Road Cycling · Public discussion

L'Equipe: Armstrong Positif!

Started by Robert Chung · · Last activity · 15 posts · 482 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
23 August 2005
Last activity
24 August 2005
Original author
Robert Chung
Posts
15
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
482
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–15 of 15
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://lequipe.fr/Cyclisme/DOPAGE_ARMSTRONG.html

  2. Robert Chung said:

    http://lequipe.fr/Cyclisme/DOPAGE_ARMSTRONG.html

    A story in English:
    http://foxsports.news.com.au/story/0,8659,16357449-23218,00.html

  3. Robert Chung said:
    Robert Chung said:

    http://lequipe.fr/Cyclisme/DOPAGE_ARMSTRONG.html

    A story in English:
    http://foxsports.news.com.au/story/0,8659,16357449-23218,00.html

    "Of course it cannot be regarded as a positive test in the strict regulatory
    sense."

    In other words, this is a virtual positive.

    Ron

  4. RonSonic schreef:

    Quoted message said:

    In other words, this is a virtual positive.

    Ron

    So what is the count then for Jan's virtual Tour wins? Remember he already netted
    the Riis Tour.

  5. RonSonic said:

    In other words, this is a virtual positive.

    Nice.

  6. "RonSonic" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 08:23:00 +0200, "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Robert Chung said:

    http://lequipe.fr/Cyclisme/DOPAGE_ARMSTRONG.html

    A story in English:
    http://foxsports.news.com.au/story/0,8659,16357449-23218,00.html

    "Of course it cannot be regarded as a positive test in the strict
    regulatory
    sense."

    In other words, this is a virtual positive.

    In other words, it's meaningless.

  7. RonSonic said:

    "Of course it cannot be regarded as a positive test in the strict regulatory
    sense."

    In other words, this is a virtual positive.

    WADA's drug testing procedures and their so-called confidentiality of
    results are a complete joke. Why the athletes don't assert their rights
    against these thugs and the media thugs is inexplicable.

    CP

  8. "Jim Flom " <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:v0HOe.152306$wr.60848@clgrps12...

    Quoted message said:

    "RonSonic" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 08:23:00 +0200, "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Robert Chung wrote:
    > http://lequipe.fr/Cyclisme/DOPAGE_ARMSTRONG.html

    A story in English:
    http://foxsports.news.com.au/story/0,8659,16357449-23218,00.html

    "Of course it cannot be regarded as a positive test in the strict
    regulatory
    sense."

    In other words, this is a virtual positive.

    In other words, it's meaningless.

    Hardly. See CyclingNews
    http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2005/aug05/aug23news3

    I bet that the Texas insurance company now seeks recovery of all the bonuses
    they've paid to Armstrong.

  9. "B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Jim Flom " <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:v0HOe.152306$wr.60848@clgrps12...

    Quoted message said:

    "RonSonic" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 08:23:00 +0200, "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    >Robert Chung wrote:
    >> http://lequipe.fr/Cyclisme/DOPAGE_ARMSTRONG.html
    >
    >A story in English:
    >http://foxsports.news.com.au/story/0,8659,16357449-23218,00.html
    >

    "Of course it cannot be regarded as a positive test in the strict
    regulatory
    sense."

    In other words, this is a virtual positive.

    In other words, it's meaningless.

    Hardly. See CyclingNews
    http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2005/aug05/aug23news3

    I bet that the Texas insurance company now seeks recovery of all the
    bonuses they've paid to Armstrong.

    You bet? How much?

  10. "Jim Flom " <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:19OOe.205889$HI.199893@edtnps84...

    Quoted message said:

    "B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Jim Flom " <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:v0HOe.152306$wr.60848@clgrps12...

    Quoted message said:

    "RonSonic" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    > On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 08:23:00 +0200, "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]>
    > wrote:
    >
    >>Robert Chung wrote:
    >>> http://lequipe.fr/Cyclisme/DOPAGE_ARMSTRONG.html
    >>
    >>A story in English:
    >>http://foxsports.news.com.au/story/0,8659,16357449-23218,00.html
    >>
    >
    >
    > "Of course it cannot be regarded as a positive test in the strict
    > regulatory
    > sense."
    >
    > In other words, this is a virtual positive.

