Re: Amyloids, not

<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"> The "Amyloids series" is from one who has invented an

Quoted message said:

unsupported scheme
not based in science, self diagnosed based on it and self
medicates with

Read the links...here is just one. the other posts in the
my amyloid series list many others and the original search
results.
57,000 links to university level research."

I have been following your "series" for some years now, and
it still has
no basis in science.

C O R R E C T. until two weeks ago when study results were
shown to have reversed AD (in rats and now humans) and
diabetes 2 (in rats)

My completely anecdotal experience aligns however...the
results have been dramatic... I am age 64 and racing
motorccles on the dirt ovals as I was when I as 25. No way
could I have even dreamed of doing that at 55. but yes
***anectdotal in my case...one guy.

The research links Ive been posting however are from major
universities and those are anything but anecdotal.

you dont read these? You think others in this thread dont
read the links?

Gots yosep a clooo mon.

You point to valid research and then self

Quoted message said:

diagnos in yourself, in a manner not related to the
research, all the
while inventing a scheme about how it works in your body
that is pure
imagination.

Whats going on with me COULD be pure imagination... its just
my report is all. the university studies I link to however
are not anyones imagination. You cant see that?

All the criteria you have for diagnosis you ihnvented and

Quoted message said:

all the measures you also invented to show change of
something that only
exists in your mind.

Try flat tracking at age 64 against the hot shot kiddies age
20+ at 130 mph sideways and then tell me about it.

Real measures of the substance requires tests and

Quoted message said:

biological examination at the tissue level, not the
subjective
gobblygook you list.

Well... mostly correct. What I list about myself IS
subjective as you say in many aspects and more than prone to
various errors or wishfull thinking.

The dramatic increase in stamina though, is hardly subjective.

We AND YOU have no real way to know if you have or

Quoted message said:

evr had one gram of the substance in your body.

Well you could say the same for blood... except that its so
commonly accepted that everyone has blood.
Now, if you read the studies on amyloids, the symptoms of
amyloid accumulations etc are becoming widely known and it is
see as very common.

My symptoms align perfectly with amyloidosis...and have abated
as Ive done what Ive done, which by various *assumptions* seem
to have gotten rid of huge amounts of amyloid... it has
indentifiable physical characteristics and color (various
species)

You are demonstrating not a clean skepticism but a
pathological refusal to observe. not my problem.

Your 'TREATMENT"

Quoted message said:

CONSISTS OF APPLYING LOTIAN TYPE COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS TO YOUR
SKIN,
NOTHING THAT THE REAL RESEARCH SUPPORTS EVEN IN THE LEAST.

Learn how to spell lotion and your argument would be more
impressive. Your description is also misleading. the major
aspect of my protocol was Effudix 5% florourcil..a topical
chemotherapy agent (also applied by IV means)... not exactly
just a 'commercial' lotion. Your spin and attampts at a
trash job discredit you... as you then ignore the University
research links I provide.

Then insinuate I am peddling something...which I have not, and
do not even recommend, in fact warn against...advising people
to wait until the vaccine etc arrives.

duhhhh. You waste a lot of time.

Phil Scott

<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"> The "Amyloids series" is from one who has invented an

Quoted message said:

unsupported scheme
not based in science, self diagnosed based on it and self
medicates with

Read the links...here is just one. the other posts in the
my amyloid series list many others and the original search
results.
57,000 links to university level research."

I have been following your "series" for some years now, and
it still has
no basis in science.

C O R R E C T. until two weeks ago when study results were
shown to have reversed AD (in rats and now humans) and
diabetes 2 (in rats)

My completely anecdotal experience aligns however...the
results have been dramatic... I am age 64 and racing
motorccles on the dirt ovals as I was when I as 25. No way
could I have even dreamed of doing that at 55. but yes
***anectdotal in my case...one guy.

The research links Ive been posting however are from major
universities and those are anything but anecdotal.

you dont read these? You think others in this thread dont
read the links?

Gots yosep a clooo mon.

You point to valid research and then self

Quoted message said:

diagnos in yourself, in a manner not related to the
research, all the
while inventing a scheme about how it works in your body
that is pure
imagination.

Whats going on with me COULD be pure imagination... its just
my report is all. the university studies I link to however
are not anyones imagination. You cant see that?

All the criteria you have for diagnosis you ihnvented and

Quoted message said:

all the measures you also invented to show change of
something that only
exists in your mind.

