Re: "I feel fine"

On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 15:57:47 GMT, "CHUCK MARTIN"
<[email hidden]> wrote:

==>
==>"vonroach" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
==>news:[email hidden]...
==>> On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 21:57:04 -0500, John M. Williams
==>> <[email hidden]> wrote:
==>>
==>>>Actually, I think it was Bill Clinton who was sued for shoving his
==>>>[censored] in someone's face.
==>>>
==>>>HTH
==>> And lying under oath, just two of his lesser crimes in office.
==>
==>YEAH, CONSENTUAL, ADULT, LEGAL AND MUTUALLY AGREED UPON SEX. BUT THE REPUBLI
==>CON SCUM BNAGS USED IT TO BRING DOWN A POPULAR PRESIDENT. FACT IS THAT IF
==>CLINTON WERE TO RUN TODAY HE'D BEAT GOOBER BUSH'S DUNCE ASS BUT GOOD. POLLS
==>HILLARY COULD DO THE SAME

True.

But I have to point out that the Repugs' assault on
the Democratic president -- and the truth -- didn't
"bring down" Clinton. He finished out his second
term and remains one of the most popular men
in America today.

Yours for accuracy in reporting. . . .

--
The Republican party is the deadly enemy of peace,
freedom, justice and human rights everywhere.
The world won't be safe until its destruction is
complete.
-Ivan Gowch

Ivan Gowch said:

On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 15:57:47 GMT, "CHUCK MARTIN"
<[email hidden]> wrote:
==>"vonroach" <[email hidden]> wrote:
==>> On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 21:57:04 -0500, John M. Williams
==>> <[email hidden]> wrote:
==>>
==>>>Actually, I think it was Bill Clinton who was sued for shoving his
==>>>[censored] in someone's face.
==>>>
==>>>HTH
==>> And lying under oath, just two of his lesser crimes in office.
==>
==>YEAH, CONSENTUAL, ADULT, LEGAL AND MUTUALLY AGREED UPON SEX. BUT THE REPUBLI
==>CON SCUM BNAGS USED IT TO BRING DOWN A POPULAR PRESIDENT. FACT IS THAT IF
==>CLINTON WERE TO RUN TODAY HE'D BEAT GOOBER BUSH'S DUNCE ASS BUT GOOD. POLLS
==>HILLARY COULD DO THE SAME

True.

But I have to point out that the Repugs' assault on
the Democratic president -- and the truth -- didn't
"bring down" Clinton. He finished out his second
term and remains one of the most popular men
in America today.

Yours for accuracy in reporting. . . .

It appears that you two were still committed to a mental institution
back in November 2004, when this thread was originally posted, and
thus, you could not respond. I am glad your condition has improved.
Please remember to take your meds.

"Ivan Gowch" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 15:57:47 GMT, "CHUCK MARTIN"
<[email hidden]> wrote:

==>
==>"vonroach" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
==>news:[email hidden]...
==>> On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 21:57:04 -0500, John M. Williams
==>> <[email hidden]> wrote:
==>>
==>>>Actually, I think it was Bill Clinton who was sued for shoving his
==>>>[censored] in someone's face.
==>>>
==>>>HTH
==>> And lying under oath, just two of his lesser crimes in office.
==>
==>YEAH, CONSENTUAL, ADULT, LEGAL AND MUTUALLY AGREED UPON SEX. BUT THE
REPUBLI
==>CON SCUM BNAGS USED IT TO BRING DOWN A POPULAR PRESIDENT. FACT IS
THAT IF
==>CLINTON WERE TO RUN TODAY HE'D BEAT GOOBER BUSH'S DUNCE ASS BUT GOOD.
POLLS
==>HILLARY COULD DO THE SAME

True.

But I have to point out that the Repugs' assault on
the Democratic president -- and the truth -- didn't
"bring down" Clinton. He finished out his second
term and remains one of the most popular men
in America today.

Yours for accuracy in reporting. . . .

