UK and Europe · Public discussion

Cycle to work scheme

Started by peacock suit · · Last activity · 15 posts · 427 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
23 August 2005
Last activity
18 September 2005
Original author
peacock suit
Posts
15
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
427
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–15 of 15
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Rumour has it in my workplace that there is a scheme that will allow
    employers to provide bikes for employees at half price with deductions
    coming from your wages.

    Is this true and how do we apply

  2. peacock suit said:

    Rumour has it in my workplace that there is a scheme that will allow
    employers to provide bikes for employees at half price with deductions
    coming from your wages.

    Is this true and how do we apply

    There is such a scheme (known as IR176). Your employer may be
    implementing it, and teh precise details you should find out from your
    employer.

    Broadly speaking it works like this:

    Your employer buys a bike and accessories for commuting.
    You pay the employer a mutually agreed amount per month out of gross
    salary for the use of the bike.
    After a period of time you can purchase the bike from teh employer at a
    peppercorn rate, effectively nothing.

    The savings come from paying no tax or NI on the portion of your wages
    that go to the employer. The employer can also deduct VAT in some
    cases. The employer also does not have to pay NI on the amount
    deducted.

    Exactly how this is implemented will be up to your employer so ask
    them.

    ...d

  3. peacock suit said:

    Rumour has it in my workplace that there is a scheme that will allow
    employers to provide bikes for employees at half price with deductions
    coming from your wages.

    Is this true and how do we apply


    As far as I'm aware, there are companies which will administer the scheme
    on behalf of your employers.
    http://www.booost.uk.com/

  4. "peacock suit" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Rumour has it in my workplace that there is a scheme that will allow
    employers to provide bikes for employees at half price with deductions
    coming from your wages.

    Is this true and how do we apply

    http://www.booost.uk.com/employees/next/

    --
    Simon Mason
    http://www.simonmason.karoo.net

  5. There was an advert in AtoB this month from an organization/company who
    can help companies set this scheme up for employers. I cant remember
    the name of the company.

  6. stupot said:

    There was an advert in AtoB this month from an organization/company who
    can help companies set this scheme up for employers. I cant remember
    the name of the company.

    http://www.cyclescheme.co.uk

    --
    Tony

    "I did make a mistake once - I thought I'd made a mistake but I hadn't"
    Anon

  7. David Martin said:


    After a period of time you can purchase the bike from teh employer at a
    peppercorn rate, effectively nothing.

    Not quite. You must pay either a fair market value or tax/NI on the
    difference between fair market value and what you paid. Its one of the
    hidden catches that make it not quite as good as it seems. For a
    Brompton that holds its value, its a lousy deal. For some bikes that
    depreciate heavily so they are worth much less than half their original
    value, it could be worthwhile.

    Cyclescheme note "A fair market value payment may be required to end the
    lease if you want to make the bike yours"

    The bike is supposed to be used mainly for journeys to and from work as
    well.

    --
    Tony

    "I did make a mistake once - I thought I'd made a mistake but I hadn't"
    Anon

  8. Tony Raven said:
    David Martin said:


    After a period of time you can purchase the bike from teh employer at a
    peppercorn rate, effectively nothing.

    Not quite. You must pay either a fair market value or tax/NI on the
    difference between fair market value and what you paid. Its one of the
    hidden catches that make it not quite as good as it seems. For a
    Brompton that holds its value, its a lousy deal. For some bikes that
    depreciate heavily so they are worth much less than half their original
    value, it could be worthwhile.

    Not strictly true. 'fair market value' in this context was clarified in
    the budget to being in accordance with typical depreciation rates (ie
    three years to zero value) and would not be challenged unless blatent
    abuse was being made. So three years for a brompton would be fine.
    three months however would be pushing it. Three days would be taking
    the proverbial.

    Quoted message said:

    Cyclescheme note "A fair market value payment may be required to end the
    lease if you want to make the bike yours"

    Indeed. It is the definition of 'fair market value' which has been
    clarified.

    Quoted message said:

    The bike is supposed to be used mainly for journeys to and from work as
    well.

    or be your main method of getting to work.

    ...d

  9. David Martin said:

    Indeed. It is the definition of 'fair market value' which has been
    clarified.

    Its well understood in tax and benefits circles. Its what someone would
    likely pay for it if it were offered on an open market. So for a
    Brompton three years old it would be tough to argue is was worth much
    less than £300 because that and more is what they regularly sell for
    second hand. Its certainly not the peppercorn £1 that has been suggested.

    --
    Tony

    "I did make a mistake once - I thought I'd made a mistake but I hadn't"
    Anon

  10. Tony Raven said:
    David Martin said:

    Indeed. It is the definition of 'fair market value' which has been
    clarified.

    Its well understood in tax and benefits circles. Its what someone would
    likely pay for it if it were offered on an open market. So for a
    Brompton three years old it would be tough to argue is was worth much
    less than £300 because that and more is what they regularly sell for
    second hand. Its certainly not the peppercorn £1 that has been suggested.

    This can however be worked around. There are two provisions. Firstly
    you must have no right to buy the equipment, otherwise it is a
    Hire-purchase agreement rather than a hire and is then not eligible.
    Secondly, the loan can be indefinite, so after paying a certain amount
    to the employer through a salary sacrifice you can retain the equipment
    on permanent, free loan until such time as the employer decides
    otherwise.

    So you can in effect buy a bike, but it isn't yours. As soon as the
    bike is sold, then VAT is incurred, however any compensation due the
    employer for non-completion of a hire agreement is not liable for VAT.

