Road Cycling · Public discussion

Stage 1 query...

Started by Jaybee · · Last activity · 19 posts · 889 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
2 July 2005
Last activity
4 July 2005
Original author
Jaybee
Posts
19
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
889
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–19 of 19
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I haven't seen such a disparity between the leader and the others in a TT of this
    length. I am happy for Zabriskie, but based on the differences, is there any
    possibility, even in this event, that there was a timing error in his run?

  2. Quoted message said:

    I haven't seen such a disparity between the leader and the others in a
    TT of this length. I am happy for Zabriskie, but based on the
    differences, is there any possibility, even in this event, that there
    was a timing error in his run?

    I think if they show the actual speed of the riders, it would show
    Zabriskie's time to be accurate. His is the fastest ever in a TdF time
    trial(not including prologues) at almost 55km/h.

    d
    --
    "I caught a snuffleufagus and smoked a boogaloo spliff"

    --dani--

    It's a blog: http://innadaze.blogspot.com

  3. no chance!

    I'm thinking shifting winds.

    "Jaybee" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I haven't seen such a disparity between the leader and the others in a TT
    of this length. I am happy for Zabriskie, but based on the differences,
    is there any possibility, even in this event, that there was a timing error
    in his run?

  4. Michael said:
    Quoted message said:

    Armstrong doesn't gain 6 seconds on a guy from check point one to
    check point two and then lose 5 of them, and the win, without
    something going on. Maybe he spent it all blowing by Ullrich. Maybe he
    wanted another American to get a Yellow Jersey. Maybe he didn't want
    to be put in the position of trying to wire to wire the race.

    Winds, slipped pedal, increased humidity, blah blah...

    It's doing a disservice to Zabriskie to indicate in any way that he
    didn't earn or deserve this great win.

    I don't know, but no matter what went on Zabriskie is really
    establishing himself now. Vuelta, Giro and now TdF. Fantastic.

    The big question is whether or not CSC will hold it through the TTT.

    D

    They will certainly try to defend the Mellow Johnny. It's difficult to believe
    that Armstrong calculated that CSC would do the work for the first few
    stages and so let Zabriskie win, but that's the effect.

    m.

    Well, Armstrong had all day (over 2 hours) knowing that CSC had it.
    They could have come up with a plan that was contingent on how the top
    GC rivals did.

    Or maybe he just wanted to stay in sight of Jan to rub it in, lol.

    D

  5. I didn't mean to take anything away from him...I alluded to wind before
    Armstrong et al started...I was thinking it was odd to see the early
    starters maintaining good positions...guys like bodrogi and wauters staying
    so high in the placings...

    Believe me, I was happy to see Zab take the victory.

    "David Ferguson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Armstrong doesn't gain 6 seconds on a guy from check point one to
    check point two and then lose 5 of them, and the win, without
    something going on. Maybe he spent it all blowing by Ullrich. Maybe he
    wanted another American to get a Yellow Jersey. Maybe he didn't want
    to be put in the position of trying to wire to wire the race.

    Winds, slipped pedal, increased humidity, blah blah...

    It's doing a disservice to Zabriskie to indicate in any way that he
    didn't earn or deserve this great win.

    I don't know, but no matter what went on Zabriskie is really
    establishing himself now. Vuelta, Giro and now TdF. Fantastic.

    The big question is whether or not CSC will hold it through the TTT.

    D

  6. David Ferguson said:

    Armstrong doesn't gain 6 seconds on a guy from check point one to
    check point two and then lose 5 of them, and the win, without
    something going on. Maybe he spent it all blowing by Ullrich.

    That's exactly the kind of thing that happens if the wind has
    changed between the two riders.

    Quoted message said:

    Maybe he wanted another American to get a Yellow Jersey.

    Don't kid yourself. If anything, the Other American factor
    is evidence that LANCE didn't deliberately let the jersey go.

    LANCE's gap over the other riders is so big (and the gaps from
    3rd on so small) that it's reminiscent of the Chung Chart of
    the worlds TT with Millar as the complete outlier:
    http://mywebpage.netscape.com/rechung/temp/tt.png
    If not for Zabriskie's excellent performance, people might start
    to talk.

    Quoted message said:

    It's doing a disservice to Zabriskie to indicate in any way that he
    didn't earn or deserve this great win.

    I don't know, but no matter what went on Zabriskie is really
    establishing himself now. Vuelta, Giro and now TdF. Fantastic.

    The big question is whether or not CSC will hold it through the TTT.

  7. quote:
    They will certainly try to defend the Mellow Johnny. It's difficult to
    believe
    that Armstrong calculated that CSC would do the work for the first few
    stages and so let Zabriskie win, but that's the effect.

    It has NOTHING to so with "knowing" CSC would work.. however gets
    yellow will work. He didn't have to "know" or "calculate" that CSC
    would do the work.. If he finishes 2nd.. it's ideal..

  8. David Ferguson said:

    It's doing a disservice to Zabriskie to indicate in any way that he
    didn't earn or deserve this great win.

    Ya, imagine how much time DZ would have gained on LA if they'd both had
    Lance's superbike...

    Jim

  9. Quoted message said:


    LANCE's gap over the other riders is so big (and the gaps from
    3rd on so small) that it's reminiscent of the Chung Chart of
    the worlds TT with Millar as the complete outlier:
    http://mywebpage.netscape.com/rechung/temp/tt.png

    This is better:
    http://anonymous.coward.free.fr/rbr/world2003tt.png

    Quoted message said:

    If not for Zabriskie's excellent performance, people might start
    to talk.

    http://anonymous.coward.free.fr/rbr/tdf05-1.png

  10. Robert Chung said:

    http://anonymous.coward.free.fr/rbr/tdf05-1.png

    So Piepoli sucks?