    In other words, it's meaningless.

    Hardly. See CyclingNews
    http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2005/aug05/aug23news3

    I bet that the Texas insurance company now seeks recovery of all the
    bonuses they've paid to Armstrong.

    You bet? How much?

    If I win you leave the ministry. If you win, I won't post anything about
    Armstrong for six months. Bet?

  11. "B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Jim Flom " <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:19OOe.205889$HI.199893@edtnps84...

    Quoted message said:

    "B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Jim Flom " <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:v0HOe.152306$wr.60848@clgrps12...
    > "RonSonic" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    > news:[email hidden]...
    >> On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 08:23:00 +0200, "Robert Chung"
    >> <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >>
    >>>Robert Chung wrote:
    >>>> http://lequipe.fr/Cyclisme/DOPAGE_ARMSTRONG.html
    >>>
    >>>A story in English:
    >>>http://foxsports.news.com.au/story/0,8659,16357449-23218,00.html
    >>>
    >>
    >>
    >> "Of course it cannot be regarded as a positive test in the strict
    >> regulatory
    >> sense."
    >>
    >> In other words, this is a virtual positive.
    >
    > In other words, it's meaningless.

    Hardly. See CyclingNews
    http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2005/aug05/aug23news3

    I bet that the Texas insurance company now seeks recovery of all the
    bonuses they've paid to Armstrong.

    You bet? How much?

    If I win you leave the ministry. If you win, I won't post anything about
    Armstrong for six months. Bet?

    lololol Hey -- I'm going to be in Philly this weekend. Come on down and
    we'll talk Goedel over a beer.

  12. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Robert Chung said:

    http://lequipe.fr/Cyclisme/DOPAGE_ARMSTRONG.html

    Hey! Armstrong has the same color bar tape as I.

    --
    Michael Press

  13. In article <[email hidden]>,

    RonSonic said:
    Robert Chung said:
    Robert Chung said:

    http://lequipe.fr/Cyclisme/DOPAGE_ARMSTRONG.html

    A story in English:
    http://foxsports.news.com.au/story/0,8659,16357449-23218,00.html

    "Of course it cannot be regarded as a positive test in the strict regulatory
    sense."

    In other words, this is a virtual positive.

    You're just lucky the linguini did not exit my nose.

    --
    Michael Press

  14. In article
    <[email hidden]>,

    Quoted message said:
    RonSonic said:

    "Of course it cannot be regarded as a positive test in the strict regulatory
    sense."

    In other words, this is a virtual positive.

    WADA's drug testing procedures and their so-called confidentiality of
    results are a complete joke. Why the athletes don't assert their rights
    against these thugs and the media thugs is inexplicable.

    Exactly the same reason they wear the funny head gear.

    --
    Michael Press

  15. "Jim Flom " <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:apROe.212453$tt5.49433@edtnps90...

    Quoted message said:

    "B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Jim Flom " <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:19OOe.205889$HI.199893@edtnps84...

    Quoted message said:

    "B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    >
    > "Jim Flom " <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    > news:v0HOe.152306$wr.60848@clgrps12...
    >> "RonSonic" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    >> news:[email hidden]...
    >>> On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 08:23:00 +0200, "Robert Chung"
    >>> <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >>>
    >>>>Robert Chung wrote:
    >>>>> http://lequipe.fr/Cyclisme/DOPAGE_ARMSTRONG.html
    >>>>
    >>>>A story in English:
    >>>>http://foxsports.news.com.au/story/0,8659,16357449-23218,00.html
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> "Of course it cannot be regarded as a positive test in the strict
    >>> regulatory
    >>> sense."
    >>>
    >>> In other words, this is a virtual positive.
    >>
    >> In other words, it's meaningless.
    >
    > Hardly. See CyclingNews
    > http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2005/aug05/aug23news3
    >
    > I bet that the Texas insurance company now seeks recovery of all the
    > bonuses they've paid to Armstrong.

    You bet? How much?

    If I win you leave the ministry. If you win, I won't post anything about
    Armstrong for six months. Bet?

    lololol Hey -- I'm going to be in Philly this weekend. Come on down
    and we'll talk Goedel over a beer.

    I'd love to, but it's not a good weekend at my end. Email me your
    schedule--maybe next week?

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.