rec.sport.unicycling · Public discussion

24" vs 26"

Started by ChangingLINKS.com · · Last activity · 20 posts · 672 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
rec.sport.unicycling
Published
27 July 2005
Last activity
29 July 2005
Original author
ChangingLINKS.com
Posts
20
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
672
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 20
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. What are the benefits of a 24" wheel over a 26"?

    I am considering switching to 26" to gain these benefits:
    Larger tire selection
    Cheapter tires
    More availability at local stores
    Bigger diameter (26" x 3"😉
    Seems lighter
    Easier to get repaired (at bike shops)

    Aside from having a 3" tire (at lighter weight) is there an advantage to
    the 24"?
    I'm guessing it's a tad more durable, and there may be less pinch flats?

    --
    ChangingLINKS.com - member

    Wishing you Happiness, Joy and Laughter,
    Drew Brown
    'Changing LINKS' (http://www.ChangingLINKS.com)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ChangingLINKS.com's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/5468
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/42182

  2. The 24" is far more manouverable in tight spaces or on difficult
    terrain, if the same type of tyre and rim are used it will be lighter
    and therefore easier to hop on. The lower gearing helps steep ascents
    and descents, and the wheel is stronger because the spokes are shorter
    and moments aren't so large.

    --
    kington99 - I HAVE figured out how to change th

    Dave

    - what a thoroughly post-modern subversion of the cycling genre -
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    kington99's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/9417
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/42182

  3. Certainly, on hills, the size of the wheel makes more difference to the
    ease of pedalling than the length of the cranks. I've done direct
    comparisons of a 26 with 170s and a 24 with 150s. The reason is that
    there is an ideal length of crank for each rider (for each style of
    riding).

    Simply lengthening the cranks for more leverage isn't the answer because
    it changes the "engine configuration". Put simply how much easier would
    it be with 300 mm cranks? It would be all but impossible.

    So, for really steep stuff, a 24 will out perform a 26.

    For those who haven't fully understood that wheels were designed to roll
    along the ground, and who seem to feel that unicyclic progress should be
    balistic, the 24 will be lighter than the 26.

    Other than that, the 26 has all of the advantages you listed at the
    start of the thread.

    If I were to design a pure MUni for my own use, it would be a 24 with a
    very fat tyre. For something more general purpose, including longer
    distance and higher speeds, I'd use a 26 with a fat tyre, or possibly a
    29. (What I actually use most often in real life is a 28 with a road
    tyre, but that's because I'm some sort of a crazy weirdo purist.😉 )

    --
    Mikefule - The first cuckoo of unicycling

    Sumer is icomen in, loud sing Mikefule!
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Mikefule's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/879
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/42182

  4. Mike has mentioned nearly all the benefits of 24" over 26". One little
    bit that made a difference to me when I moved from 26" to 24 ", was free
    mounting is a lot easier on a 24".

    Innes

    --
    innes - Unicyclist
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    innes's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/9123
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/42182

  5. I have both a 24x3 muni with a Gazz and a 26x3 muni with a Gazz.

    The 24x3 is more maneuverable and easier to hop or jump with.

    I believe that part of the maneuverability problem with the 26x3 is the
    different tread design on the 26x3 Gazz compared to the 24x3 Gazz. The
    26x3 Gazz is more of a front wheel tire while the 24x3 is more of a rear
    wheel tire. It is more difficult to do a scuffing style turn with the
    26x3 compared to the 24x3. Changing to a different 26x3 tire could
    eliminate or minimize that problem but I haven't tried a different tire
    on that muni yet. Tire choice for a 26x3 probably makes a significant
    difference.

    I hardly ride the 26x3 any more because I have more fun with the 24x3
    and fun is what it's all about. I haven't done any time trial rides to
    determine if the 26x3 is faster than the 24x3. It would be interesting
    to find out if the 26x3 is faster on various trails but I don't know if
    I'll ever get around to that type of testing/comparison. I've got 175's
    on the 26x3. I typically ride with 170's on the 24x3 but also have
    160's for it.

