Road Cycling · Public discussion

"Fignon-style"

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 4 posts · 624 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
29 August 2005
Last activity
30 August 2005
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
624
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/2005/vuelta05/index.php?id=vuelta052/2_14g

    I saw old Mike Norton (of BOB, not young Mike Norton of YSG-Ideal Tile)
    do this too.

    JT

  2. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/2005/vuelta05/index.php?id=vuelta052/2_14g

    I saw old Mike Norton (of BOB, not young Mike Norton of YSG-Ideal Tile)
    do this too.

    JT

    Would someone be so kind as to explain exactly what part broke? I can't
    seem to figure out what type of failure would have led to the right side of
    the crankset being all caddywampus such as it appears.

    I'd be a dumbass, but I'm afraid I don't know enough yet.

    thanks.

  3. The bottom bracket spindle. Rumor has it that it was made of CP
    titanium. That was in the early 80s when he was on a solo break that
    had a great chance of bringing him victory in one of the northern
    spring semi-classics.

  4. In article <ydMQe.2342$UI.992@okepread05>,

    Sotos said:

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/2005/vuelta05/index.php?id=vuelta052/2_14g

    I saw old Mike Norton (of BOB, not young Mike Norton of YSG-Ideal Tile)
    do this too.

    JT

    Would someone be so kind as to explain exactly what part broke? I can't
    seem to figure out what type of failure would have led to the right side of
    the crankset being all caddywampus such as it appears.

    Shimano's got some 'splainin to do. This is one of their new (well, 3
    years or so now) crank designs where the crank spindle is permanently
    attached to the right (spider-side) crank, and the left crank is held on
    using two pinch bolts and fine splines.

    This seems to be either a failure of the pinch bolts (could even be
    mechanic error if that is the cause) or a broken spindle. If the spindle
    broke, it would have to be right at the crank end, because we can't see
    any broken bit of spindle still attached to the left crank, and this
    photo gives us perfect position to see such.

    So my best guess is that the pinch bolts failed, either due to
    overtightening, undertightening, or some failure of the parts (either
    bolt or crank. But a spindle failure is possible.

    Apologies for the PDF, but this is a good diagram of the assembly:

    http://tinyurl.com/7ssz9

    http://bike.shimano.com/media/cycling/techdocs/en/bikecomponents/FC/EV-FC
    -7800-2251_v2_m56577569830565939.pdf

    Share & Enjoy,

    --
    Ryan Cousineau [email hidden] http://www.wiredcola.com/
    "I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
    to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.