Road Cycling · Public discussion

Camera Recommendations.

Started by Monty · · Last activity · 29 posts · 718 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
24 September 2005
Last activity
27 September 2005
Original author
Monty
Posts
29
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
718
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 29
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I would like to have a digital camera with me for some of the rides. I see a
    lot of wild life and beautiful vistas. I have a Nikon D70, but that is MUCH
    too large. I would like to put the camera in my jersey pocket. The smaller
    the better, but I would like to be able to get 5x7s and maybe an occasional
    8x10.

    Any recommendations?

    Thanks
    Monty

  2. Monty said:

    I would like to have a digital camera with me for some of the rides. I see a
    lot of wild life and beautiful vistas. I have a Nikon D70, but that is MUCH
    too large. I would like to put the camera in my jersey pocket. The smaller
    the better, but I would like to be able to get 5x7s and maybe an occasional
    8x10.

    I recently purchased a Canon SD300 ELPH, 4.1mpx, VERY small. 2" screen,
    replacable battery

    It takes wonderful photos and you have 2mpx and 5mpx options (SD200 and
    SD400) as well. I paid $304 with tax. Only complaint is I wish it
    indicated battery life remaining. Other then that, for a point and
    shoot automatic, it's a very nice camera and about the smallest they
    come.

    cnet.com as well as the camera review section of this site has add'l
    info.

    SB

  3. Monty said:

    I would like to have a digital camera .....

    Any recommendations?

    http://reviews.cnet.com/Digital_cameras/4520-7603_7-5023995-7.html?tag=dir.dpg

  4. Quoted message said:

    I recently purchased a Canon SD300 ELPH, 4.1mpx, VERY small. 2" screen,
    replacable battery

    The Canon Digitial Elphs take nice pictures, good size to take with
    you anywhere....I have one, like it.

  5. :I would like to have a digital camera with me for some of the rides. I see
    a
    : lot of wild life and beautiful vistas. I have a Nikon D70, but that is
    MUCH
    : too large. I would like to put the camera in my jersey pocket. The smaller
    : the better, but I would like to be able to get 5x7s and maybe an
    occasional
    : 8x10.
    :
    : Any recommendations?
    :
    : Thanks
    : Monty

    I have a Canon A80. One of my main reasons is that it is not totally flat
    like the Elphs and the Sony that my son bought. I can put it in my back
    right pocket and reach around grasping the bulge (where the batteries fit
    in) and have a nice tight grip on the camera.

    Pat in TX
    :
    :
    :

  6. For teeny the previously mention Canon SD300 is a good choice but do look at
    the Canon A510 & A 520 3M and 4M respectively and as cheap as $165 and $200
    if you hunt around the net. Somewhat larger then the SD300 but still small.
    Also several advantages to the A series: Uses 2 AA batteries instead of the
    proprietary Canon batteries in the SD series, buy rechargable NIMH AA or any
    convenient store will have AAs. Zoon is 35-140 optical equivelant. Has more
    manual control features then the SD series. Frankly the SD is almost too
    small for my hands, but you should hold each.

    For what its worth I'm a professional photographer.

    Rick

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:


    I would like to have a digital camera with me for some of the rides. I see a
    lot of wild life and beautiful vistas. I have a Nikon D70, but that is MUCH
    too large. I would like to put the camera in my jersey pocket. The smaller
    the better, but I would like to be able to get 5x7s and maybe an occasional
    8x10.

    Any recommendations?

    Thanks
    Monty

  7. Monty said:

    I would like to have a digital camera with me for some of the rides. I see a
    lot of wild life and beautiful vistas. I have a Nikon D70, but that is MUCH
    too large. I would like to put the camera in my jersey pocket. The smaller
    the better, but I would like to be able to get 5x7s and maybe an occasional
    8x10.

    http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs/Nikon/nikon_cps4.asp

    Don <www.donwiss.com> (e-mail link at home page bottom).

  8. I bought a used A60 (the 2MP version of the A70, A80 series).
    Fantastic image quality.

    One caveat on Canon's: the dreaded E18 error.

