Sure has a lot of time to be on a newsgroup, being such an important cancer
researcher and all. I wonder if he includes his Usenet history with his
grant application? Perhaps someone should forward it to the grant folks. You
know, just so that everything is in the clear and on the up and up. What do
you all think?
I have stopped opening any of his posts, but I still notice that he is quite
prolific.
General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion
orac
This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- General fitness, health and nutrition
- Published
- 23 January 2004
- Last activity
- 25 January 2004
- Original author
- mdd
- Posts
- 8
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 240
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
"mdd" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Sure has a lot of time to be on a newsgroup, being such an important
cancerQuoted message said:
researcher and all. I wonder if he includes his Usenet history with his
grant application? Perhaps someone should forward it to the grant folks.
YouQuoted message said:
know, just so that everything is in the clear and on the up and up. What
doQuoted message said:
you all think?
I have stopped opening any of his posts, but I still notice that he is
quiteQuoted message said:
prolific.
Why would you do that? I thought only skeptics were supposed to be so
closed-minded as to be unable to cope with contrary opinion. Never mind.
There are plenty of heavily censored 'alternative' mailing lists that should
be right up your alley.Peter Moran.
-
In article
<[email hidden]
..au>,Peter Moran said:
"mdd" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Sure has a lot of time to be on a newsgroup, being such an important
cancerQuoted message said:
researcher and all. I wonder if he includes his Usenet history with his
grant application? Perhaps someone should forward it to the grant folks.
YouQuoted message said:
know, just so that everything is in the clear and on the up and up. What
doQuoted message said:
you all think?
I have stopped opening any of his posts, but I still notice that he is
quiteQuoted message said:
prolific.
Why would you do that? I thought only skeptics were supposed to be so
closed-minded as to be unable to cope with contrary opinion. Never mind.
There are plenty of heavily censored 'alternative' mailing lists that should
be right up your alley.It's also amusing to see the way mdd is trying to provoke me into
revealing more about myself. After all, if he's not reading my posts
anymore, why does he care enough about my posting habits to needle me
about them? ;-)--
Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
|
|"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
| inconvenience me with questions?" -
I have no problem with contrary opinions. I simply do not wish to read what
certain [censored] have to post. Nothing new.
"Peter Moran" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
"mdd" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Sure has a lot of time to be on a newsgroup, being such an important
cancerQuoted message said:
researcher and all. I wonder if he includes his Usenet history with his
grant application? Perhaps someone should forward it to the grant folks.
YouQuoted message said:
know, just so that everything is in the clear and on the up and up. What
doQuoted message said:
you all think?
I have stopped opening any of his posts, but I still notice that he is
quiteQuoted message said:
prolific.
Why would you do that? I thought only skeptics were supposed to be so
closed-minded as to be unable to cope with contrary opinion. Never mind.
There are plenty of heavily censored 'alternative' mailing lists that
shouldQuoted message said:
be right up your alley.
Peter Moran.
-
In article <[email hidden]>, "mdd" <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
I have no problem with contrary opinions. I simply do not wish to read what
certain [censored] have to post. Nothing new.Of course, your definition of "[censored]" seems to be anyone who is
strongly critical of your particular viewpoint.--
Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
|
|"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
| inconvenience me with questions?" -
Quoted message said:
"mdd" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Sure has a lot of time to be on a newsgroup, being such an important
cancerQuoted message said:
researcher and all. I wonder if he includes his Usenet history with his
grant application? Perhaps someone should forward it to the grant folks.
YouQuoted message said:
know, just so that everything is in the clear and on the up and up. What
doQuoted message said:
you all think?
I have stopped opening any of his posts, but I still notice that he is
quiteQuoted message said:
prolific.
Why would you do that? I thought only skeptics were supposed to be so
closed-minded as to be unable to cope with contrary opinion.Quoted message said:
Never mind.
There are plenty of heavily censored 'alternative' mailing lists that should
be right up your alley.Especially those dealing with Colonic Irrigation.
Quoted message said:
Peter Moran.
-
Top-posting Soulless Reprobate & Steaming Bag O'Feces said:
I have no problem with contrary opinions. I simply do not wish to read what
certain [censored] have to post. Nothing new.Killfile yourself, then, because you are the most certain [censored].. You'd
really be surprised how much better this (and other) newsgroups are without
top-posting bags of steaming feces.Quoted message said:
"Peter Moran" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden].
com.au...Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
-
"mdd" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
I have no problem with contrary opinions. I simply do not wish to read
whatQuoted message said:
certain [censored] have to post. Nothing new.
So, stop reading your own posts. Sheesh.....
Quoted message said:
"Peter Moran" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
"mdd" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Sure has a lot of time to be on a newsgroup, being such an important
cancerQuoted message said:
researcher and all. I wonder if he includes his Usenet history with
hisQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
grant application? Perhaps someone should forward it to the grant
folks.Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
You
Quoted message said:
know, just so that everything is in the clear and on the up and up.
WhatQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
do
Quoted message said:
you all think?
I have stopped opening any of his posts, but I still notice that he is
quiteQuoted message said:
prolific.
Why would you do that? I thought only skeptics were supposed to be so
closed-minded as to be unable to cope with contrary opinion. Never
mind.Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
There are plenty of heavily censored 'alternative' mailing lists that
shouldQuoted message said:
be right up your alley.
Peter Moran.
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.