Try flat tracking at age 64 against the hot shot kiddies age
20+ at 130 mph sideways and then tell me about it.

Real measures of the substance requires tests and

Quoted message said:

biological examination at the tissue level, not the
subjective
gobblygook you list.

Well... mostly correct. What I list about myself IS
subjective as you say in many aspects and more than prone to
various errors or wishfull thinking.

The dramatic increase in stamina though, is hardly subjective.

We AND YOU have no real way to know if you have or

Quoted message said:

evr had one gram of the substance in your body.

Well you could say the same for blood... except that its so
commonly accepted that everyone has blood.
Now, if you read the studies on amyloids, the symptoms of
amyloid accumulations etc are becoming widely known and it is
see as very common.

My symptoms align perfectly with amyloidosis...and have abated
as Ive done what Ive done, which by various *assumptions* seem
to have gotten rid of huge amounts of amyloid... it has
indentifiable physical characteristics and color (various
species)

You are demonstrating not a clean skepticism but a
pathological refusal to observe. not my problem.

Your 'TREATMENT"

Quoted message said:

CONSISTS OF APPLYING LOTIAN TYPE COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS TO YOUR
SKIN,
NOTHING THAT THE REAL RESEARCH SUPPORTS EVEN IN THE LEAST.

Learn how to spell lotion and your argument would be more
impressive. Your description is also misleading. the major
aspect of my protocol was Effudix 5% florourcil..a topical
chemotherapy agent (also applied by IV means)... not exactly
just a 'commercial' lotion. Your spin and attampts at a
trash job discredit you... as you then ignore the University
research links I provide.

Then insinuate I am peddling something...which I have not, and
do not even recommend, in fact warn against...advising people
to wait until the vaccine etc arrives.

duhhhh. You waste a lot of time.

Phil Scott

<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"> The "Amyloids series" is from one who has invented an

Quoted message said:

unsupported scheme
not based in science, self diagnosed based on it and self
medicates with

Read the links...here is just one. the other posts in the
my amyloid series list many others and the original search
results.
57,000 links to university level research."

I have been following your "series" for some years now, and
it still has
no basis in science.

C O R R E C T. until two weeks ago when study results were
shown to have reversed AD (in rats and now humans) and
diabetes 2 (in rats)

My completely anecdotal experience aligns however...the
results have been dramatic... I am age 64 and racing
motorccles on the dirt ovals as I was when I as 25. No way
could I have even dreamed of doing that at 55. but yes
***anectdotal in my case...one guy.

The research links Ive been posting however are from major
universities and those are anything but anecdotal.

you dont read these? You think others in this thread dont
read the links?

Gots yosep a clooo mon.

You point to valid research and then self

Quoted message said:

diagnos in yourself, in a manner not related to the
research, all the
while inventing a scheme about how it works in your body
that is pure
imagination.

Whats going on with me COULD be pure imagination... its just
my report is all. the university studies I link to however
are not anyones imagination. You cant see that?

All the criteria you have for diagnosis you ihnvented and

Quoted message said:

all the measures you also invented to show change of
something that only
exists in your mind.

Try flat tracking at age 64 against the hot shot kiddies age
20+ at 130 mph sideways and then tell me about it.

Real measures of the substance requires tests and

Quoted message said:

biological examination at the tissue level, not the
subjective
gobblygook you list.

Well... mostly correct. What I list about myself IS
subjective as you say in many aspects and more than prone to
various errors or wishfull thinking.

The dramatic increase in stamina though, is hardly subjective.

We AND YOU have no real way to know if you have or

Quoted message said:

evr had one gram of the substance in your body.

Well you could say the same for blood... except that its so
commonly accepted that everyone has blood.
Now, if you read the studies on amyloids, the symptoms of
amyloid accumulations etc are becoming widely known and it is
see as very common.

My symptoms align perfectly with amyloidosis...and have abated
as Ive done what Ive done, which by various *assumptions* seem
to have gotten rid of huge amounts of amyloid... it has
indentifiable physical characteristics and color (various
species)

You are demonstrating not a clean skepticism but a
pathological refusal to observe. not my problem.

Your 'TREATMENT"

Quoted message said:

CONSISTS OF APPLYING LOTIAN TYPE COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS TO YOUR
SKIN,
NOTHING THAT THE REAL RESEARCH SUPPORTS EVEN IN THE LEAST.