    Google "E18 error Canon". Mine developed it and I've since fixed it. It may
    render a Canon inoperative until fixed though. The short of it: a large
    number of their models share a zoom/focus mechanism which has a screw that
    can come loose with repeated vibration. (such as experienced cycling)
    Happened to mine after a few months of riding around in a wedge bag.
    Fortunately there are also some good tutorials online on how to fix it but
    you have to dissect your camera...

    Wouldn't stop me from buying a Canon though.

    C.

    "Monty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I would like to have a digital camera with me for some of the rides. I see
    a lot of wild life and beautiful vistas. I have a Nikon D70, but that is
    MUCH too large. I would like to put the camera in my jersey pocket. The
    smaller the better, but I would like to be able to get 5x7s and maybe an
    occasional 8x10.

    Any recommendations?

    Thanks
    Monty

  9. "Monty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I would like to have a digital camera with me for some of the rides. I see


    a

    Quoted message said:

    lot of wild life and beautiful vistas. I have a Nikon D70, but that is


    MUCH

    Quoted message said:

    too large. I would like to put the camera in my jersey pocket. The smaller
    the better, but I would like to be able to get 5x7s and maybe an


    occasional

    Quoted message said:

    8x10.

    Any recommendations?

    Thanks
    Monty


    I use a very small Pentax Optio s4i digital camera myself.
    It is small enough to fit into a Altoids Mint Box.
    It also has macro close up capability and a zoom capability too.
    Mine is a 5megapixel size so it does up to 8x10 pics OK.

  10. Quoted message said:

    I would like to have a digital camera with me for some of the rides. I see
    a lot of wild life and beautiful vistas. I have a Nikon D70, but that is
    MUCH too large. I would like to put the camera in my jersey pocket. The
    smaller the better, but I would like to be able to get 5x7s and maybe an
    occasional 8x10.

    Any recommendations?

    I've used quite a number of small digital cameras while riding, primarily
    Olympus (D220, D340L, D450Z, C3000, D40, 5050) which were all nice cameras,
    although the 5050 was too large for a jersey pocket (the C3000 just barely
    fit, while the others had no problem). I've also used a couple of Fujis, the
    E510 (*not* recommended!!!) and more recently, the F10.

    The Olympus cameras are difficult to get a bad photo with, at least the ones
    I've used. White balance is always perfect, colors rendered nicely but not
    obviously oversaturated, moderate noise at low ISO. Higher ISO tends to be
    too noisy, as it is with virtually any small camera, except...

    ....except the Fuji F10. Strange little camera that can't quite make up its
    mind as to whether it's a point-and-shoot or something that aspires to
    greatness in the hands of a skilled photographer. Strange menu system,
    "manual" controls don't let you set that much (you can specify neither
    aperture nor speed), but it's FAST, really FAST starting up, and it's got
    usable ISO to 800, with a 1600 mode that is similar to what most cameras
    offer at 400.

    High points-

    FAST startup speed. Turn it on and boom, she's ready to go.
    Very low noise, even at ISO 400.
    Nice rectangular shape, with a bulge on the right side so you know it's
    orientation when you take it out of your pocket.
    Phenomenal macro capabilities (which won't be much help when riding)
    Surprisingly decent movie mode.
    Extraordinary battery life (300+ photos without flash).
    Seems built well
    Big screen

    Low points-

    No optical viewfinder. A problem taking photos in bright light when you
    don't have much time (such as riding downhill and approaching a corner at
    35mph, when you need to shoot fast and put the camera away).
    Bizarre menu system that takes time to get used to. Setting ISO hard to do
    in bright light.
    No direct control over shutter speed; you need to set the ISO appropriately
    to force it into the range you want.
    Lens only goes to 36mm (equivalent) wide; for shots taken while riding, 28
    would be nice.
    Purple fringing on high-contrast shots at 36mm.
    White balance gets thrown off in less-than-sunny conditions.
    Semi-proprietary battery (LP120).
    Ridiculous dongle thingee needed to charge battery & download photos.
    XD media cards are relatively expensive (although truthfully you really just
    need one, and you can find 512meg for about $50)

    Seems like quite a few negatives, but for taking shots while riding, these
    are the factors that outweigh all else-

    #1: Fast startup (and shutdown). Things happen fast on a bike, and you don't
    want to be getting into trouble because you're taking pictures.

