Mark Thompson said:Quoted message said:However I'm a little surprised at the OP's comment "lessons to be
learned from these events".
Defibs and first aiders trained to use them?
Dunno about defibs specifically, but there were a lot of first-aiders
around and they had a lot of kit spread about them.
Quoted message said:Measures taken to provide a faster response from people in trouble?
They say the ambulances took quite a while to reach one person. There was
one part of the course where we all moved to the left to allow an
ambulance to pass - not ideal, but there are side roads along much of
the course so access seemed pretty good.
Quoted message said:More water stops on hot days?
But not many more - overhydration as bad as dehydration. Close to the
front-runners, there was water to spare though I thought the showers could
have been turned up a bit higher.
Quoted message said:Good advice given on health and fitness well in advance of the race (I
think the organisers of the London marathon do this)...
They sent out an information pack. I didn't read it in detail this year,
but in previous years it had training schedules etc.
There's always room for improvement and I guess these things are difficult
to evaluate from the outside, but my impression was that the event was
generally very well organised. The Guardian says there have been 8 deaths
over the last 24 years, which is proportionately less than yesterday
even taking into account there are more competitors now. It's tragic that
so many people died yesterday, but given the numbers are so small I'm not
sure how much significance one should read into it (statistical noise).
Yesterday's lesson for me was that cycling isn't good training for
running. Cycling is completely painless and I could still cruise along at
20 the afternoon after the race, but up and down stairs is quite shaky.
AC