Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

which Trek to get?

Started by Help · · Last activity · 5 posts · 904 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
9 August 2003
Last activity
9 August 2003
Original author
Help
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
904
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I am considering getting a Trek to ride on the road/park. i.e., mainly road or rugged path.

    Considered
    - Trek 4300
    - Trek 4100
    - Navigator 300
    - Navigator 200

    Navigator seems the most expensive, but what looks attractive is the "Suspension" saddle. Certainly
    don't think I need the extra gears on offered by 4300 or Navigator 300, but is it worth having the
    better fork/brake on offered by these 2 (compared with 4100, 200)??

  2. "help" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I am considering getting a Trek to ride on the road/park. i.e., mainly


    road

    Quoted message said:

    or rugged path.

    Considered
    - Trek 4300
    - Trek 4100
    - Navigator 300
    - Navigator 200

    Navigator seems the most expensive, but what looks attractive is the "Suspension" saddle.
    Certainly don't think I need the extra gears on offered by 4300 or Navigator 300, but is it worth
    having the better fork/brake on offered by these 2 (compared with 4100, 200)??


    Any one of them would be good. You can't go wrong with a Trek

    JD

  3. "JD" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "help" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I am considering getting a Trek to ride on the road/park. i.e., mainly


    road

    Quoted message said:

    or rugged path.

    Considered
    - Trek 4300
    - Trek 4100
    - Navigator 300
    - Navigator 200

    Navigator seems the most expensive, but what looks attractive is the "Suspension" saddle.
    Certainly don't think I need the extra gears on offered by 4300 or Navigator 300, but is it
    worth having the better fork/brake on offered by these 2 (compared with 4100, 200)??


    Any one of them would be good. You can't go wrong with a Trek

    JD

    LMAO! Come on JD, anyone of these will serve "his" purpose.

    --
    - Zilla Cary, NC (Remove XSPAM)

  4. "Zilla" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    "JD" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "help" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I am considering getting a Trek to ride on the road/park. i.e., mainly


    road

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    or rugged path.

    Considered
    - Trek 4300
    - Trek 4100
    - Navigator 300
    - Navigator 200

    Navigator seems the most expensive, but what looks attractive is the "Suspension" saddle.
    Certainly don't think I need the extra gears on offered by 4300 or Navigator 300, but is it
    worth having the better fork/brake on offered by these 2 (compared with 4100, 200)??


    Any one of them would be good. You can't go wrong with a Trek

    JD

    LMAO! Come on JD, anyone of these will serve "his" purpose.

    It appears that one of our new psychos has way too much time on their hands:

    X-Abuse-Report: [email hidden] Message-ID: <[email hidden]>
    Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2003 13:26:22 GMT Lines: 22 Reply-To: "JD" <[email hidden]> From: "JD"
    <[email hidden]> Newsgroups: alt.mountain-bike References: <[email hidden]>
    Subject: Re: which Trek to get? Organization: Egos Anonymous MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type:
    text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority:
    Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft
    MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165

    Quite lame, if you ask me.

    JD

  5. I Have a 2002 4300 myself (sliver, and candy blue), and I'm loving it. Mostly ridding off road on
    the weekends, and to and from work 80 percent of the time. I run a 2.1 WTB on the front wheel and
    I've upgraded my forks to 01 Marzocchi Z5's also switched to M515 pedals. lots of smaller things too
    like the BB. I plan on riding this bike for a very long time. Slowly upgrading parts then moving
    them over to a Custom built Ti SEVEN cycles Sola. Most likely in the winter of 2004. My point is
    that I'll hold on the Trek for sure, "I see it being rebirthed as a single speed".

    My only concern with a suspension seat post is. That when your seated and you roll over something
    large enough to compress the suspension. It will shorten the distance between your pedals and
    your saddle. So you really can't pedal while riding over something unless you stand up which
    means your not using the seat post. Other than that I can still see the plus side to the added
    comfort when rolling.

    Brakes who uses brakes? Just kidding I'm really not familiar with the brakes on the other models
    you've listed.

    Zilla is right anyone of these bikes should serve your purpose well. Test ride all four in your
    size, each one will have a different feel. And then go from there.

    Greg

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.