    #2: Those beautiful ISO 400 (and even 800) photos. To keep pix sharp while
    riding, you really need to keep the shutter speed above 1/300th at wide
    angle, and at least 1/500th when zoomed out a bit. Using the higher ISO
    settings keeps the shutter in the range you need.

    #3: Long battery life is a real blessing for those of us who take zillions
    of shots, hoping that something comes out. Nice not having to carry two or
    three extra sets of AA NiMH batteries!

    #4: The rectangular shape and bulge on right side helps you pre-position the
    camera in your hand as you remove it from your pocket, so you don't have to
    mess with it (and risk dropping it) once it's out.

    What do I miss from my Olympus cameras? Mostly the always-perfect white
    balance, better lens and, on later models, the "my mode" feature where you
    can specify a ton of settings and get to them really quickly.

    --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
    www.ChainReactionBicycles.com

  11. Monty said:

    I would like to have a digital camera with me for some of the rides. I see a
    lot of wild life and beautiful vistas. I have a Nikon D70, but that is MUCH
    too large. I would like to put the camera in my jersey pocket. The smaller
    the better, but I would like to be able to get 5x7s and maybe an occasional
    8x10.

    I have the D70 also; terrific camera. I also really like the Panasonic's
    with the Leica lenses (e.g., FZ5), but those aren't too much smaller.
    For the size you're looking for I'd agree with Pat, Rick, and C.J. on
    the A series Canons. They get a lot of recommendations on some of the
    photo forums.

    Look for reviews on <http://dpreview.com/>
    Look for example photos from different cameras at
    <http://www.pbase.com/cameras>

    Regards,
    Randy.

  12. Monty said:

    I would like to have a digital camera with me for some of the rides. I see a
    lot of wild life and beautiful vistas. I have a Nikon D70, but that is MUCH
    too large. I would like to put the camera in my jersey pocket. The smaller
    the better, but I would like to be able to get 5x7s and maybe an occasional
    8x10.

    The Canon SD series is probably your best bet. I preferred the S500
    because it uses CF as opposed to SD, but it's no longer available. The
    A510 and A520 are cheaper, and a bit larger, but the big disadvantage is
    that they use AA cells, as opposed to a Li-Ion battery.

  13. "SMS" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    The Canon SD series is probably your best bet. I preferred the S500
    because it uses CF as opposed to SD, but it's no longer available. The
    A510 and A520 are cheaper, and a bit larger, but the big disadvantage is
    that they use AA cells, as opposed to a Li-Ion battery.

    I consider the use of AA cells an advantage, not a disadvantage. Especially
    when traveling, and most especially when traveling independent of AC power
    for the charger.

  14. I should have added:

    While Fuji and Olympus digicams take very good quality photos, they use xD
    cards.

    AVOID LIKE THE PLAGUE. xD, while available now, is yet another dead-end
    technology based on "SmartMedia" - an already-dead memory card format.

    Stick with SD cards or Compact flash. Supporting xD by purchasing a camera
    that uses it is just encouraging manufacturers to make more bad,
    non-standard formats.

  15. C.J.Patten said:

    While Fuji and Olympus digicams take very good quality photos, they use xD
    cards.

    AVOID LIKE THE PLAGUE. xD, while available now, is yet another dead-end
    technology based on "SmartMedia" - an already-dead memory card format.

    We have a camera that uses xD cards and I don't see the issue, as the
    media is pretty much "transparent"; we never take it out. It'll store
    100s of pics, and we upload directly to the computer, never removeing
    the card (OK, we did remove it once to replace the original with a
    higher capacity one, but never since).

    Additionally, I've seen xD cards for sale in checkout lines at drug
    stores, so I think they're relatively common.

    I'd choose based on the cameras abilty to take the photos you want, not
    it's storage medium.

