%40mb-fw.aol.com

    Internet bully Mark Probert who is a paid shill and lives off his wife.

    Quoting from this ORIGINAL posting from Jan Drew:
    http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030410170838.14245.00000347%40mb-ct.aol.com

    As for Mark, he is a paid shill and lives off his wife.

    Quoting from this ORIGINAL posting from Jan Drew:
    http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030325123827.25124.00000246%40mb-mn.aol.com

    As long as Mark is here, the paid shill will call names when in fact
    he is the one who is a bigot. Speaking of his own people.

  3. "Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    From: Mark Thorson

    Overlooking another liar just like himself, both proven, still yacking,


    still

    Quoted message said:

    on and on and on.

    Quoted message said:

    You forgot you blew that lie.

    Quoted message said:

    You FALSELY accuse people of lying all the time:

    W R O N G.

    I prove it beyond any doubt.

    I'm still waiting for Jan's proof that that Ted feller told any lies.
    Must be because she can't!

    Quoted message said:

    As in the below. So, YOU are lying again.

    So because JKingoff replied to a post directed at Ilsa, you and John
    think they're the same person?

    Holy Cow, no wonder you get scammed coming and going!

    You must have a big sign on your forehead=SUCKER

  4. Quoted message said:


    "Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    From: Mark Thorson

    Overlooking another liar just like himself, both proven, still yacking,


    still

    Quoted message said:

    on and on and on.

    Quoted message said:

    You forgot you blew that lie.

    Quoted message said:

    You FALSELY accuse people of lying all the time:

    W R O N G.

    I prove it beyond any doubt.

    I'm still waiting for Jan's proof that that Ted feller told any lies.
    Must be because she can't!

    Quoted message said:

    As in the below. So, YOU are lying again.

    So because JKingoff replied to a post directed at Ilsa, you and John
    think they're the same person?

    Holy Cow, no wonder you get scammed coming and going!

    You must have a big sign on your forehead=SUCKER

    How many times has Jan chimed in to answer a question posed to someone else? I
    guess its okay for her to do that in a public forum, but not okay for this
    Andrew person. In any event, how could it have any bearing on Mark Thorson?

    So Sad, that Jan.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.