rec.sport.unicycling · Public discussion

holders of bearing holders?

Started by goldenchicken II · · Last activity · 17 posts · 836 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
rec.sport.unicycling
Published
6 August 2005
Last activity
11 August 2005
Original author
goldenchicken II
Posts
17
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
836
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–17 of 17
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. From where can a home builder buy machined bearing holders?

    --
    goldenchicken II - There is more to cycling

    Olaf Johansson
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    goldenchicken II's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/10248
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/42420

  2. Good question. Twice I've sawed them off a damaged frame to use in my
    new ones. But I'd like to get some as well.

    --
    unisk8r - One Wheel Wander
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    unisk8r's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/4660
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/42420

  3. goldenchicken II said:

    *Here perhaps?

    http://www.staffordmfg.com/ *

    Or 'McMaster-Carr' (http://www.mcmaster.com/)

    The shaft collar is the more common option for a DIY machined bearing
    holder. George Barnes uses a machined shaft collar for his frames. DM
    used a shaft collar for the Vortex frame. They're not ideal cause
    they're a little heavy for what you need and some can be a bit thin
    where the bolt head is countersunk meaning that there can be very little
    metal supporting the area under the bolt head. Depends on the make of
    the shaft collar.

    Here's a thread that talks about 'bearing holders'
    (http://tinyurl.com/3w6n3).

    Steve Howard has also used shaft collars for his steel unicycles.
    Here's one thread where he talks about his 'stainless steel muni
    project' (http://tinyurl.com/d2paw). Steve's gallery has pictures of
    the shaft collar being machined but the gallery is down right now so I
    can't link you there. Steve's main gallery page is at
    http://www.unicyclist.com/gallery/showard

    --
    john_childs - Guinness Mojo

    john_childs (att) hotmail (dott) com
    Gallery: '' (http://gallery.unicyclist.com/john_childs)
    ' Unicycling Bookmark List' (http://backcountry.unicyclist.com/) ::
    'World Clock' (http://tinyurl.com/a99y3) >>>'Click Me'
    (http://tinyurl.com/7lvbu)<<<
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    john_childs's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/449
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/42420

  4. In the UK I use Farnell for some personal orders. As I can't read
    Swedish I don't know if this option is available to you but here is a
    link to a 40mm 2pc collar:

    http://tinyurl.com/bkhcm

    It seems very easy to buy shaft collars over the web in the US, and
    other metal items, but very difficult in the UK.

    Regards

    Keith

    --
    keg - Getting fitter
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    keg's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/212
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/42420

  5. Thanks for all the good links. Through them I managed to find a dealer
    even in my home town!

    I wonder why people have found it necessary to bore out a lip preventing
    the frame to slip radially on the bearing surface. These collars seem to
    be made for industrial use - won't they clamp tight enough not to slip
    without a lip?

    --
    goldenchicken II - There is more to cycling

    Olaf Johansson
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    goldenchicken II's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/10248
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/42420

  6. goldenchicken II said:

    *I wonder why people have found it necessary to bore out a lip
    preventing the frame to slip radially on the bearing surface. These
    collars seem to be made for industrial use - won't they clamp tight
    enough not to slip without a lip? *

    You don't want to clamp it down too tight as that will make the bearings
    move less freely and will also wear out the bearings quicker.

    --
    Gilby - Unicyclist.com Webmaster
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Gilby's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/1
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/42420

  7. I haven't measured the torque used however I tighten them with a ball
    ended allen key (screwdriver style handle) and I doubt it is any higher
    than with the standard pressed bearing holders.

    Saying that I generally braze a small lip of steel on the outside of the
    shaft collars, this is easier for me than getting undersized collars and
    boaring out to leave a lip.

    Keith

    --
    keg - Getting fitter
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    keg's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/212
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/42420

  8. Gilby said:

    *You don't want to clamp it down too tight as that will make the
    bearings move less freely and will also wear out the bearings quicker.
    Though that's probably less of an issue with good machined bearing
    holders. *

    With an ID of 40 mm (equal as the bearing's OD) I believed the shaft
    collars couldn't be tightened so much that they prevent the axle from
    rotating freely ...

