General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: Barrett & NCAHF

Started by Jan · · Last activity · 1 post · 546 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
2 July 2003
Last activity
2 July 2003
Original author
Jan
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
546
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Barrett & NCAHF
    From: "Peter Moran" [email hidden]
    Date: 7/1/2003 6:30 PM Central Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    "Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Barrett & NCAHF

    Quoted message said:


    Tell us what you think of lawsuits being decided on accusations ONLY, with
    little or no evidence???

    God, Jan, can't you bloody-well read?????!!!!

    YEP!!

    Can you??

    http://www.healthfreedomlaw.com/

    ****existing law should be changed to allow plaintiffs, such as NCAHF, to bring
    lawsuits****

    ( laws should be changed to help Barrett wipe out any alternative medicine)

    ***with little or no evidence***

    $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$(CAN YOU BELIEVE THIS?!?!?!)$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

    against a targeted company***

    *** and, thereafter, force the targeted company to defend itself on the basis
    of an accusation alone. ***

    So do tell us Peter, should lawsuits be judged on accusations ALONE??

    WITH LITTLE OR NO EVIDENCE???

    Just answer the question please.

    Jan

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.