    --
    john_childs - Guinness Mojo

    john_childs (att) hotmail (dott) com
    Gallery: '' (http://gallery.unicyclist.com/john_childs)
    ' Unicycling Bookmark List' (http://backcountry.unicyclist.com/) ::
    'World Clock' (http://tinyurl.com/a99y3) >>>'Click Me'
    (http://tinyurl.com/7lvbu)<<<
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    john_childs's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/449
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/42182

  6. Don't lose sight of the fact that the gap between a (true) 24 and a
    (true) 26 is only 2/24 or 1/12 = 8%.

    That means the wheel is only about 8% bigger, and only travels about 8%
    further per revolution. At MUni speeds (usually under 10 mph) that's
    less than 1 mph difference. Most MUni is not about big distance, and
    most peope out to do big distance will choose a 29 or Coker, or put
    shorter cranks on their 26.

    A 24 fat tyre is about 26 inch rolling diameter. A 26 fat tyre is
    nearer to 28 inches. the difference between these sizes is even smaller
    - 2 inches is a smaller proportion of 26 than it is of 24.

    Which leads me back to one of my general hobby horses that many of the
    differences that people pay so much attention to are little more than
    fine tuning. They are important but... 100 miles of riding hard will
    make many riders 8% better than they were before.

    My own recent experience is instructive. There are certain tracks that
    used to be "defining challenges" on my regular routes - if I made them
    without a UPD then that was good. Things that used to be a defining
    challenge on my 26/150 are now easily achievable on my 28/110, or even
    in some cases on the 28/102 set up. The obstacles haven't got easier -
    I've just got better.

    I recall a book called "Moving Towards Stillness" in which the author
    compared traditional Japanese archery with modern western archery.

    The traditional Japanese archer says, "I cannot hit the target,
    therefore I will look to my technique, and practise until I can," where
    the western archer says, "If I am to hit that target, I will need a
    better bow, telescopic sights, balances and carbon fibre arrows." He
    may have somewhat simplified his argument, but I think there is some
    truth in it.

    --
    Mikefule - The first cuckoo of unicycling

    Sumer is icomen in, loud sing Mikefule!
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Mikefule's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/879
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/42182

  7. I didn't mean to compare a 24" x 3" to a 26" x 3"

    I was really wanting to compare 24" x 3" to 26" x X".
    My theory is that a 26" x 2.6" will be lighter, just as manuervable,
    just as durable, a tiny bit faster, AND offer the benenfits I started
    the thread with.

    Moreover, I saw a distinct possibility to put a REAL road tire on the
    26" wheel (not the Hookworm). And, as you might know, changing the tire
    and maintaining a 26" will be easier (if you use bike shops from time to
    time like I do).

    Right now, I have a 24" x 2.3" and a 24" x 2.125 tube on my uni BECAUSE
    there is no where in town to get a replacement 24" x 3.0 tube (or
    anything close to it).

    I'll probably stick with the 24", but not before I take more time to
    consider a 26 x @2.6. JerryGruss has one, and it rides about the same as
    my current setup.

    My guess is that a 26" rim could turn out to be MORE versatile than the
    24".

    --
    ChangingLINKS.com - member

    Wishing you Happiness, Joy and Laughter,
    Drew Brown
    'Changing LINKS' (http://www.ChangingLINKS.com)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ChangingLINKS.com's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/5468
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/42182

  8. ChangingLINKS.com said:

    *Right now, I have a 24" x 2.3" and a 24" x 2.125 tube on my uni
    BECAUSE there is no where in town to get a replacement 24" x 3.0 tube
    (or anything close to it).*

    I have a 24x3 in my DX (it barely fit). I got it at university cyclery,
    but it was around $15 which is a ripoff. I'm using it because it's very
    very resistant to pinch flats.

    Freewheeling had some 2.4-2.8 (ish) ones a while back, but I bought them
    out of those. They should have more in a week or so.

    --
    vanman2004 - ...
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    vanman2004's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/9184
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/42182

  9. I'm glad you asked about the 24 vs 26, because I have been asking the
    same question.

    As for the 24x3 tube -- I just put a 24 x 3 Gazz on my DX and am using
    the original 24 x 2.125 tube which is working fine for now.

    Just in case, I ordered a 24 x 3 tube from the Bicycle Exchange in
    Carrollton, Texas (972-245-5510) -- north side of Dallas, if your
    interested. They have several in their book that they can get and their
    prices are reasonable.

    --
    donna
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    donna's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/10322
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/42182

  10. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    -"Moreover, I saw a distinct possibility to put a REAL road tire on the
    26" wheel ..."-
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If your plans are to ride on the streets go for a 29er.