    --
    goldenchicken II - There is more to cycling

    Olaf Johansson
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    goldenchicken II's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/10248
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/42420

  9. keg said:

    *I haven't measured the torque used however I tighten them with a ball
    ended allen key (screwdriver style handle) and I doubt it is any
    higher than with the standard pressed bearing holders.

    Saying that I generally braze a small lip of steel on the outside of
    the shaft collars, this is easier for me than getting undersized
    collars and boaring out to leave a lip.

    Keith *

    The brazing solution did cross my mind but then I suppose you've got to
    find a collar that is not too wide, just a fraction wider than the
    bearings.

    So you think it is enough having a lip only on one side (the outside)?

    I saw that some collars have grooves on the inside. Find a ball bearing
    with similar grooves on the outside and we could pip the lips ...

    --
    goldenchicken II - There is more to cycling

    Olaf Johansson
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    goldenchicken II's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/10248
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/42420

  10. goldenchicken II said:

    *With an ID of 40 mm (equal as the bearing's OD) I believed the shaft
    collars couldn't be tightened so much that they prevent the axle from
    rotating freely ... *

    Although the inner radius is 40mm the two parts do not make a complete
    circle, if you put both parts together and measured the distance from
    wall to wall you would measure around 37mm. To explain without drawing a
    picture imagine they made a single collar ID 40mm and then cut it in
    half with a 3mm wide saw blade.

    This clearance means you can easily overtighten & crush a bearing.

    So far I have either ignored the lip or brazed on the outside only, this
    makes it much easier to align the wheel during assembly. On my first
    frame I did suffer from a little slippage hence adding a lip.

    --
    keg - Getting fitter
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    keg's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/212
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/42420

  11. keg said:

    *Although the inner radius is 40mm the two parts do not make a
    complete circle, if you put both parts together and measured the
    distance from wall to wall you would measure around 37mm. *

    That does sound a bit discouraging. On my 36" wheel (which is what I
    plan to build the frame around) it is hard to find out how hard to
    tighten the bearing holders. The heavy wheel is not a sensitive
    indicator and it is easy to overtighten, I have noticed.

    --
    goldenchicken II - There is more to cycling

    Olaf Johansson
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    goldenchicken II's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/10248
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/42420

  12. Would this work?

    Instead of welding/brazing the frame tubes directly onto the upper
    bearing holder you weld them onto a 3 mm steel plate which you use for
    bolting a (stock) bearing and its house (plummer block type). Such
    housings can be found in aluminium or polymer. The bolts could perhaps
    be of QR type.

    The benefit would be having a proper bearing housing that is not giving
    any slip or flexing. Haven't found a suitable one yet though.

    +----------------------------------------------------------------+
    | Attachment filename: unibearing.gif |
    |Download attachment: http://www.unicyclist.com/attachment/346784|
    +----------------------------------------------------------------+

    --
    goldenchicken II - There is more to cycling

    Olaf Johansson
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    goldenchicken II's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/10248
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/42420

  13. keg said:

    *Although the inner radius is 40mm the two parts do not make a
    complete circle, if you put both parts together and measured the
    distance from wall to wall you would measure around 37mm. To explain
    without drawing a picture imagine they made a single collar ID 40mm
    and then cut it in half with a 3mm wide saw blade.

    This clearance means you can easily overtighten & crush a bearing.
    *

    I found the illustration for you ;-)

    The inner diameter of this collar is 40 mm when 's' is 2 mm. I believe
    you would be able to fine tune this measurement with help of washers so
    that tightened the clamp provides a sufficient hold without deforming
    the bearing.

    And, why not put some red lockite on the lower part of the collar?

    All to avoid the trouble of making a lip ...

