General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: shoes

Started by Helen · · Last activity · 4 posts · 440 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
28 September 2005
Last activity
30 September 2005
Original author
Helen
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
440
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. "brigham" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 01:41:21 GMT, "Dave Combs" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    My doctor recommended running shoes because they have more arch support


    and

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    cushioning. Frankly I'm from the era where Converse Chuck Taylor's (I


    liked

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    black the best). Now there are so many variations of shoes I'm waiting


    for

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    a manufacturer to make one model if you start with your left foot and one


    if

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    you start with your right foot.

    Seriously, find a pair of shoes that are comfortable and have appropriate
    padding and support. However I do believe that shoes are shot after 500
    miles. I know from experience.

    How does this reconcile with the general advice in books and on the
    net that walkers should buy walking shoes, not running shoes?

    BTW Anybody else notice quality problems with New Balance?

    YES! Definitely low...low quality! They are full of defects...the last
    three pairs I purchased had similar DEFECTS! Also the stitching...isn't
    smooth..
    caused problems... no more NB for me! I've had it! They are LYING to say
    that the quality is the same as five years ago...it is NOT!

    Indeed you can feel it, and it will cause problems. I just spent $400 at
    the podiatrist as a result of NB's DEFECTIVE low...LOW quality for enormous
    price shoes! I've more than learned my lesson! THEY ARE CHEAPLY
    MADE...and DEFINITELY LOW LOW QUALITY! Probably pay the Chinese a quarter
    a day to cut an sew them....all the rest is PROFIT!!!!

    I'm looking for some Converse ones. No more NB!!!

    I've used

    Quoted message said:

    them for years, but the newest pair - 843 - made in the USA to boot -
    has a slight "bump" on the sole in one shoe, and the retailer said it
    wasn't really a defect... I sure can feel it!!!

  2. Helen' @abuse.roman.gov said:

    YES! Definitely low...low quality! They are full of defects...the last
    three pairs I purchased had similar DEFECTS! Also the stitching...isn't
    smooth..
    caused problems... no more NB for me! I've had it! They are LYING to say
    that the quality is the same as five years ago...it is NOT!

    Indeed you can feel it, and it will cause problems. I just spent $400 at
    the podiatrist as a result of NB's DEFECTIVE low...LOW quality for enormous
    price shoes! I've more than learned my lesson! THEY ARE CHEAPLY
    MADE...and DEFINITELY LOW LOW QUALITY! Probably pay the Chinese a quarter
    a day to cut an sew them....all the rest is PROFIT!!!!

    Well my experience with NB wasn't as dramatic, but they do suck as bad
    as the rest. My NB's lasted about 400 miles, average by these
    numbnutz's calculations, but pathetic in comparison to my Asics, which
    BTW are getting to be [censored] too. Years ago my Asics would last 1000
    miles or more. My newest pair are breaking down after 700, so they've
    dropped in quality too. I guess it's just a sign of the times.

    Quoted message said:

    I'm looking for some Converse ones. No more NB!!!

    Boy O boy, talk about going from the frying pan into the fire...

  3. "TheBillRogers" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Helen' @abuse.roman.gov said:

    YES! Definitely low...low quality! They are full of defects...the last
    three pairs I purchased had similar DEFECTS! Also the stitching...isn't
    smooth..
    caused problems... no more NB for me! I've had it! They are LYING to


    say

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    that the quality is the same as five years ago...it is NOT!

    Indeed you can feel it, and it will cause problems. I just spent $400 at
    the podiatrist as a result of NB's DEFECTIVE low...LOW quality for


    enormous

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    price shoes! I've more than learned my lesson! THEY ARE CHEAPLY
    MADE...and DEFINITELY LOW LOW QUALITY! Probably pay the Chinese a


    quarter

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    a day to cut an sew them....all the rest is PROFIT!!!!

    Well my experience with NB wasn't as dramatic, but they do suck as bad
    as the rest. My NB's lasted about 400 miles, average by these
    numbnutz's calculations, but pathetic in comparison to my Asics, which
    BTW are getting to be [censored] too. Years ago my Asics would last 1000
    miles or more. My newest pair are breaking down after 700, so they've
    dropped in quality too. I guess it's just a sign of the times.

    Quoted message said:

    I'm looking for some Converse ones. No more NB!!!

    Boy O boy, talk about going from the frying pan into the fire...

    It was a joke! But the quality is no less....

  4. Helen' @abuse.roman.gov said:

    It was a joke! But the quality is no less....

    LOL, ok then. Carry on!

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.