YOU ARE RIGHT. THANKS FOR SETTING THE RECORD STRIGHT. REPUKES HAVE A WAY OF
TOTAL DISTORTION OF FACTS WHICH THEY HATE

Quoted message said:

--
The Republican party is the deadly enemy of peace,
freedom, justice and human rights everywhere.
The world won't be safe until its destruction is
complete.
-Ivan Gowch

"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Ivan Gowch said:

On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 15:57:47 GMT, "CHUCK MARTIN"
<[email hidden]> wrote:
==>"vonroach" <[email hidden]> wrote:
==>> On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 21:57:04 -0500, John M. Williams
==>> <[email hidden]> wrote:
==>>
==>>>Actually, I think it was Bill Clinton who was sued for shoving his
==>>>[censored] in someone's face.
==>>>
==>>>HTH
==>> And lying under oath, just two of his lesser crimes in office.
==>
==>YEAH, CONSENTUAL, ADULT, LEGAL AND MUTUALLY AGREED UPON SEX. BUT THE
REPUBLI
==>CON SCUM BNAGS USED IT TO BRING DOWN A POPULAR PRESIDENT. FACT IS
THAT IF
==>CLINTON WERE TO RUN TODAY HE'D BEAT GOOBER BUSH'S DUNCE ASS BUT GOOD.
POLLS
==>HILLARY COULD DO THE SAME

True.

But I have to point out that the Repugs' assault on
the Democratic president -- and the truth -- didn't
"bring down" Clinton. He finished out his second
term and remains one of the most popular men
in America today.

Yours for accuracy in reporting. . . .

It appears that you two were still committed to a mental institution
back in November 2004, when this thread was originally posted, and
thus, you could not respond. I am glad your condition has improved.
Please remember to take your meds.

TYPICAL DIRT BAG REPUBLI CON [censored]

CHUCK MARTIN said:

"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Ivan Gowch said:

On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 15:57:47 GMT, "CHUCK MARTIN"
<[email hidden]> wrote:
==>"vonroach" <[email hidden]> wrote:
==>> On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 21:57:04 -0500, John M. Williams
==>> <[email hidden]> wrote:
==>>
==>>>Actually, I think it was Bill Clinton who was sued for shoving
his ==>>>[censored] in someone's face.
==>>>
==>>>HTH
==>> And lying under oath, just two of his lesser crimes in office.
==>
==>YEAH, CONSENTUAL, ADULT, LEGAL AND MUTUALLY AGREED UPON SEX. BUT
THE REPUBLI
==>CON SCUM BNAGS USED IT TO BRING DOWN A POPULAR PRESIDENT. FACT
IS THAT IF
==>CLINTON WERE TO RUN TODAY HE'D BEAT GOOBER BUSH'S DUNCE ASS BUT
GOOD. POLLS
==>HILLARY COULD DO THE SAME

True.

But I have to point out that the Repugs' assault on
the Democratic president -- and the truth -- didn't
"bring down" Clinton. He finished out his second
term and remains one of the most popular men
in America today.

Yours for accuracy in reporting. . . .

It appears that you two were still committed to a mental institution
back in November 2004, when this thread was originally posted, and
thus, you could not respond. I am glad your condition has improved.
Please remember to take your meds.

TYPICAL DIRT BAG REPUBLI CON [censored]

It's times like this that it's nice to bring up...WHO WON THE ELECTION.

It's nice to see you demoncrats throwing fits. Makes me feel warm and fuzzy
inside.
--
-Larry

"Larry Hodges" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

CHUCK MARTIN said:

"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Ivan Gowch <[email hidden]> wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 15:57:47 GMT, "CHUCK MARTIN"
> <[email hidden]> wrote:
> ==>"vonroach" <[email hidden]> wrote:
> ==>> On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 21:57:04 -0500, John M. Williams
> ==>> <[email hidden]> wrote:
> ==>>
> ==>>>Actually, I think it was Bill Clinton who was sued for shoving
> his ==>>>[censored] in someone's face.
> ==>>>
> ==>>>HTH
> ==>> And lying under oath, just two of his lesser crimes in office.
> ==>
> ==>YEAH, CONSENTUAL, ADULT, LEGAL AND MUTUALLY AGREED UPON SEX. BUT
> THE REPUBLI
> ==>CON SCUM BNAGS USED IT TO BRING DOWN A POPULAR PRESIDENT. FACT
> IS THAT IF
> ==>CLINTON WERE TO RUN TODAY HE'D BEAT GOOBER BUSH'S DUNCE ASS BUT
> GOOD. POLLS
> ==>HILLARY COULD DO THE SAME
>
> True.
>
> But I have to point out that the Repugs' assault on
> the Democratic president -- and the truth -- didn't
> "bring down" Clinton. He finished out his second
> term and remains one of the most popular men
> in America today.
>
> Yours for accuracy in reporting. . . .

It appears that you two were still committed to a mental institution
back in November 2004, when this thread was originally posted, and
thus, you could not respond. I am glad your condition has improved.
Please remember to take your meds.

TYPICAL DIRT BAG REPUBLI CON [censored]

It's times like this that it's nice to bring up...WHO WON THE ELECTION.

HOWEVER, GOOBER BUSH'S FIRST TERM WAS A SELECTION, NOT ELECTION. SECOND TERM
WAS RIDDLED WITH OHIO IRREGULATIONS. BUSH WILL FOREVER BE COMPRIMISED FOR
ELECTION FRAUD AND ROVE'S SCAMS AND EVIL WITH THE "PAID" [censored] BOAT LIARS
[censored] BY MEN WHO NEVER KNEW HIM OR SERVED WITH HIM. REPUBLI CON
CORRUPTION AT IT'S BEST

Quoted message said:

It's nice to see you demoncrats throwing fits. Makes me feel warm and
fuzzy inside.
--
-Larry

CHUCK MARTIN said:

Larry Hodges said:

CHUCK MARTIN said:

TYPICAL DIRT BAG REPUBLI CON [censored]

It's times like this that it's nice to bring up...WHO WON THE ELECTION.

HOWEVER, GOOBER BUSH'S FIRST TERM WAS A SELECTION, NOT ELECTION. SECOND TERM
WAS RIDDLED WITH OHIO IRREGULATIONS. BUSH WILL FOREVER BE COMPRIMISED FOR
ELECTION FRAUD AND ROVE'S SCAMS AND EVIL WITH THE "PAID" [censored] BOAT LIARS
[censored] BY MEN WHO NEVER KNEW HIM OR SERVED WITH HIM. REPUBLI CON
CORRUPTION AT IT'S BEST

I love your all-caps nutjob schtick! Is the RNC paying you as much as
they pay Henry?
--

JMW
http://www.rustyiron.net

CHUCK MARTIN said:

"Larry Hodges" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

CHUCK MARTIN said:

"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> Ivan Gowch <[email hidden]> wrote:
>> On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 15:57:47 GMT, "CHUCK MARTIN"
>> <[email hidden]> wrote:
>> ==>"vonroach" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>> ==>> On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 21:57:04 -0500, John M. Williams
>> ==>> <[email hidden]> wrote:
>> ==>>
>> ==>>>Actually, I think it was Bill Clinton who was sued for
>> shoving his ==>>>[censored] in someone's face.
>> ==>>>
>> ==>>>HTH
>> ==>> And lying under oath, just two of his lesser crimes in
>> office. ==>
>> ==>YEAH, CONSENTUAL, ADULT, LEGAL AND MUTUALLY AGREED UPON SEX.
>> BUT THE REPUBLI
>> ==>CON SCUM BNAGS USED IT TO BRING DOWN A POPULAR PRESIDENT. FACT IS
>> THAT IF
>> ==>CLINTON WERE TO RUN TODAY HE'D BEAT GOOBER BUSH'S DUNCE ASS BUT
>> GOOD. POLLS
>> ==>HILLARY COULD DO THE SAME
>>
>> True.
>>
>> But I have to point out that the Repugs' assault on
>> the Democratic president -- and the truth -- didn't
>> "bring down" Clinton. He finished out his second
>> term and remains one of the most popular men
>> in America today.
>>
>> Yours for accuracy in reporting. . . .
>
> It appears that you two were still committed to a mental
> institution back in November 2004, when this thread was originally
> posted, and thus, you could not respond. I am glad your condition
> has improved. Please remember to take your meds.

