Cycling Training · Public discussion

Turbo / Time trial

Started by TipsterMan · · Last activity · 3 posts · 1,153 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Training
Published
16 August 2005
Last activity
17 August 2005
Original author
TipsterMan
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,153
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I've been training on my i-magic for three weeks (haven't got a road bike yet - just using an old one for turboing) and wanted to see how I'm doing so I set up a flat course of 10.42 miles and set about seeing how fast I could do it.

    It came out at 29:46, passing the 10 mile stage at 28:22. I stayed in the 53-17 gear (lightweight that I am) and averaged a cadence of 93 rpm. Average power was 169w.

    Obviously I can use that as a benchmark time and do the same course another time under the same conditions.

    Anyway, I know this isn't *real* cycling but I wondered how close to reality that might be?

    Tony

  2. TipsterMan said:

    I've been training on my i-magic for three weeks (haven't got a road bike yet - just using an old one for turboing) and wanted to see how I'm doing so I set up a flat course of 10.42 miles and set about seeing how fast I could do it.

    It came out at 29:46, passing the 10 mile stage at 28:22. I stayed in the 53-17 gear (lightweight that I am) and averaged a cadence of 93 rpm. Average power was 169w.

    Obviously I can use that as a benchmark time and do the same course another time under the same conditions.

    Anyway, I know this isn't *real* cycling but I wondered how close to reality that might be?

    Tony


    I'm unsure of the calibration and repeatability with that product but given your reported power, assuming average aerodynamics and 85kg bike + rider weight ..... plus a few other defaults from www.analyticcycling.com and NO wind ....

    Effective Frontal Area (0.4 to 0.7 is typical).m2Drag Coefficient (Use default value).Air Density (or Air Density from Temperature, Barometric Pressure, and altitude).kg/m3 Sea Level 1.2261500 Meters 1.0563000 Meters 0.905Weight of Rider and Bike.kgCoefficient of Rolling Resistance. Wooden Track0.001Smooth Concrete0.002Asphalt Road0.004Rough but Paved Road0.008Slope.Rise/Run (decimal)Power.watts
    yields an estimated speed of 9.4 m/s. That's close to your time over 10 miles (unless I screwed up the math).

    rmur

  3. rmur17 said:

    I'm unsure of the calibration and repeatability with that product but given your reported power, assuming average aerodynamics and 85kg bike + rider weight ..... plus a few other defaults from www.analyticcycling.com and NO wind ....

    Effective Frontal Area (0.4 to 0.7 is typical).m2Drag Coefficient (Use default value).Air Density (or Air Density from Temperature, Barometric Pressure, and altitude).kg/m3 Sea Level 1.2261500 Meters 1.0563000 Meters 0.905Weight of Rider and Bike.kgCoefficient of Rolling Resistance. Wooden Track0.001Smooth Concrete0.002Asphalt Road0.004Rough but Paved Road0.008Slope.Rise/Run (decimal)Power.watts
    yields an estimated speed of 9.4 m/s. That's close to your time over 10 miles (unless I screwed up the math).

    rmur


    Thanks for that rmur, that's interesting. Tacx do claim that the i-magic is as close to real life cycling as a turbo trainer can be.

    Anyone else got experience of the i-magic?

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.