Road Cycling · Public discussion

Will Armstrong retire?

Started by Manco · · Last activity · 36 posts · 1,220 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
16 July 2005
Last activity
19 July 2005
Original author
Manco
Posts
36
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,220
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 36
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. after he wins his 7th straight TDF?

  2. On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 19:47:18 GMT, "Manco" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    after he wins his 7th straight TDF?

    Yes, he already said he would.

    The question is whether or not he can STAY retired.

    If he finishes out strong there is no one who wouldn't put him as the
    odds on favorite in next years TdF.

    D

  3. David Ferguson said:

    odds on favorite in next years TdF.

    So you're giving him less than evens to win?

    --
    Firefox Browser - Rediscover the web - http://getffox.com/
    Thunderbird E-mail and Newsgroups - http://gettbird.com/

  4. Certainly, he has no reason to continue racing except EGO. He will retire
    and stay in retirement.

    Ken

    "Manco" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:avdCe.3730$Zu1.2189@trnddc04...

    Quoted message said:

    after he wins his 7th straight TDF?

  5. Ewoud Dronkert said:
    David Ferguson said:

    odds on favorite in next years TdF.

    So you're giving him less than evens to win?

    No, I don't think he would be less than evens to win so I shouldn't
    put it that way.

    Good point.

    It just sounds more fun to say "odds on favorite".

    D

  6. "IMKen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Certainly, he has no reason to continue racing except EGO. He will retire and stay in retirement.

    Ken

    From the tour. There are other palmares out there.

  7. I believe he will. He'll still ride, no doubt, but he has kids, a new woman
    and the LAF, other ventures to keep him busy.

    Touring with Sheryl will probably take some time (they made a deal) and that
    would be a great way for him to do some stumping for LAF and some speaking
    tours--he'll surely be in demand for appearances.

    He'll probably still hit some local events for fun. Maybe he'll have some
    fun dropping in on some local club rides around the country...I don't think
    he'll have any trouble hauling his wheels where ever he goes and getting out
    to ride.

  8. "David Ferguson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 19:47:18 GMT, "Manco" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    after he wins his 7th straight TDF?

    Yes, he already said he would.

    The question is whether or not he can STAY retired.

    If he finishes out strong there is no one who wouldn't put him as the
    odds on favorite in next years TdF.

    D

    It is possible that Discovery will cough up a significant cash inducement as
    they realize his marketing value compared to that of anyone else.

    Laz

  9. "Laz" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de news:
    [email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "David Ferguson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 19:47:18 GMT, "Manco" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    after he wins his 7th straight TDF?

    Yes, he already said he would.

    The question is whether or not he can STAY retired.

    If he finishes out strong there is no one who wouldn't put him as the
    odds on favorite in next years TdF.

    D

    It is possible that Discovery will cough up a significant cash inducement
    as
    they realize his marketing value compared to that of anyone else.

    Laz

    Nah, Discovery doesn't have that kind of money. The amount they could/would
    pay is small compared to what he makes as a celeb sports figure.

    Plus, they've got him hosting a show in the not so distant future which is
    another way to cash in on his celebrity.

  10. On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 16:53:36 -0400, "Laz" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    It is possible that Discovery will cough up a significant cash inducement as
    they realize his marketing value compared to that of anyone else.

    They dude made 30 million or so last year, and he'll keep making
    millions without racing another day.

  11. A sports physician friend of mine said that 5 to 7 years is the prescribed
    maximum use of steroids for athletes because of the long-term affects. He
    also said, if he were Lance's physician, he would advise him to either stop
    using steroids and continue competing on a lower level, or to stop entirely.

  12. Like another poster said here: "Lance basically retires after each tdf
    for 7 years now"...."only to come out again the following year and
    start training again"

  13. Andre said:

    Like another poster said here: "Lance basically retires after each tdf
    for 7 years now"...."only to come out again the following year and
    start training again"

    If you're going to take the time to put it in quotes you can take the
    time to give credit...

    ;-)

  14. On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 15:51:04 -0700, "Rude" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    A sports physician friend of mine said that 5 to 7 years is the prescribed
    maximum use of steroids for athletes because of the long-term affects. He
    also said, if he were Lance's physician, he would advise him to either stop
    using steroids and continue competing on a lower level, or to stop entirely.

    Ahh 2 [censored] having a conversation.

    Sounds like your friend knows a lot about giving atheletes drugs.

  15. "trg" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Nah, Discovery doesn't have that kind of money. The amount they


    could/would

    Quoted message said:

    pay is small compared to what he makes as a celeb sports figure.

    Plus, they've got him hosting a show in the not so distant future which is
    another way to cash in on his celebrity.

    Really ? What kind of show ?

    Discovery is owned by Disney- c'mon, "they don't have the money ?"-
    Keeeee-rist !!!! they could do a Lance Armstong ride at Disney. A major
    motion picture ( which I recall is actually in the works ). Lance doesn't
    need the money, but he might want the passion to greet the challenge of TdF
    again.

    Laz

  16. "Rude" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    A sports physician friend of mine said that 5 to 7 years is the prescribed
    maximum use of steroids for athletes because of the long-term affects. He
    also said, if he were Lance's physician, he would advise him to either


    stop

    Quoted message said:

    using steroids and continue competing on a lower level, or to stop


    entirely.

    Quoted message said:


    you are an idiot.

  17. Quoted message said:

    On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 16:53:36 -0400, "Laz" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    It is possible that Discovery will cough up a significant cash inducement as
    they realize his marketing value compared to that of anyone else.

    They dude made 30 million or so last year, and he'll keep making
    millions without racing another day.


    A story this week in the LA Times showed Lance Armstrong as one of the
    top earning sports figures (the story was about Kobe Bryant getting
    another ad for Nike - I guess his negative image is now cleansed).

    The story showed a short chart of people, their endorsement income, and
    their total income. Armstrong's numbers were $17.5 million and $18
    million, respectively, indicating that he rides almost for free. One
    could guess he rides just to get the endorsements.

    If these figures are accurate, it seems unlikely that Discovery could
    offer him enough to get him to ride, unless he decides he needs to keep
    the endorsement money coming....

  18. Ned said:

    Ahh 2 [censored] having a conversation.
    Sounds like your friend knows a lot about giving atheletes drugs.

    Actually this physician has a great deal of experience providing training
    and medical advice to athletes. He was actually a researcher at the ASMI.

    BTW, you seem to have a preoccupation with "[censored]" are you gay Ned?

    Not that there is anything wrong with being gay, it just seems that "[censored]"
    comes out of gay people's mouths more often than hetrosexuals.

  19. On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 18:27:49 -0700, "Rude" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Not that there is anything wrong with being gay, it just seems that "[censored]"
    comes out of gay people's mouths more often than hetrosexuals.

    I don't think they "come out". Maybe in.

    And no, I'm not gay.

    But my boyfriend is. BaDumpBump.

    Not that there's anything wrong with that.

    ;-)

    D
    as in [censored].

  20. On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 15:51:04 -0700, "Rude" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    A sports physician friend of mine said that 5 to 7 years is the prescribed
    maximum use of steroids for athletes because of the long-term affects. He
    also said, if he were Lance's physician, he would advise him to either stop
    using steroids and continue competing on a lower level, or to stop entirely.


    Where's the proof - any proof - of the accusation you are making here?
    Lance has been tested backwards, forwards, sideways and upside-down
    for drugs and has always came out clean.

    Troll.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.