TYPICAL DIRT BAG REPUBLI CON [censored]

It's times like this that it's nice to bring up...WHO WON THE
ELECTION.

HOWEVER, GOOBER BUSH'S FIRST TERM WAS A SELECTION, NOT ELECTION.
SECOND TERM WAS RIDDLED WITH OHIO IRREGULATIONS. BUSH WILL FOREVER
BE COMPRIMISED FOR ELECTION FRAUD AND ROVE'S SCAMS AND EVIL WITH THE
"PAID" [censored] BOAT LIARS [censored] BY MEN WHO NEVER KNEW HIM OR SERVED
WITH HIM. REPUBLI CON CORRUPTION AT IT'S BEST

Quoted message said:

It's nice to see you demoncrats throwing fits. Makes me feel warm
and fuzzy inside.
--
-Larry

Type louder, I can't hear you.
--
-Larry

"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

CHUCK MARTIN said:

Larry Hodges said:

CHUCK MARTIN wrote:
>
> TYPICAL DIRT BAG REPUBLI CON [censored]

It's times like this that it's nice to bring up...WHO WON THE ELECTION.

HOWEVER, GOOBER BUSH'S FIRST TERM WAS A SELECTION, NOT ELECTION. SECOND
TERM
WAS RIDDLED WITH OHIO IRREGULATIONS. BUSH WILL FOREVER BE COMPRIMISED FOR
ELECTION FRAUD AND ROVE'S SCAMS AND EVIL WITH THE "PAID" [censored] BOAT LIARS
[censored] BY MEN WHO NEVER KNEW HIM OR SERVED WITH HIM. REPUBLI CON
CORRUPTION AT IT'S BEST

I love your all-caps nutjob schtick! Is the RNC paying you as much as
they pay Henry?

GLAD YOU LIKE THE CAPS REPUKE NAZI BOY, however, is the rnc and carl rove or
druggo limpballs paying you more than hackhead hannity to post this kind of
lies and hate

Quoted message said:

--

JMW
http://www.rustyiron.net

"Larry Hodges" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

CHUCK MARTIN said:

"Larry Hodges" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

CHUCK MARTIN wrote:
> "JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
> news:[email hidden]...
>> Ivan Gowch <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 15:57:47 GMT, "CHUCK MARTIN"
>>> <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>> ==>"vonroach" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>> ==>> On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 21:57:04 -0500, John M. Williams
>>> ==>> <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>> ==>>
>>> ==>>>Actually, I think it was Bill Clinton who was sued for
>>> shoving his ==>>>[censored] in someone's face.
>>> ==>>>
>>> ==>>>HTH
>>> ==>> And lying under oath, just two of his lesser crimes in
>>> office. ==>
>>> ==>YEAH, CONSENTUAL, ADULT, LEGAL AND MUTUALLY AGREED UPON SEX.
>>> BUT THE REPUBLI
>>> ==>CON SCUM BNAGS USED IT TO BRING DOWN A POPULAR PRESIDENT. FACT IS
>>> THAT IF
>>> ==>CLINTON WERE TO RUN TODAY HE'D BEAT GOOBER BUSH'S DUNCE ASS BUT
>>> GOOD. POLLS
>>> ==>HILLARY COULD DO THE SAME
>>>
>>> True.
>>>
>>> But I have to point out that the Repugs' assault on
>>> the Democratic president -- and the truth -- didn't
>>> "bring down" Clinton. He finished out his second
>>> term and remains one of the most popular men
>>> in America today.
>>>
>>> Yours for accuracy in reporting. . . .
>>
>> It appears that you two were still committed to a mental
>> institution back in November 2004, when this thread was originally
>> posted, and thus, you could not respond. I am glad your condition
>> has improved. Please remember to take your meds.
>
> TYPICAL DIRT BAG REPUBLI CON [censored]

It's times like this that it's nice to bring up...WHO WON THE
ELECTION.

