General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: A vote for Mark

Started by Rich Shewmaker · · Last activity · 1 post · 327 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
18 July 2003
Last activity
18 July 2003
Original author
Rich Shewmaker
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
327
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. --

    "Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: A vote for Mark
    From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
    Date: 7/18/2003 1:23 AM Pacific Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    (Jan) said:

    >>Most likely, the first thing you would be told is not to reply to the


    likes

    Quoted message said:

    >of
    >>people like Andrew Kingoff.
    >>
    >>I makes you creditability sink to new lows.
    >>
    >>Jan
    >
    >A few days ago, I made the following comment:
    >
    >>In any
    >>case, as you told me earlier today, responding to someone is
    >>tantamount to agreeing with everything they have ever said,
    >
    >To which Jan replied:
    >
    >>No, I don't believe I say any such thing, but you sure are on
    >>a roll of lies.
    >
    In fact I have never said any such thing, and that is why you didn't


    post

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    it.

    Quoted message said:

    Once again you made it up.

    Where did I say it, Peter? Do post it.

    Go up about twenty lines. See where it says:

    Quoted message said:

    >>Most likely, the first thing you would be told is not to reply to the


    likes

    Quoted message said:

    >of
    >>people like Andrew Kingoff.
    >>
    >>I makes you creditability sink to new lows.

    That is just one place where you said it!!!

    WOW!! I said nothing whatsoever about responding to someone is tantmount


    to

    Quoted message said:

    agreeing with everything they say!!

    Quoted message said:

    I declared a moratorium on replying to Jan because of her despicable,
    deceitful conduct.

    You say that because YOU in fact of GUILTY. It is called transferring,

    Quoted message said:

    I relaxed it, but things are back to the way they
    were, so I will again refrain from responding to someone who will not
    listen,

    To YOU!! A control problem.

    will not reply to what is said,

    Mote lies. Peter,

    but will only repeat lies over

    Quoted message said:

    and over and over and ...

    Quoted message said:

    <snip Jan's inadequate response to my last moratorium notice>

    Un huh.

    Snippped because you know it is the truth.

    AND

    You can NOT back up your claims, NOT answer the questions, NOT post the


    proof.

    Quoted message said:


    You made the false accusations up.

    Restored:

    As for your being on a roll of lies, here they are, you would do well to


    back

    Quoted message said:

    up yout claims, NOT make them up.

    Quoted message said:

    I can no longer stand the deceit and the unjustified abuse.

    That was a lie. Prove whatever it is you were speaking of. Show us the


    deceit

    Quoted message said:

    and the abuse.

    Quoted message said:

    It is impossible to conduct a civilised conversation with someone who
    distorts my words, deliberately misquotes me, accuses me of lying for
    saying the truth.

    Do show us where I have distorted your words. Next, show us when I


    deliberately

    Quoted message said:

    misquoted you, then follow up with my accusing you of lying, when you were
    telling the truth.

    Quoted message said:

    Someone who will believe anything provided that it
    supports her bigotry and prejudice.

    I have neither any bigotry nor prejudice, neither do I believe *anything*.

    Quoted message said:

    but believe nothing that goes
    against these beliefs even when supported by irrefutable evidence

    Such as? Do show us what you were referring to?

    Quoted message said:

    It is not possible to conduct a rational discussion with anyone who
    rejects reason, who can believe, as examples, that the year 1830 came
    before 1646

    No such thing happen and the statement is abusrd, As I have explained to


    you

    Quoted message said:

    numerous times, it matters not when the word was *first* used, it was used
    later with the meaning I showed from several sources, including one from


    Dr

    Quoted message said:

    Jarvis who is a part of the Barrett team.

    For you to say I believe the year 1830 came before 1636 shows the nonsense


    you

    Quoted message said:

    put forth.

    Quoted message said:

    that removing an unfilled tooth to reduce amalgam load is good practice.

    I certainly have never said any such thing, so that made you 0 for 8.