Learn how to spell lotion and your argument would be more
impressive. Your description is also misleading. the major
aspect of my protocol was Effudix 5% florourcil..a topical
chemotherapy agent (also applied by IV means)... not exactly
just a 'commercial' lotion. Your spin and attampts at a
trash job discredit you... as you then ignore the University
research links I provide.

Then insinuate I am peddling something...which I have not, and
do not even recommend, in fact warn against...advising people
to wait until the vaccine etc arrives.

duhhhh. You waste a lot of time.

Phil Scott

<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"> The "Amyloids series" is from one who has invented an

Quoted message said:

unsupported scheme
not based in science, self diagnosed based on it and self
medicates with

Read the links...here is just one. the other posts in the
my amyloid series list many others and the original search
results.
57,000 links to university level research."

I have been following your "series" for some years now, and
it still has
no basis in science.

C O R R E C T. until two weeks ago when study results were
shown to have reversed AD (in rats and now humans) and
diabetes 2 (in rats)

My completely anecdotal experience aligns however...the
results have been dramatic... I am age 64 and racing
motorccles on the dirt ovals as I was when I as 25. No way
could I have even dreamed of doing that at 55. but yes
***anectdotal in my case...one guy.

The research links Ive been posting however are from major
universities and those are anything but anecdotal.

you dont read these? You think others in this thread dont
read the links?

Gots yosep a clooo mon.

You point to valid research and then self

Quoted message said:

diagnos in yourself, in a manner not related to the
research, all the
while inventing a scheme about how it works in your body
that is pure
imagination.

Whats going on with me COULD be pure imagination... its just
my report is all. the university studies I link to however
are not anyones imagination. You cant see that?

All the criteria you have for diagnosis you ihnvented and

Quoted message said:

all the measures you also invented to show change of
something that only
exists in your mind.

Try flat tracking at age 64 against the hot shot kiddies age
20+ at 130 mph sideways and then tell me about it.

Real measures of the substance requires tests and

Quoted message said:

biological examination at the tissue level, not the
subjective
gobblygook you list.

Well... mostly correct. What I list about myself IS
subjective as you say in many aspects and more than prone to
various errors or wishfull thinking.

The dramatic increase in stamina though, is hardly subjective.

We AND YOU have no real way to know if you have or

Quoted message said:

evr had one gram of the substance in your body.

Well you could say the same for blood... except that its so
commonly accepted that everyone has blood.
Now, if you read the studies on amyloids, the symptoms of
amyloid accumulations etc are becoming widely known and it is
see as very common.

My symptoms align perfectly with amyloidosis...and have abated
as Ive done what Ive done, which by various *assumptions* seem
to have gotten rid of huge amounts of amyloid... it has
indentifiable physical characteristics and color (various
species)

You are demonstrating not a clean skepticism but a
pathological refusal to observe. not my problem.

Your 'TREATMENT"

Quoted message said:

CONSISTS OF APPLYING LOTIAN TYPE COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS TO YOUR
SKIN,
NOTHING THAT THE REAL RESEARCH SUPPORTS EVEN IN THE LEAST.

Learn how to spell lotion and your argument would be more
impressive. Your description is also misleading. the major
aspect of my protocol was Effudix 5% florourcil..a topical
chemotherapy agent (also applied by IV means)... not exactly
just a 'commercial' lotion. Your spin and attampts at a
trash job discredit you... as you then ignore the University
research links I provide.

Then insinuate I am peddling something...which I have not, and
do not even recommend, in fact warn against...advising people
to wait until the vaccine etc arrives.

duhhhh. You waste a lot of time.

Phil Scott

<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"> The "Amyloids series" is from one who has invented an

Quoted message said:

unsupported scheme
not based in science, self diagnosed based on it and self
medicates with

Read the links...here is just one. the other posts in the
my amyloid series list many others and the original search
results.
57,000 links to university level research."

I have been following your "series" for some years now, and
it still has
no basis in science.

C O R R E C T. until two weeks ago when study results were
shown to have reversed AD (in rats and now humans) and
diabetes 2 (in rats)

My completely anecdotal experience aligns however...the
results have been dramatic... I am age 64 and racing
motorccles on the dirt ovals as I was when I as 25. No way
could I have even dreamed of doing that at 55. but yes
***anectdotal in my case...one guy.

The research links Ive been posting however are from major
universities and those are anything but anecdotal.

you dont read these? You think others in this thread dont
read the links?

Gots yosep a clooo mon.

