Re: aspartame

TC said:

shorten the subject line

Shorten the entire post. In fact, shorten it to zero lines then
refrain from posting it!

This is somewhat uncharacteristic of you, Dr. Norman. Just out of
curiousity, why that post in particular?

"r norman" <NotMyRealEmail@_comcast.net> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

TC said:

shorten the subject line

Shorten the entire post. In fact, shorten it to zero lines then
refrain from posting it!

Glen M. Sizemore said:

"r norman" <NotMyRealEmail@_comcast.net> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

TC said:

shorten the subject line

Shorten the entire post. In fact, shorten it to zero lines then
refrain from posting it!

This is somewhat uncharacteristic of you, Dr. Norman. Just out of
curiousity, why that post in particular?

[Note: I "corrected" your top-posting]

Rich Murray has been publishing these extremely long and tedious
anti-aspartame notices for years, now. In times past, the
anti-aspartame group really was quite a nuisance in this
(bionet.neuroscience) newsgroup. Now, it is at least somewhat
subdued. I simply wish it to be eliminated completely.

This is written as I sit sipping my diet soda. I notice that the one
I now drink is sweetened with acesulfane and sucralose. The only
reason I switched from the type with aspartame is to eliminate the
caffeine which, my doctor assures me, is not good for my health. That
did concern me. The methanol derived from aspartame, plus the
phenylalanine and aspartate, absolutely did not.