    Quoted message said:

    but to object to such a fraud is evil,

    Wrong. Selective fraud.

    Quoted message said:

    that a doctor
    appearing in court must be lying but that someone defaming that doctor
    must be telling the truth,

    I never said that either, you see you have a terrible habit of making


    things

    Quoted message said:

    up.

    I stated:

    We will see as we already know Baratz has lied under oath.

    And I gave the proof, unlike you.

    Quoted message said:

    that constantly referring to another's
    religion in a secular context is not bigotry,

    I replied:

    No one is constantly doing this.

    If you have proof of the being done constantly, back it up with their very


    on

    Quoted message said:

    constant words.

    Furthermore asking someone questions is not bigotry. This bibotry, anti-
    semitism, Nazi, fascist thing was stated by your buddy Mark Probert.

    or that someone's

    Quoted message said:

    opinion must be devalued because they once posted something to a forum
    for the discussion of homosexuality.

    Nothing was said about opinon being devalued.

    Unlike you, I proved what was said, then you twisted it into your very own
    dishonest, make things up as you go world. RIGHT AFTER ACCUSING ME OF
    DISTORTING YOUR WORDS.

    So once again we see what the dubunkers falsely accuse others of is EXACTY


    what

    Quoted message said:

    they do themselves.

    What was said:

    I am sorry Eric, but your choice of likestyle is displeasing in God's


    sight,

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    and is not how he created man. It is a product of Satan.

    God's words:

    Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers,


    nor

    Quoted message said:

    homosexuals, nor sodomites, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor
    revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God." 1 Corinthians


    6:9,

    Quoted message said:

    10

    You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is abomination."


    Leviticus

    Quoted message said:

    18:22

    "But the cowardly, unbelieving, abominable, murderers, sexually immoral,
    sorcerers, idolaters, and all liars shall have their part in the lake


    which

    Quoted message said:

    burns with fire and brimstone, which is the second death." Revelation


    21:8.

    Quoted message said:

    One can therefore be tempted by homosexuality, but repulse that temptation


    and

    Quoted message said:

    not sin (James 1:14, 15).

    "But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: For men


    will be

    Quoted message said:

    lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers,
    disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving,


    slanderers,

    Quoted message said:

    without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong,


    haughty,

    Quoted message said:

    lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God." 2 Timothy 3:1-4.
    Post a follow-up to this message

    Quoted message said:

    From now until I change my mind (which could be any time in the future
    ranging from a nanosecond from now until I see four horsemen riding
    down my street) I will not be responding to anything that Jan Drew
    says.

    That is your choice.

    Seems to come at a convenient time as I asked you pointed questions, you


    could

    Quoted message said:

    not answer without showing the lies of you buddies.

    As in Peter Moran's LIES about what Dr Wilson did,,,,,,,,DELIBERATELY!!

    Quoted message said:

    I have better things to do with my time than to subject myself
    to abuse.

    You have overlooked the real abuse here.

    Quoted message said:

    And Jan, don't bother to respond to this because I won't bite.

    Your chioce. The above is just more lies, Peter.

    Quoted message said:

    In any
    case, as you told me earlier today, responding to someone is
    tantamount to agreeing with everything they have ever said,

    No, I don't believe I say any such thing, but you sure are on a roll of


    lies.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    and I am sure you wouldn't want to be seen to agree with me

    No at all, I agree with truthful statements, doesn't matter which camp it


    comes

    Quoted message said:

    from,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,unlike the debunker group.

    Quoted message said:

    And I most definitely do not want anyone to have even a picosuspicion


    that I

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    might agree with you.

    Why would that be??

    You sound angry, Peter, that happens when lies catch up with those who


    tell

    Quoted message said:

    them.

    Jan

    Quoted message said:

    Q.E.D. Sad.

    INDEED. When will you ever learn?!/!

    $ KaChing ;o) Rich

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.