    Rich

  16. SMS said:
    Monty said:

    I would like to have a digital camera with me for some of the rides. I
    see a lot of wild life and beautiful vistas. I have a Nikon D70, but
    that is MUCH too large. I would like to put the camera in my jersey
    pocket. The smaller the better, but I would like to be able to get
    5x7s and maybe an occasional 8x10.

    The Canon SD series is probably your best bet. I preferred the S500
    because it uses CF as opposed to SD, but it's no longer available. The
    A510 and A520 are cheaper, and a bit larger, but the big disadvantage is
    that they use AA cells, as opposed to a Li-Ion battery.

    We have a Canon A85 and we use a set of NiMH AAs that I bought, seems to
    do well on them.... The big advantage to AA's though, if your batteries
    do die (including your spares), then even in the tiniest settlement you
    can get a set of disposables.

    If you do long distance biking, then carrying a charger and battery for
    the camera, another for the GPS, another for the Weather radio, another
    for the cycle-computer, another for the lights. If they all use AA then
    you need one set of spares for the device that takes the most batteries
    (probably 4), and one charger. When batteries run out, you swap the
    spares into that device, and charge them at the next stop.

    W

  17. C.J.Patten said:

    I should have added:

    While Fuji and Olympus digicams take very good quality photos, they use xD
    cards.

    AVOID LIKE THE PLAGUE. xD, while available now, is yet another dead-end
    technology based on "SmartMedia" - an already-dead memory card format.

    Stick with SD cards or Compact flash. Supporting xD by purchasing a camera
    that uses it is just encouraging manufacturers to make more bad,
    non-standard formats.

    Excellent point. Not really an issue, since the best small cameras use SD.

  18. SMS said:

    ... are cheaper, and a bit larger, but the big disadvantage is
    that they use AA cells, as opposed to a Li-Ion battery.

    The advantage of Li-Ion batteries is they are smaller and lighter for the
    charge that they hold.

    Don <www.donwiss.com> (e-mail link at home page bottom).

  19. Actually battery life for the A510/A520 with 2AA batteries is as long or
    longer then the proprietary Li-Ion batteries. And a pack of 4 2500MA AA NIMH
    is about $10 and chargers can be had for as little as $10; or if you forgot
    batteries and you're out riding just about any convenient store carries AA but
    none will carry the specific Li-Ion you're camera needs . . . or any LI-ions.
    Also you really need to have a backup Li-Ion for your SD series, the Canon
    battery will definitley give you sticker shock.

    Not withstanding my above remarks, much of my opinion is based on my having
    many AA batteries around (with several rechargers) and not wanting to ad
    another system. For someone just buying a camera, this may not be an issue.

    Rick
    www.rickschiller.comIn article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:


    Monty said:

    I would like to have a digital camera with me for some of the rides. I see


    a

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    lot of wild life and beautiful vistas. I have a Nikon D70, but that is MUCH
    too large. I would like to put the camera in my jersey pocket. The smaller
    the better, but I would like to be able to get 5x7s and maybe an occasional
    8x10.

    The Canon SD series is probably your best bet. I preferred the S500
    because it uses CF as opposed to SD, but it's no longer available. The
    A510 and A520 are cheaper, and a bit larger, but the big disadvantage is
    that they use AA cells, as opposed to a Li-Ion battery.

  20. Don Wiss said:


    SMS said:


    ... are cheaper, and a bit larger, but the big disadvantage is
    that they use AA cells, as opposed to a Li-Ion battery.

    The advantage of Li-Ion batteries is they are smaller and lighter for the
    charge that they hold.

    This advantage is real but fairly modest. Another important consideration
    is that Li-Ion rechargeable batteries wear out rather rapidly, even
    without use -- something on the order of 2 years or so. If the
    manufacturer no longer makes the proprietary battery when yours is worn
    out, you are unlikely to be able to find a replacement (NOS batteries will
    be also worn out) and will be forced to discontinue use of the camera,
    even if it still works fine otherwise. AA cells will be available
    essentially forever.

    (This is a big problem with cell phones.)

    Reid

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.