HOWEVER, GOOBER BUSH'S FIRST TERM WAS A SELECTION, NOT ELECTION.
SECOND TERM WAS RIDDLED WITH OHIO IRREGULATIONS. BUSH WILL FOREVER
BE COMPRIMISED FOR ELECTION FRAUD AND ROVE'S SCAMS AND EVIL WITH THE
"PAID" [censored] BOAT LIARS [censored] BY MEN WHO NEVER KNEW HIM OR SERVED
WITH HIM. REPUBLI CON CORRUPTION AT IT'S BEST

Quoted message said:

It's nice to see you demoncrats throwing fits. Makes me feel warm
and fuzzy inside.
--
-Larry

Type louder, I can't hear you.
--
-Larry

NO PROBLEM LARRY, HAPPY TO HELP A REPUBLI CON [censored] FACE SCUM BAG, "CAN YOU
HEAR ME NOW PIG BOY FROM THE RIGHTWING NUT PIGS

Quoted message said:

CHUCK MARTIN said:

"Larry Hodges" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

CHUCK MARTIN said:

"Larry Hodges" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> CHUCK MARTIN wrote:
>> "JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
>> news:[email hidden]...
>>> Ivan Gowch <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 15:57:47 GMT, "CHUCK MARTIN"
>>>> <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>> ==>"vonroach" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>> ==>> On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 21:57:04 -0500, John M. Williams
>>>> ==>> <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>> ==>>
>>>> ==>>>Actually, I think it was Bill Clinton who was sued for
>>>> shoving his ==>>>[censored] in someone's face.
>>>> ==>>>
>>>> ==>>>HTH
>>>> ==>> And lying under oath, just two of his lesser crimes in
>>>> office. ==>
>>>> ==>YEAH, CONSENTUAL, ADULT, LEGAL AND MUTUALLY AGREED UPON SEX.
>>>> BUT THE REPUBLI
>>>> ==>CON SCUM BNAGS USED IT TO BRING DOWN A POPULAR PRESIDENT. FACT IS
>>>> THAT IF
>>>> ==>CLINTON WERE TO RUN TODAY HE'D BEAT GOOBER BUSH'S DUNCE ASS
>>>> BUT GOOD. POLLS
>>>> ==>HILLARY COULD DO THE SAME
>>>>
>>>> True.
>>>>
>>>> But I have to point out that the Repugs' assault on
>>>> the Democratic president -- and the truth -- didn't
>>>> "bring down" Clinton. He finished out his second
>>>> term and remains one of the most popular men
>>>> in America today.
>>>>
>>>> Yours for accuracy in reporting. . . .
>>>
>>> It appears that you two were still committed to a mental
>>> institution back in November 2004, when this thread was
>>> originally posted, and thus, you could not respond. I am glad
>>> your condition has improved. Please remember to take your meds.
>>
>> TYPICAL DIRT BAG REPUBLI CON [censored]
>
> It's times like this that it's nice to bring up...WHO WON THE
> ELECTION.

HOWEVER, GOOBER BUSH'S FIRST TERM WAS A SELECTION, NOT ELECTION.
SECOND TERM WAS RIDDLED WITH OHIO IRREGULATIONS. BUSH WILL FOREVER
BE COMPRIMISED FOR ELECTION FRAUD AND ROVE'S SCAMS AND EVIL WITH THE
"PAID" [censored] BOAT LIARS [censored] BY MEN WHO NEVER KNEW HIM OR SERVED
WITH HIM. REPUBLI CON CORRUPTION AT IT'S BEST
> It's nice to see you demoncrats throwing fits. Makes me feel warm
> and fuzzy inside.
> --
> -Larry

Type louder, I can't hear you.
--
-Larry

NO PROBLEM LARRY, HAPPY TO HELP A REPUBLI CON [censored] FACE SCUM BAG, "CAN YOU
HEAR ME NOW PIG BOY FROM THE RIGHTWING NUT PIGS

Did you happen to look up NAZI? Of course you didn't. Those that are
liberally challenged have it hard I know. It stands for the National
Socialist German Workers' Party. You did catch the word "Socialist" in
there? That's what you are NAZI boy. I would say that the Nazis are just
an extreme version of you. But the more you talk, the more I see they are
not that much more extreme than you are. Keep up the good work! It's
people like you that help out the republican party. Carry on.

