Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Re: Sharp Cornering Bike?

Started by Ted Bennett · · Last activity · 3 posts · 475 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
6 August 2005
Last activity
25 August 2005
Original author
Ted Bennett
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
475
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Quoted message said:

    Frame geometry can affect handling.

    Trials bikes are designed for quick handling at low-speed,
    so they don't do well at high speed down a ski-run in
    summer.

    Similarly, Hans Rey doesn't use a longer wheelbase touring
    bicycle to leap on and off picnic tables and cavort among
    boulders.

    There's not a lot of difference in the geometry seen in
    bicycles used for the same kind of racing.

    In any case, cornering is rarely emphasized in paved bicycle
    races because the engine tends to be far more important.

    There just isn't the fiddling with front-end geometry,
    suspension, and tire compounds that you see in motorcycle
    racing.

    Bicyclists don't like to change their front ends, suspension
    is absent from road bicycles, <big snip>

    Carl, I am compelled to pick a nit here. Road bikes most certainly do
    have suspension: the air contained in the flexible tires. A short ride
    on a bike with solid tires will be convincing.

    In addition to that, the rider's legs provide an excellent suspension as
    they can magically turn most of the rider's weight into suspended
    weight. You may argue that the rider's legs can hardly be considered
    part of the bike. You would be correct, but what's the use of a bike
    without a rider?

    --
    Ted Bennett

  2. Ted Bennett said:


    Quoted message said:

    Dear Ted,

    Er, in your haste to pick your nit, you snipped this:

    "And tire inflation is about as close as pavement bicycles
    get to suspension."

    Drat! Itchy trigger finger.

    Quoted message said:

    But I've gotten excited myself before I finished posts, so I
    really shouldn't complain.

    And I do like your point about the rider's legs acting as
    suspension, although a lot of cornering pictures show the
    rider pretty much with his outside leg down and stiff--much
    of the time, the magic is more potential than actual.

    However, the original poster was asking what difference a
    particular bike would make in cornering, so he's probably
    going to rule your leg-suspension point out, even though I
    like it.

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

    Nicely put. I would encourage those afflicted with the stiff-leg
    syndrome to try to relax more on the bike by putting the pedals fore and
    aft. Works in corners well, at least for the ones you coast through.

    I agree with "Jim Beam" that various bikes will handle differently, for
    many interesting reasons. Whether those differences make any real
    difference in the fastest time through the turn (one testable aspect of
    handling), is open to question.

    Ted

    Dear Ted,

    If there are indeed real differences in cornering speed due
    to the equipment, I suspect that the rider will be mistaken
    about which combination is the fastest because we usually
    confuse sensation and duration.

    It's notorious how often seasoned car and motorcycle racers
    are mistaken about the speed effects of equipment changes.
    The differences are usually so tiny that the mechanics have
    to show them the stopwatches before any intelligent
    decisions can be made.

    As Lennard Zinn pointed out in his explanation of how
    increased tire pressure can paradoxically lead to greater
    rolling resistance by increased bouncing, a rougher (or
    squirrellier) ride is easily confused with going faster.

    Unfortunately, bicycles are extremely sensitive to even
    slight wind changes and have dreadfully feeble, variable
    engines, so our cornering speeds are likely to remain
    unmeasured in any useful way.

    If anyone knows of some tests to the contrary, I'd love to
    be embarrassed by them. There are raw tire-friction tests,
    but I don't know of any link to someone going through the
    same twisty pylons (like Consumer Reports) on numerous
    different bicycles. Single-track vehicles don't lend
    themselves to this sort of thing, the rider being so
    variable and so important.

    Carl Fogel

  3. Quoted message said:

    If anyone knows of some tests to the contrary, I'd love to
    be embarrassed by them. There are raw tire-friction tests,
    but I don't know of any link to someone going through the
    same twisty pylons (like Consumer Reports) on numerous
    different bicycles. Single-track vehicles don't lend
    themselves to this sort of thing, the rider being so
    variable and so important.

    One easy way to rule out engine performance is by doing it on a slope,
    without pedalling. A way to rule out wind -- do it inside, there are
    plenty of convention centers or sports arenas with enough room.

    Then you are still left with rider skill, but this just requires
    sufficient runs.

    Jasper

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.