    +----------------------------------------------------------------+
    | Attachment filename: wns.png |
    |Download attachment: http://www.unicyclist.com/attachment/347379|
    +----------------------------------------------------------------+

    --
    goldenchicken II - There is more to cycling

    Olaf Johansson
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    goldenchicken II's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/10248
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/42420

  14. keg said:

    *Although the inner radius is 40mm the two parts do not make a
    complete circle, if you put both parts together and measured the
    distance from wall to wall you would measure around 37mm. To explain
    without drawing a picture imagine they made a single collar ID 40mm
    and then cut it in half with a 3mm wide saw blade.

    This clearance means you can easily overtighten & crush a bearing.
    *

    I found the illustration for you ;-)

    The inner diameter of this collar is 40 mm when 's' is 2 mm. I believe
    you would be able to fine tune this measurement with help of washers so
    that tightened the clamp provides a sufficient hold without deforming
    the bearing.

    And, why not put some red lockite on the lower part of the collar?

    All to avoid the trouble of making a lip ...

    +----------------------------------------------------------------+
    | Attachment filename: wns.png |
    |Download attachment: http://www.unicyclist.com/attachment/347379|
    +----------------------------------------------------------------+

    --
    goldenchicken II - There is more to cycling

    Olaf Johansson
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    goldenchicken II's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/10248
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/42420

  15. goldenchicken II said:

    I believe you would be able to fine tune this measurement with help of
    washers so that tightened the clamp provides a sufficient hold without
    deforming the bearing.

    I would think you could do a machined collar like that up very tightly
    indeed before it would deform the bearing, as the case of the bearing is
    supported almost all the way round. The cheap pressed bearing holders
    are quite bendy and really only grip the bearing at two points (top and
    bottom) so the middle could spread quite easily.

    Do people who are using machined bearing holders/collars get much
    problem with deformed bearings from overtightening?

    --
    rob.northcott - Need to practise uphill mounts

    You do not need a parachute to skydive. You only need a parachute to
    skydive twice
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    rob.northcott's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/7436
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/42420

  16. rob.northcott said:

    *I would think you could do a machined collar like that up very
    tightly indeed before it would deform the bearing, *

    I am not sure I agree with you. Take another look at the illustration.
    The bearing that goes into that collar has a 40 mm diameter. This is the
    same diameter as the opening of the collar -as long as the distance
    between upper and lower half is 2 mm (where the bolt holes are placed)-.
    If you tighten the parts so they go against each other the hole is no
    longer circular and the diameter will be less then 40 mm.

    So depending on how strong the collar is and how much porridge you ate
    as a child, you could squeeze that bearing inside the collar to be oval.
    Placing washers on the bolts between the two collar parts might be a way
    to adjust the squeeze to perfection ...

    --
    goldenchicken II - There is more to cycling

    Olaf Johansson
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    goldenchicken II's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/10248
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/42420

  17. goldenchicken II said:

    *I am not sure I agree with you. Take another look at the
    illustration. The bearing that goes into that collar has a 40 mm
    diameter. This is the same diameter as the opening of the collar -as
    long as the distance between upper and lower half is 2 mm (where the
    bolt holes are placed)-. If you tighten the parts so they go against
    each other the hole is no longer circular and the diameter will be
    less then 40 mm.

    So depending on how strong the collar is and how much porridge you ate
    as a child, you could squeeze that bearing inside the collar to be
    oval. Placing washers on the bolts between the two collar parts might
    be a way to adjust the squeeze to perfection ... *


    I sincerely doubt that would be a problem; I doubt that you could
    actually deform the bearing by hand with that holder.

    That said, a while ago I came up with 40 ft-inches (same number as
    cranks, different units) as a reasonable torque for the bearing
    holders.

    This comment applies only to the nearly-completely circular type, not
    the main-cap type of bearing holder.

    --
    U-Turn - Cool water for the flame

    Weep in the dojo... laugh on the battlefield.
    'LiveWire Unicycles' (http://www.livewireunicycles.com)
    'Strongest Coker Wheel in the World'
    (http://www.unicyclist.com/gallery/albup39)
    '29er Tire Study' (http://u-turn.unicyclist.com/29erTireStudy/)
    'New York Unicycle Club' (http://www.newyorkunicycle.com)
    -- Dave Stockton
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    U-Turn's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/691
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/42420

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.