General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: average walking speed

Started by Roger · · Last activity · 3 posts · 909 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
13 June 2005
Last activity
13 June 2005
Original author
Roger
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
909
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. The message <[email hidden]>
    from "Roy" <roy> contains these words:

    Quoted message said:

    Naismith's rule says 3mph +1/2 hr
    per 1000ft of ascent (in old money for folks of my age). Naismith includes
    odd stops to check out the views and catch your breath, but not lunch
    stops.

    FWIW Naismith never said anything about excluding lunch stops and the
    original form of words avoided the misleading reference to mph.

    --
    Roger Chapman
    sig file out of date

  2. "Roger" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The message <[email hidden]>
    from "Roy" <roy> contains these words:

    Quoted message said:

    Naismith's rule says 3mph +1/2 hr
    per 1000ft of ascent (in old money for folks of my age). Naismith


    includes

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    odd stops to check out the views and catch your breath, but not lunch
    stops.

    FWIW Naismith never said anything about excluding lunch stops and the
    original form of words avoided the misleading reference to mph.

    It was only a suggestion as well to get you started as an average for fit
    people on average terrain who want to walk all day. The important thing is
    to start with something like this, work out how wrong it is for *you* (OR
    the walk you are doing) and come up with your own figures. Do a route plan
    with the ascent and distances, estimate the time taken (including stops) and
    see how far out you are. I mark ones I do with "OFP" - Old Fart's Pace - a
    slightly more leisurely interpretation. It would be ridiculous (and wrong)
    to base a day out in the hills and estimate a return time on someone else's
    figures.

    --
    Bob Mannix
    (anti-spam is as easy as 1-2-3 - not)

  3. The message <[email hidden]>
    from "Bob Mannix" <[email hidden]> contains these words:

    Quoted message said:

    It was only a suggestion as well to get you started as an average for fit
    people on average terrain who want to walk all day. The important thing is
    to start with something like this, work out how wrong it is for *you* (OR
    the walk you are doing) and come up with your own figures. Do a route plan
    with the ascent and distances, estimate the time taken (including stops) and
    see how far out you are. I mark ones I do with "OFP" - Old Fart's Pace - a
    slightly more leisurely interpretation. It would be ridiculous (and wrong)
    to base a day out in the hills and estimate a return time on someone else's
    figures.

    It all depends on what you want to estimate. IIRC the op was asking
    about average walking speeds which is a bit of a 'how long is a piece of
    string' question. I can average 4.5 mph on a flat road for up to half an
    hour after which I am exhausted and I could be put in the same state in
    the same timescale trying to average 1 mph over nominally flat difficult
    ground. OTOH a typical hill walk on my own would probably average
    somewhere between 2 and 2.5 mph without counting the stops (and only
    marginally less with the stops). However it has been some years since I
    was confident that I could easily manage more than 15 miles and 4000
    feet of ascent in a single day. And it is the amount of ascent that is
    the more important factor, at least to me, not having limitless energy
    (or for that matter elastic knees) at my disposal.

    Naismith (or some personal variation of it) gives an indication of the
    total time for a walk. Trying to apply it to short sections will give
    very optimistic and/or misleading results which will vary depending on
    how hard the walk is and may vary depending on the time of day and how
    good the walker is at pacing him/herself.

    --
    Roger Chapman so far this year 43 summits
    New - 20 (Marilyns 6, Nuttalls 5, Outlying Fells 10)
    Repeats - 23 (Marilyns 7, Nuttalls 14, Wainwrights 12, Outlying Fells 0)

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.