You point to valid research and then self

Quoted message said:

diagnos in yourself, in a manner not related to the
research, all the
while inventing a scheme about how it works in your body
that is pure
imagination.

Whats going on with me COULD be pure imagination... its just
my report is all. the university studies I link to however
are not anyones imagination. You cant see that?

All the criteria you have for diagnosis you ihnvented and

Quoted message said:

all the measures you also invented to show change of
something that only
exists in your mind.

Try flat tracking at age 64 against the hot shot kiddies age
20+ at 130 mph sideways and then tell me about it.

Real measures of the substance requires tests and

Quoted message said:

biological examination at the tissue level, not the
subjective
gobblygook you list.

Well... mostly correct. What I list about myself IS
subjective as you say in many aspects and more than prone to
various errors or wishfull thinking.

The dramatic increase in stamina though, is hardly subjective.

We AND YOU have no real way to know if you have or

Quoted message said:

evr had one gram of the substance in your body.

Well you could say the same for blood... except that its so
commonly accepted that everyone has blood.
Now, if you read the studies on amyloids, the symptoms of
amyloid accumulations etc are becoming widely known and it is
see as very common.

My symptoms align perfectly with amyloidosis...and have abated
as Ive done what Ive done, which by various *assumptions* seem
to have gotten rid of huge amounts of amyloid... it has
indentifiable physical characteristics and color (various
species)

You are demonstrating not a clean skepticism but a
pathological refusal to observe. not my problem.

Your 'TREATMENT"

Quoted message said:

CONSISTS OF APPLYING LOTIAN TYPE COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS TO YOUR
SKIN,
NOTHING THAT THE REAL RESEARCH SUPPORTS EVEN IN THE LEAST.

Learn how to spell lotion and your argument would be more
impressive. Your description is also misleading. the major
aspect of my protocol was Effudix 5% florourcil..a topical
chemotherapy agent (also applied by IV means)... not exactly
just a 'commercial' lotion. Your spin and attampts at a
trash job discredit you... as you then ignore the University
research links I provide.

Then insinuate I am peddling something...which I have not, and
do not even recommend, in fact warn against...advising people
to wait until the vaccine etc arrives.

duhhhh. You waste a lot of time.

Phil Scott

<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"> The "Amyloids series" is from one who has invented an

Quoted message said:

unsupported scheme
not based in science, self diagnosed based on it and self
medicates with

Read the links...here is just one. the other posts in the
my amyloid series list many others and the original search
results.
57,000 links to university level research."

I have been following your "series" for some years now, and
it still has
no basis in science.

C O R R E C T. until two weeks ago when study results were
shown to have reversed AD (in rats and now humans) and
diabetes 2 (in rats)

My completely anecdotal experience aligns however...the
results have been dramatic... I am age 64 and racing
motorccles on the dirt ovals as I was when I as 25. No way
could I have even dreamed of doing that at 55. but yes
***anectdotal in my case...one guy.

The research links Ive been posting however are from major
universities and those are anything but anecdotal.

you dont read these? You think others in this thread dont
read the links?

Gots yosep a clooo mon.

You point to valid research and then self

Quoted message said:

diagnos in yourself, in a manner not related to the
research, all the
while inventing a scheme about how it works in your body
that is pure
imagination.

Whats going on with me COULD be pure imagination... its just
my report is all. the university studies I link to however
are not anyones imagination. You cant see that?

All the criteria you have for diagnosis you ihnvented and

Quoted message said:

all the measures you also invented to show change of
something that only
exists in your mind.

Try flat tracking at age 64 against the hot shot kiddies age
20+ at 130 mph sideways and then tell me about it.

Real measures of the substance requires tests and

Quoted message said:

biological examination at the tissue level, not the
subjective
gobblygook you list.

Well... mostly correct. What I list about myself IS
subjective as you say in many aspects and more than prone to
various errors or wishfull thinking.

The dramatic increase in stamina though, is hardly subjective.

We AND YOU have no real way to know if you have or

Quoted message said:

evr had one gram of the substance in your body.

Well you could say the same for blood... except that its so
commonly accepted that everyone has blood.
Now, if you read the studies on amyloids, the symptoms of
amyloid accumulations etc are becoming widely known and it is
see as very common.

My symptoms align perfectly with amyloidosis...and have abated
as Ive done what Ive done, which by various *assumptions* seem
to have gotten rid of huge amounts of amyloid... it has
indentifiable physical characteristics and color (various
species)

You are demonstrating not a clean skepticism but a
pathological refusal to observe. not my problem.

