General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: Acid-base diet

Started by Susan · · Last activity · 4 posts · 314 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
1 July 2005
Last activity
1 July 2005
Original author
Susan
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
314
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. x-no-archive: yes

    Enrico C said:

    I am trying to understand if there is some truth in the acid-base diet
    theory. I've been reading different opinions on the net.

    Anyway, I see there are studies on Pubnet about acid-base balance in diet.
    What do you make of this article, for instance?

    It's been disproven many times over.

    Susan

  2. On Fri, 01 Jul 2005 17:07:46 -0400, Susan wrote in
    <news:[email hidden]> on
    sci.med.nutrition,sci.bio.food-science :

    Quoted message said:

    x-no-archive: yes

    Enrico C said:

    I am trying to understand if there is some truth in the acid-base diet
    theory. I've been reading different opinions on the net.

    Anyway, I see there are studies on Pubnet about acid-base balance in diet.
    What do you make of this article, for instance?

    It's been disproven many times over.

    You mean the content of that article has been disproven?

    Quoted message said:


    http://www.nutrition.org/cgi/content/full/128/6/1051
    The Journal of Nutrition Vol. 128 No. 6 June 1998, pp. 1051-1053
    Excess Dietary Protein Can Adversely Affect Bone1,2

    Uriel S. Barzel3 and Linda K. Massey*, 4

    X'Posted to: sci.med.nutrition,sci.bio.food-science

  3. x-no-archive: yes

    Enrico C said:

    You mean the content of that article has been disproven?

    Sorry, I'm in severe dental pain, and am not taking time with my posts.

    The assertions about the impacts of protein have been rebutted by quite
    a few studies.

    Susan

  4. On Fri, 01 Jul 2005 18:25:44 -0400, Susan wrote in
    <news:[email hidden]> on
    sci.med.nutrition,sci.bio.food-science :

    Quoted message said:

    x-no-archive: yes

    Enrico C said:

    You mean the content of that article has been disproven?

    Sorry, I'm in severe dental pain, and am not taking time with my posts.

    No probl 🙂

    Quoted message said:


    The assertions about the impacts of protein have been rebutted by quite
    a few studies.

    Well, I agree that's an hypothetis, not a "fact".
    Yet, it seems to me some recent studies confirm it...

    Here is one, for instance...

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=15691900&query_hl=9
    J Appl Physiol. 2005 Feb 3; [Epub ahead of print]

    Amino acid supplementation alters bone metabolism during simulated
    weightlessness.

    Zwart SR, Davis-Street JE, Paddon-Jones D, Ferrando AA, Wolfe RR, Smith SM.

    Human Adaptation and Countermeasures, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston,
    TX, USA.

    High-protein and acidogenic diets induce hypercalciuria. Foods or
    supplements with excess sulfur-containing amino acids increase endogenous
    sulfuric acid production, and therefore have the potential to increase
    calcium excretion and alter bone metabolism. In this study, effects of an
    amino acid/carbohydrate supplement on bone resorption were examined during
    bed rest. Thirteen subjects were divided at random into 2 groups: a control
    group (CON, n = 6) and an amino acid/carbohydrate supplemented group (AA, n
    = 7) who consumed an extra 49.5 g essential amino acids and 90 g
    carbohydrate per day for 28 d. Urine was collected for ntelopeptide (NTX),
    deoxypyridinoline (DPD), calcium, and pH determinations. Bone mineral
    content (BMC) was determined and potential renal acid load (PRAL) was
    calculated. Bonespecific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP) was measured in serum
    samples collected on day 1 (immediately before bed rest) and on day 28.
    PRAL was higher in the AA group than in the CON group during bed rest (P <
    0.05). For all subjects, during bed rest urinary NTX and DPD concentrations
    were greater than pre-bed rest levels (P < 0.05). Urinary NTX and DPD
    tended to be higher in the AA group (P = 0.073 and P = 0.056,
    respectively). During bed rest, urinary calcium was greater than baseline
    levels (P < 0.05) in the AA group but not the CON group. Total BMC was
    lower after bed rest than before bed rest in the AA group but not the CON
    group (P < 0.05). During bed rest, urinary pH decreased (P < 0.05), and was
    lower in the AA group than the CON group. These data suggest that bone
    resorption increased, without changes in bone formation, in the AA group.

    PMID: 15691900 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

    X'Posted to: sci.med.nutrition,sci.bio.food-science

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.