Matt B said:Why would simply because I am interested in road safety on bikes?
Because as you say later: "you should pay _full_ attention to the job in
hand as a road user".
Unless you believe that a car driver can pay full attention with a
stereo on and yet cyclists can't.
Quoted message said:In reply to an idiotic statement?
No it wasn't an idiotic statement. Did you mean that to be a question,
or can you not bring yourself to actually answer something straight?
Quoted message said:The PP justified using a personal stereo
on a bike because he could still hear approaching vehicles, AFAIK you could
still _see_ approaching vehicles whilst using video glasses.
Which would presumably be safe in a car for the same reason.
Quoted message said:You disagree that you should pay _full_ attention to the job in hand as a
road user on a pedal cycle?
FSVO full attention. Since the likely outcome of failing to pay full
attention due to headphone wearing on a bike is death for the rider, I
would suggest that that is their decision to make. They are unlikely to
take anyone with them.
If they are aware of what is going on around them, then they are in the
same situation that they were in without headphones. Perhaps (by your
reasoning), deaf people shouldn't cycle.
Quoted message said:Me? Of what? I never made the unsubstantiated accusation.
Of your ability to function as either a human being or as a rational
debater. Your posts read like those of a inexperienced chair trying to
look clever. Try submitting information / personal opinions from time to
time and you may reduce the number of people that kill-file you. This
would also reduce the number of people who simply believe you to be a
class A [censored]. :-)
Jon