This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- General fitness, health and nutrition
- Published
- 5 September 2003
- Last activity
- 5 September 2003
- Original author
- Joel M. Eichen D.D.S.
- Posts
- 1
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 296
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
Original postJoel M. Eichen D.D.S.
Archived post
#1
Sad that Jan's wrod (sic) turns into a religious discussion!
Cat in the Hat.
(Jan) said:Quoted message said:Subject: Re: Why Amalgam?
From: "carabelli" [email hidden]
Date: 9/4/2003 3:54 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:>I promise not to throw it back in your face.
Then you asked if I trusted you.
Duh.
Well, when your version of logic directly links amalgams to the Crucifixion
what do you expect?
carabelli
I expect people to keep their word. You mentioned the 147,000.
When I give my wrod I keep it, you don't, and can't be trusted.
Sad that.
Jan
--
Joel M. Eichen, .
Philadelphia PA
STANDARD DISCLAIMER applies:
<You fill it in>
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users
·
0 guests
·0 bots
·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.