    It would be a good scheme if you are intending to stay with one
    employer long enough for the bike to drop sufficiently in value.
    Unfortunately the issues regarding maintenance and spares could be more
    interesting.

    How much is a second hand brompton worth with no brake cables, worn out
    brake blocks and perished tyres with punctures in? One could perhaps
    reasonably recover the cost of the parts provided under maintenance
    from the final purchase price.

    The other thing to note is that there is a de-facto upper limit of
    1000GBP (but no limit on the number of bicycles) unless the employer
    has their own consumer credit act license.

    Tis not quite as clear cut as one might like, and problematic if you
    are in a field where jobs are regularly changed.

    ...d

  11. David Martin said:

    The other thing to note is that there is a de-facto upper limit of
    1000GBP (but no limit on the number of bicycles) unless the employer
    has their own consumer credit act license.

    Tis not quite as clear cut as one might like, and problematic if you
    are in a field where jobs are regularly changed.

    I am sure you can find creative solutions and I am sure a number of
    small willing employers will simply hope its not picked up. But it is
    an issue and one that the scheme promoters skip over rather quickly. So
    you need to be aware that it is not necessarily the good deal you
    think it is unless someone is prepared to bend the rules a little. A
    bit like smuggling a bike back through Customs, you will likely get away
    with it if everyone turns a blind eye but you cannot rely on it.

    --
    Tony

    "I did make a mistake once - I thought I'd made a mistake but I hadn't"
    Anon

  12. in message <[email hidden]>, John Hearns

    (') said:
    peacock suit said:

    Rumour has it in my workplace that there is a scheme that will allow
    employers to provide bikes for employees at half price with deductions
    coming from your wages.

    Is this true and how do we apply


    As far as I'm aware, there are companies which will administer the
    scheme on behalf of your employers.
    http://www.booost.uk.com/

    There are, but you are not obliged to use them and they are not good
    value for money.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    ;; Want to know what SCO stands for?
    ;; http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20030605

  13. "David Martin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Tony Raven said:
    David Martin said:

    Indeed. It is the definition of 'fair market value' which has been
    clarified.

    Its well understood in tax and benefits circles. Its what someone would
    likely pay for it if it were offered on an open market. So for a
    Brompton three years old it would be tough to argue is was worth much
    less than £300 because that and more is what they regularly sell for
    second hand. Its certainly not the peppercorn £1 that has been suggested.

    This can however be worked around. There are two provisions. Firstly
    you must have no right to buy the equipment, otherwise it is a
    Hire-purchase agreement rather than a hire and is then not eligible.
    Secondly, the loan can be indefinite, so after paying a certain amount
    to the employer through a salary sacrifice you can retain the equipment
    on permanent, free loan until such time as the employer decides
    otherwise.

    So you can in effect buy a bike, but it isn't yours. As soon as the
    bike is sold, then VAT is incurred, however any compensation due the
    employer for non-completion of a hire agreement is not liable for VAT.

    It would be a good scheme if you are intending to stay with one
    employer long enough for the bike to drop sufficiently in value.
    Unfortunately the issues regarding maintenance and spares could be more
    interesting.

    How much is a second hand brompton worth with no brake cables, worn out
    brake blocks and perished tyres with punctures in? One could perhaps
    reasonably recover the cost of the parts provided under maintenance
    from the final purchase price.

    The other thing to note is that there is a de-facto upper limit of
    1000GBP (but no limit on the number of bicycles) unless the employer
    has their own consumer credit act license.

    Tis not quite as clear cut as one might like, and problematic if you
    are in a field where jobs are regularly changed.

    My employer is doing something similar with computers. Only fly in the
    ointment we can see is, someone coming up for retirement, having made a
    salary sacrifice, has his pension calculated on final salary.

    ****Don't do it if it means the scheme will still be active in your final
    year in employment**** (unless you aim to peg out very soon after
    retirement).

    ---
    IanH

  14. ian henden said:

    My employer is doing something similar with computers. Only fly in the
    ointment we can see is, someone coming up for retirement, having made a
    salary sacrifice, has his pension calculated on final salary.

    ****Don't do it if it means the scheme will still be active in your final
    year in employment**** (unless you aim to peg out very soon after
    retirement).

    Check the terms of your pension scheme. Mine specifically allows the
    highest annual salary (inflation corrected) in the n years before
    retirement (could be up to 5, can't remember without checking the
    bumpf) to be taken, as long as sufficient contributions have been made
    beforehand. This allows for gradual downgearing towards returement with
    no loss of pension.

    ...d

  15. "David Martin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    ian henden said:

    My employer is doing something similar with computers. Only fly in the
    ointment we can see is, someone coming up for retirement, having made a
    salary sacrifice, has his pension calculated on final salary.

    ****Don't do it if it means the scheme will still be active in your final
    year in employment**** (unless you aim to peg out very soon after
    retirement).

    Check the terms of your pension scheme. Mine specifically allows the
    highest annual salary (inflation corrected) in the n years before
    retirement (could be up to 5, can't remember without checking the
    bumpf) to be taken, as long as sufficient contributions have been made
    beforehand. This allows for gradual downgearing towards returement with
    no loss of pension.


    You are probbly dead right, and, since there are many different pension
    schemes out there, anyone taking on this "salary sacrifice" scheme near
    retirement age needs to do just that - check pension implications.

    OTOH, the "reduction" - sacrificed amount - might be quite useful where one
    needs to minimise their income - where CSA are involved, for example, or to
    fall within some benefits thresholds .....

    --
    IanH

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.