Your 'TREATMENT"

Quoted message said:

CONSISTS OF APPLYING LOTIAN TYPE COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS TO YOUR
SKIN,
NOTHING THAT THE REAL RESEARCH SUPPORTS EVEN IN THE LEAST.

Learn how to spell lotion and your argument would be more
impressive. Your description is also misleading. the major
aspect of my protocol was Effudix 5% florourcil..a topical
chemotherapy agent (also applied by IV means)... not exactly
just a 'commercial' lotion. Your spin and attampts at a
trash job discredit you... as you then ignore the University
research links I provide.

Then insinuate I am peddling something...which I have not, and
do not even recommend, in fact warn against...advising people
to wait until the vaccine etc arrives.

duhhhh. You waste a lot of time.

Phil Scott

To summarize, you say the research is real and your experience is
subjective but you still want to think there is some reality in the vast
logical jump it involvss. There is the research on one hand and on the
other your invented self diagnosis based on self identified and self
invented symptoms with your self administered dubious treatment for what
was not based on any reality but a subjective guess some product applied
to your skin might have some effect. Now with that setup, wonders of
wonders you have a dirt bike and that is proof enough to validate the
whole invented series of logical dance steps. This is an almoste exact
replay of our exchanges some time ago. To save us some time this go
round, you ended the last one by saying it was all unsupported but why
sweat the details of something you wanted to be a reality and it only
applied to you anyway. Why should I bother, just to avoid having some
unsuspecting person get caught up in your shadow waltz, this time round

To summarize, you say the research is real and your experience is
subjective but you still want to think there is some reality in the vast
logical jump it involvss. There is the research on one hand and on the
other your invented self diagnosis based on self identified and self
invented symptoms with your self administered dubious treatment for what
was not based on any reality but a subjective guess some product applied
to your skin might have some effect. Now with that setup, wonders of
wonders you have a dirt bike and that is proof enough to validate the
whole invented series of logical dance steps. This is an almoste exact
replay of our exchanges some time ago. To save us some time this go
round, you ended the last one by saying it was all unsupported but why
sweat the details of something you wanted to be a reality and it only
applied to you anyway. Why should I bother, just to avoid having some
unsuspecting person get caught up in your shadow waltz, this time round

To summarize, you say the research is real and your experience is
subjective but you still want to think there is some reality in the vast
logical jump it involvss. There is the research on one hand and on the
other your invented self diagnosis based on self identified and self
invented symptoms with your self administered dubious treatment for what
was not based on any reality but a subjective guess some product applied
to your skin might have some effect. Now with that setup, wonders of
wonders you have a dirt bike and that is proof enough to validate the
whole invented series of logical dance steps. This is an almoste exact
replay of our exchanges some time ago. To save us some time this go
round, you ended the last one by saying it was all unsupported but why
sweat the details of something you wanted to be a reality and it only
applied to you anyway. Why should I bother, just to avoid having some
unsuspecting person get caught up in your shadow waltz, this time round

To summarize, you say the research is real and your experience is
subjective but you still want to think there is some reality in the vast
logical jump it involvss. There is the research on one hand and on the
other your invented self diagnosis based on self identified and self
invented symptoms with your self administered dubious treatment for what
was not based on any reality but a subjective guess some product applied
to your skin might have some effect. Now with that setup, wonders of
wonders you have a dirt bike and that is proof enough to validate the
whole invented series of logical dance steps. This is an almoste exact
replay of our exchanges some time ago. To save us some time this go
round, you ended the last one by saying it was all unsupported but why
sweat the details of something you wanted to be a reality and it only
applied to you anyway. Why should I bother, just to avoid having some
unsuspecting person get caught up in your shadow waltz, this time round

To summarize, you say the research is real and your experience is
subjective but you still want to think there is some reality in the vast
logical jump it involvss. There is the research on one hand and on the
other your invented self diagnosis based on self identified and self
invented symptoms with your self administered dubious treatment for what
was not based on any reality but a subjective guess some product applied
to your skin might have some effect. Now with that setup, wonders of
wonders you have a dirt bike and that is proof enough to validate the
whole invented series of logical dance steps. This is an almoste exact
replay of our exchanges some time ago. To save us some time this go
round, you ended the last one by saying it was all unsupported but why
sweat the details of something you wanted to be a reality and it only
applied to you anyway. Why should I bother, just to avoid having some
unsuspecting person get caught up in your shadow waltz, this time round