    --
    roadkill - Crash Test Dummy

    "Anger is like acid that eventually destroys its own container"
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    roadkill's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/9784
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/42182

  11. 24" is good for everything

    --
    unibrow - Unicyclist by day....

    An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind....
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    unibrow's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/2496
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/42182

  12. ChangingLINKS.com said:

    *What are the benefits of a 24" wheel over a 26"? I am considering
    switching to 26". Aside from having a 3" tire (at lighter weight) is
    there an advantage to the 24"?*

    The 26" will make your legs hurt more after a muni ride. That's not an
    issue if your legs are not prone to pain, but if they tend to hurt after
    a ride--let's say to the point that you publically complain about
    it--then you'd definitely want to stick with the 24". That tactic,
    along with lots of rest and cutting back on your exercise routine, will
    be the best way to have those legs 🙂-ing again.

    --
    tomblackwood - Registered Nurtz

    Tailgate at your own risk.....

    "By George! The man's a genius!"
    Murde Mental

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    tomblackwood's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/3762
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/42182

  13. tomblackwood said:

    *The 26" will make your legs hurt more after a muni ride. That's not
    an issue if your legs are not prone to pain, but if they tend to hurt
    after a ride--let's say to the point that you publically complain
    about it--then you'd definitely want to stick with the 24". That
    tactic, along with lots of rest and cutting back on your exercise
    routine, will be the best way to have those legs 🙂-ing again. *

    I think you are right.
    I'm planning to stick with the 24" now.
    My enthusiasm declined when I figured out that a standard mountain bike
    as 32 HOLES. Profile has 36. The LBS said "Don't do it."

    I guess I'll just buy extra spare parts for the 24"

    --
    ChangingLINKS.com - member

    Wishing you Happiness, Joy and Laughter,
    Drew Brown
    'Changing LINKS' (http://www.ChangingLINKS.com)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ChangingLINKS.com's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/5468
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/42182

  14. there are loads of mountain bike rims in 36 hole, most freeride /
    downhill rims are available in 36 hole. If you were considering a
    26x2.6" tyre, you'd want one of those rims anyway.

    I ride a 26"x2.6" gazz tyre. It rides about the same as a 24"x3", a bit
    more rolly, but not quite so bouncy. I don't think you'd notice a
    massive difference unless you do a lot of trials, pedal grabs etc. I
    notice much more difference between crank lengths on a 24". I'm faster
    than quite a few of the people I ride with, but I think that's mainly
    due to riding several miles every day.

    You do have the choice of running an XC tyre if you want. I know a few
    people who ride with 2.0 or 2.1 tyres, this makes it noticeably
    different. If you run a road tyre and short cranks, it's not that
    different from a 29er.

    Personally I think a few very very good riders actually ride hard enough
    for there to be any difference and for the extra durability of the wheel
    to matter, pretty much everyone else just rides 24" not 26" because it's
    what unicycle.com mostly sells and because it's what Kris rides. Like
    Mike says, don't obsess about equipment, just ride more.

    Joe

    --
    joemarshall - dumb blonde

    my pics http://gallery.unicyclist.com/album483
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    joemarshall's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/1545
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/42182

  15. I didn't want to come off as "obsessed about equipment" like a
    weight-weiny or anything. I just saw quite a few benefits from a 26"
    that I could really use NOW. The 24" has some frustrating downsides
    (that have nothing to do with riding).

    I could see myself with a
    26" x 2.3
    26" x 2.8-3.0
    26" x road racing tire + short cranks

    and being happier than running my 24"

    However, I can also see myself happy simply sticking with my 24" and
    becoming my own bike shop.

    --
    ChangingLINKS.com - member

    Wishing you Happiness, Joy and Laughter,
    Drew Brown
    'Changing LINKS' (http://www.ChangingLINKS.com)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ChangingLINKS.com's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/5468
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/42182

  16. I like the 3" tire size because a lot of the trails that I ride have
    roots and rocks that I like to plow over. The 3" tire makes a big
    difference. You can aim straight for the roots and just go right over
    them. A 2.6" Gazz doesn't quite cut it. A 3" tire is also better on
    stunts and things.