    I think that's what you call a 'psyche' on the part of Lance. Extra
    drug-tested to emphasize how clean he is, then daylight between him and
    almost the entire field (and no tailwind).

  11. Stewart Fleming said:
    Robert Chung said:

    http://anonymous.coward.free.fr/rbr/tdf05-1.png

    So Piepoli sucks?

    I think that's what you call a 'psyche' on the part of Lance. Extra
    drug-tested to emphasize how clean he is, then daylight between him and
    almost the entire field (and no tailwind).

    so does the extra drug testing mean anything? You could say Zabriskie
    had the early tailwind, but what did LANCE have?

  12. Robert Chung said:

    [email hidden] wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    LANCE's gap over the other riders is so big (and the gaps from
    3rd on so small) that it's reminiscent of the Chung Chart of
    the worlds TT with Millar as the complete outlier:
    http://mywebpage.netscape.com/rechung/temp/tt.png

    This is better:
    http://anonymous.coward.free.fr/rbr/world2003tt.png

    Quoted message said:

    If not for Zabriskie's excellent performance, people might start
    to talk.

    http://anonymous.coward.free.fr/rbr/tdf05-1.png

    Interesting. Looks like Landis, Ullrich and Leipheimer didn't
    warm up enough, or went out a little too conservatively. Not
    that it would have changed things much. Piepoli must have
    started his KOM strategy early.

    I believe this is Georgie-Porgie's third 4th place in a Tour
    de France stage (and one 3rd).

  13. "gym.gravity" <[email hidden]> wrote ...

    Quoted message said:


    so does the extra drug testing mean anything? You could say Zabriskie
    had the early tailwind, but what did LANCE have?

    penache

  14. Jim Flom said:

    "gym.gravity" <[email hidden]> wrote ...

    Quoted message said:


    so does the extra drug testing mean anything? You could say Zabriskie
    had the early tailwind, but what did LANCE have?

    penache

    Anger too, maybe.

    Cyclingnews says the wind was constant all day, so Zabriskie must have
    some penache too, a lot of it. Must have been at least a 2000mg plug.
    This is the second time he won a time trial from the first wave of
    riders.

  15. On 07/02/2005 08:14 PM, in article dSHxe.89672$HI.28655@edtnps84, "Jim

    Flom said:

    "gym.gravity" <[email hidden]> wrote ...

    Quoted message said:


    so does the extra drug testing mean anything? You could say Zabriskie
    had the early tailwind, but what did LANCE have?

    penache

    As long as he doesn't have any of that silly panache stuff ...

    So how do you make a penache? You let the ink run dry!

    --
    Steven L. Sheffield
    stevens at veloworks dot com
    bellum pax est libertas servitus est ignoratio vis est
    ess ay ell tea ell ay kay ee sea eye tee why you ti ay aitch
    aitch tee tea pea colon [for word] slash [four ward] slash double-you
    double-yew double-ewe dot veloworks dot com [foreword] slash

  16. Dans le message de
    news:[email hidden],
    gym.gravity <[email hidden]> a réfléchi, et puis a déclaré :

    Quoted message said:
    Jim Flom said:

    "gym.gravity" <[email hidden]> wrote ...

    Quoted message said:


    so does the extra drug testing mean anything? You could say
    Zabriskie had the early tailwind, but what did LANCE have?

    penache

    Anger too, maybe.

    Cyclingnews says the wind was constant all day, so Zabriskie must have
    some penache too, a lot of it. Must have been at least a 2000mg plug.
    This is the second time he won a time trial from the first wave of
    riders.

    Peniche or panaché.
    Chose or take both. I would.
    --
    Bonne route !

    Sandy
    Vreneuil-sur-Seine FR

  17. "Sandy" <[email hidden]> wrote ...

    Quoted message said:


    Peniche or panaché.
    Chose or take both. I would.

    Pitooey! :-P

  18. Steven L. Sheffield said:

    On 07/02/2005 08:14 PM, in article dSHxe.89672$HI.28655@edtnps84, "Jim

    Flom said:

    "gym.gravity" <[email hidden]> wrote ...

    Quoted message said:


    so does the extra drug testing mean anything? You could say Zabriskie
    had the early tailwind, but what did LANCE have?

    penache

    As long as he doesn't have any of that silly panache stuff ...

    So how do you make a penache? You let the ink run dry!

    whoops.

    2000mg panache suppository. Add 2000mg panache, a few drops of olive
    oil, corn starch and stick it in this:

    http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=135&item=6543548775&rd=1&ssPageName=WDVW

  19. gym.gravity said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > so does the extra drug testing mean anything? You could say Zabriskie
    > had the early tailwind, but what did LANCE have?
    penache

    Steven L. Sheffield said:
    Quoted message said:

    As long as he doesn't have any of that silly panache stuff ...
    So how do you make a penache? You let the ink run dry!

    gym.gravity said:

    whoops.

    2000mg panache suppository. Add 2000mg panache, a few drops of olive
    oil, corn starch and stick it in this:

    Dumbass,
    Panache occurs naturally in krispy kreme doughnuts. I thought all rbr
    fatty masters dopers knew that.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.