Science Forum, the new forum dedicated to science
http://s11.invisionfree.com/science/
Come and register
General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion
Science Forum
This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- General fitness, health and nutrition
- Published
- 28 July 2005
- Last activity
- 30 July 2005
- Original author
- Email address hidden
- Posts
- 11
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 295
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
Um with the exception of myself, the collective IQ of this group
doesn't even make it into double digits. I doubt they could read your
message, nevermind understand how to signup. -
I'm for it! said:
Um with the exception of myself, the collective IQ of this group
doesn't even make it into double digits. I doubt they could read your
message, nevermind understand how to signup.What? Use smaller words please.
- bc
-
In article <[email hidden]>,
bc said:
I'm for it! said:
Um with the exception of myself, the collective IQ of this group
doesn't even make it into double digits. I doubt they could read your
message, nevermind understand how to signup.What? Use smaller words please.
Ridiculous! Our _average_ IQ is 168. With a SD of about 1 point.
--
Keith -
Quoted message said:
Ridiculous! Our _average_ IQ is 168.>
Yes, but that's all 3,976 of you added together.
-
I'm for it! said:
Quoted message said:
Ridiculous! Our _average_ IQ is 168.>
Yes, but that's all 3,976 of you added together.
So much for IFI's understanding of average or standard deviation. Are
there really that many of us?- bc
-
Quoted message said:
So much for IFI's understanding of average or standard deviation. Are
there really that many of us?>When you (I) inject humor, accuracy flies out the window.
-
"I'm for it!" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Um with the exception of myself, the collective IQ of this group
doesn't even make it into double digits. I doubt they could read your
message, nevermind understand how to signup.pretty lines...
Quoted message said:
-
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:22:41 -0600, Hobbes <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
In article <[email hidden]>,
bc said:
I'm for it! said:
Um with the exception of myself, the collective IQ of this group
doesn't even make it into double digits. I doubt they could read your
message, nevermind understand how to signup.What? Use smaller words please.
Ridiculous! Our _average_ IQ is 168. With a SD of about 1 point.
158, unless we have gapped-up in our intelligence growth curve again.
--
Is this thing on? -
-
Joe Humble said:
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:22:41 -0600, Hobbes <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
In article <[email hidden]>,
bc said:
I'm for it! wrote:
> Um with the exception of myself, the collective IQ of this group
> doesn't even make it into double digits. I doubt they could read your
> message, nevermind understand how to signup.What? Use smaller words please.
Ridiculous! Our _average_ IQ is 168. With a SD of about 1 point.
158, unless we have gapped-up in our intelligence growth curve again.
Oh, we thought you'd left, Mike, so we recalculated, and the mean
score went up ten points.
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.