    Back when I was riding the Pashley MUni with a 26x2.1 XC tire I would
    have to zig-zag my way around the roots and avoid the bigger rocks
    because the tire can't just plow into and over things like a 3" tire
    can. The same trail is very different on a 2.1" XC tire compared to a
    3" DH tire. I like the experience with the 3" tire better, much better.
    It's completely different even on the exact same trail.

    A 2.6 Gazz Jr lets you plow into things harder than you can with a 2.1"
    XC tire. But a 3" tire lets you plow into things harder than you can
    with a 2.6 Gazz Jr. It's evolution.

    I keep thinking about getting a 29er for faster and lighter XC riding.
    But there are very few trails that I ride where the 29er would be a
    better choice than my 24x3. I've ridden all of the trails I ride on my
    old 26x2.1 Pashley so I know they can be done on a 29er, although I'd
    have to skip some of the stunts and jumps and drops. But the experience
    on the 29er wouldn't be as fun. So if I got a 29er (like the new KH
    29er) I'm trying to figure out when I'd actually ride it. There's only
    a few trails I can think of where I'd ride it and they're the smooth
    buff style XC trails. There's a few epic class XC trails where the
    29er would work but those are the kinds of rides I do once per season at
    most.

    There are trails where the 29er would do well and if you ride those
    sorts of trails then the 29er would be a good choice. It would also
    allow you to mix in some road riding or dirt logging road riding along
    with the singletrack riding. It all depends on where you ride and what
    you like.

    --
    john_childs - Guinness Mojo

    john_childs (att) hotmail (dott) com
    Gallery: '' (http://gallery.unicyclist.com/john_childs)
    ' Unicycling Bookmark List' (http://backcountry.unicyclist.com/) ::
    'World Clock' (http://tinyurl.com/a99y3) >>>'Click Me'
    (http://tinyurl.com/7lvbu)<<<
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    john_childs's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/449
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/42182

  17. I'm running a 26x3" Gazz on a 26" Large Marge Rim, and I've found it to
    be a fabulous machine for speed trails, distace and Muni. I've put 170mm
    cranks on as standard but switch to 140mm for distance, and it performs
    admirably in either situation. Yes it is heavier than a 24, but it makes
    up for this by being higher off the ground (less pedal strikes causing
    painful UPDs), easier to roll over rocks and roots, more controllable on
    steep downhills and more rolling momentum to get up short, steep
    ascents. I've got a 24" Onza as well, but thats running a 2.6" Kenda
    Kinetics (I think) tyre, so the difference between them is marked enough
    to warrant me having both.

    Loose.

    --
    Loosemoose - HA! Sod You Gilby, I HAVE DAMMIT!

    Dave: "I had a particularly bad UPD & found I'd lost a shoe"
    Officially a  & ~ expert.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Loosemoose's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/6326
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/42182

  18. I'm riding a 26" nimbus muni with 140mm cranks and the standard 3" tyre
    and it works great for me.

    I don't do much jumping around just riding round some of the local
    trails and it's great. I haven't done much on a 24" so I don't know how
    that would compare but I think if you are going to be doing any serious
    hills then you may well be better with the 24. It really does depend on
    the sort of riding you want to do but I'm going to stick with my 26.

    --
    plumsie - Must try harder
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    plumsie's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/9800
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/42182

  19. You might get more information by telling us a little more about what
    you trying to do. It sounds like you have problems with your 24x3
    Muni and are looking for alternatives. What you haven't said is what
    sort of riding you plan to do, the number of unicycles you think you
    may need, or how big you budget is.

    What I can offer is an opinion of my own unicycles. I have a 26x2.5
    Hookworm equipped unicycle and a KH 24. Despite its claim to be a
    downhill tire, the hookworm is far less friendly when the terrain gets
    evel a little bit rough. On even terrain, the hookworm is smooth as
    silk. The 24x3 Duro can be run with far less pressure and can easily
    roll over obstacles that require stomping hard on the pedals on the
    26" tire. On the other hand, riding a knobby 24x3 on the road is a
    chore compared to the round, semi-slick hookworm. Since I don't like
    riding the Hoookworm offroad, I put shortish (125mm) cranks on the
    uni and am very happy with the result.

    Does this help you? I don't honestly know. I think the point I am
    trying to make is that these unicycles are so different, I wouldn't
    consider replacing one with the other.

    Ken

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.