Road Cycling · Public discussion
Nice Retro Lemond Article
This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Road Cycling
- Published
- 2 October 2005
- Last activity
- 4 October 2005
- Original author
- B. Lafferty
- Posts
- 11
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 471
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
That was good...
-
It's nice to see that Greg has not been whining as much......
-
<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
It's nice to see that Greg has not been whining as much......
It ceased being whining on August 23rd.
-
??
Not certain what 8/23 refers to... But I was referring to Greg's change
of attitude over the past year or so. -
Quoted message said:
??
Not certain what 8/23 refers to... But I was referring to Greg's change
of attitude over the past year or so.When did he make the remarks in the article? I don't see where it says
they are recent.I'm not sure what 8/23 is either but you can bet your ass it has
something to do with Armstrong.Greg's attitude is always good when the subject is "Greg is great".
-
D. Ferguson said:
Quoted message said:
Not certain what 8/23 refers to... But I was referring to Greg's change
of attitude over the past year or so.When did he make the remarks in the article? I don't see where it says
they are recent.I'm not sure what 8/23 is either but you can bet your ass it has
something to do with Armstrong.No, it's the day Bernie Hinault finally admitted that
Greg was the virtual winner of le Tour 1985. What would
Armstrong have to do with this? -
<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
D. Ferguson said:
Quoted message said:
Not certain what 8/23 refers to... But I was referring to Greg's change
of attitude over the past year or so.When did he make the remarks in the article? I don't see where it says
they are recent.I'm not sure what 8/23 is either but you can bet your ass it has
something to do with Armstrong.No, it's the day Bernie Hinault finally admitted that
Greg was the virtual winner of le Tour 1985. What would
Armstrong have to do with this?Ferguson's on it.
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2005/aug05/aug23news2
JF
-
Brian, You would not suspect that Lemond ever took any of that stuff that
you think Armstrong has ? Remember 1989 ?
"B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
-
"Steve" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Brian, You would not suspect that Lemond ever took any of that stuff that
you think Armstrong has ? Remember 1989 ?
"B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
I have suspicions about Lemond using steroids and pointed that out here at
rbr back in 1994. Assuming that Lemond did get an iron shot from his doctor
father-in-law, the placebo effect might be more significant. If he did use
epo, I would have expected him to ride better than he did against Fignon
prior to the final day. -
In article
<[email hidden]>,B. Lafferty said:
"Steve" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Brian, You would not suspect that Lemond ever took any of that stuff that
you think Armstrong has ? Remember 1989 ?
"B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
I have suspicions about Lemond using steroids and pointed that out here at
rbr back in 1994. Assuming that Lemond did get an iron shot from his doctor
father-in-law, the placebo effect might be more significant. If he did use
epo, I would have expected him to ride better than he did against Fignon
prior to the final day.Does this make Lemond a virtual doper?
--
Michael Press
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.