To summarize, you say the research is real and your experience is
subjective but you still want to think there is some reality in the vast
logical jump it involvss. There is the research on one hand and on the
other your invented self diagnosis based on self identified and self
invented symptoms with your self administered dubious treatment for what
was not based on any reality but a subjective guess some product applied
to your skin might have some effect. Now with that setup, wonders of
wonders you have a dirt bike and that is proof enough to validate the
whole invented series of logical dance steps. This is an almoste exact
replay of our exchanges some time ago. To save us some time this go
round, you ended the last one by saying it was all unsupported but why
sweat the details of something you wanted to be a reality and it only
applied to you anyway. Why should I bother, just to avoid having some
unsuspecting person get caught up in your shadow waltz, this time round

Quoted message said:

<[email hidden]> wrote:
I have been following your "series" for some years now, and
it still has no basis in science.

Phil Scott said:

C O R R E C T. until two weeks ago when study results were
shown to have reversed AD (in rats and now humans) and
diabetes 2 (in rats)

Did the study to counter amyloid disease reply on a vaccine?

Using diet modification to solve amyloid disease would be a
problem since most people would be un-willing to change their diet.

Using nutrients to solve amyloid disease would be a problem
since CODEX wishes to ban nutritional supplements.

Quoted message said:

<[email hidden]> wrote:
I have been following your "series" for some years now, and
it still has no basis in science.

Phil Scott said:

C O R R E C T. until two weeks ago when study results were
shown to have reversed AD (in rats and now humans) and
diabetes 2 (in rats)

Did the study to counter amyloid disease reply on a vaccine?

Using diet modification to solve amyloid disease would be a
problem since most people would be un-willing to change their diet.

Using nutrients to solve amyloid disease would be a problem
since CODEX wishes to ban nutritional supplements.

Quoted message said:

<[email hidden]> wrote:
I have been following your "series" for some years now, and
it still has no basis in science.

Phil Scott said:

C O R R E C T. until two weeks ago when study results were
shown to have reversed AD (in rats and now humans) and
diabetes 2 (in rats)

Did the study to counter amyloid disease reply on a vaccine?

Using diet modification to solve amyloid disease would be a
problem since most people would be un-willing to change their diet.

Using nutrients to solve amyloid disease would be a problem
since CODEX wishes to ban nutritional supplements.

Quoted message said:

<[email hidden]> wrote:
I have been following your "series" for some years now, and
it still has no basis in science.

Phil Scott said:

C O R R E C T. until two weeks ago when study results were
shown to have reversed AD (in rats and now humans) and
diabetes 2 (in rats)

Did the study to counter amyloid disease reply on a vaccine?

Using diet modification to solve amyloid disease would be a
problem since most people would be un-willing to change their diet.

Using nutrients to solve amyloid disease would be a problem
since CODEX wishes to ban nutritional supplements.

Quoted message said:

<[email hidden]> wrote:
I have been following your "series" for some years now, and
it still has no basis in science.

Phil Scott said:

C O R R E C T. until two weeks ago when study results were
shown to have reversed AD (in rats and now humans) and
diabetes 2 (in rats)

Did the study to counter amyloid disease reply on a vaccine?

Using diet modification to solve amyloid disease would be a
problem since most people would be un-willing to change their diet.

Using nutrients to solve amyloid disease would be a problem
since CODEX wishes to ban nutritional supplements.

Quoted message said:

<[email hidden]> wrote:
I have been following your "series" for some years now, and
it still has no basis in science.

Phil Scott said:

C O R R E C T. until two weeks ago when study results were
shown to have reversed AD (in rats and now humans) and
diabetes 2 (in rats)

Did the study to counter amyloid disease reply on a vaccine?

Using diet modification to solve amyloid disease would be a
problem since most people would be un-willing to change their diet.

Using nutrients to solve amyloid disease would be a problem
since CODEX wishes to ban nutritional supplements.

Quoted message said:

<[email hidden]> wrote:
I have been following your "series" for some years now, and
it still has no basis in science.

Phil Scott said:

C O R R E C T. until two weeks ago when study results were
shown to have reversed AD (in rats and now humans) and
diabetes 2 (in rats)

Did the study to counter amyloid disease reply on a vaccine?

Using diet modification to solve amyloid disease would be a
problem since most people would be un-willing to change their diet.

Using nutrients to solve amyloid disease would be a problem
since CODEX wishes to ban nutritional supplements.