And just to make the point again...WE WON THE ELECTION. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
--
-Larry

Larry Hodges said:

CHUCK MARTIN wrote:

Did you happen to look up NAZI? Of course you didn't. Those that are
liberally challenged have it hard I know. It stands for the National
Socialist German Workers' Party. You did catch the word "Socialist"
in there? That's what you are NAZI boy. I would say that the Nazis
are just an extreme version of you. But the more you talk, the more
I see they are not that much more extreme than you are. Keep up the
good work! It's people like you that help out the republican party. Carry
on.
And just to make the point again...WE WON THE ELECTION.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Same old Bush,Jr like distortion of fact.
You don't even believe what you wrote

Sid9 said:

Larry Hodges said:

CHUCK MARTIN wrote:

Did you happen to look up NAZI? Of course you didn't. Those that
are liberally challenged have it hard I know. It stands for the
National Socialist German Workers' Party. You did catch the word
"Socialist" in there? That's what you are NAZI boy. I would say that
the Nazis
are just an extreme version of you. But the more you talk, the more
I see they are not that much more extreme than you are. Keep up the
good work! It's people like you that help out the republican party.
Carry on.
And just to make the point again...WE WON THE ELECTION.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Same old Bush,Jr like distortion of fact.
You don't even believe what you wrote

No it's not, and yes I do. Are you saying the Nazis weren't radical
Socialists? I'm waiting for this one. I can't wait to be educated by your
wisdom and knowledge.
--
-Larry

CHUCK MARTIN said:

"vonroach" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

John M. Williams said:

Actually, I think it was Bill Clinton who was sued for shoving his
[censored] in someone's face.

HTH

And lying under oath, just two of his lesser crimes in office.

YEAH, CONSENTUAL, ADULT, LEGAL AND MUTUALLY AGREED UPON SEX. BUT THE REPUBLI
CON SCUM BNAGS USED IT TO BRING DOWN A POPULAR PRESIDENT. FACT IS THAT IF
CLINTON WERE TO RUN TODAY HE'D BEAT GOOBER BUSH'S DUNCE ASS BUT GOOD. POLLS
HILLARY COULD DO THE SAME

Legal? When did adultery become legal?

"Larry Hodges" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

CHUCK MARTIN said:

"Larry Hodges" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

CHUCK MARTIN wrote:
> "Larry Hodges" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
> news:[email hidden]...
>> CHUCK MARTIN wrote:
>>> "JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email hidden]...
>>>> Ivan Gowch <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 15:57:47 GMT, "CHUCK MARTIN"
>>>>> <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>>> ==>"vonroach" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>>> ==>> On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 21:57:04 -0500, John M. Williams
>>>>> ==>> <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>>> ==>>
>>>>> ==>>>Actually, I think it was Bill Clinton who was sued for
>>>>> shoving his ==>>>[censored] in someone's face.
>>>>> ==>>>
>>>>> ==>>>HTH
>>>>> ==>> And lying under oath, just two of his lesser crimes in
>>>>> office. ==>
>>>>> ==>YEAH, CONSENTUAL, ADULT, LEGAL AND MUTUALLY AGREED UPON SEX.
>>>>> BUT THE REPUBLI
>>>>> ==>CON SCUM BNAGS USED IT TO BRING DOWN A POPULAR PRESIDENT. FACT
>>>>> IS THAT IF
>>>>> ==>CLINTON WERE TO RUN TODAY HE'D BEAT GOOBER BUSH'S DUNCE ASS
>>>>> BUT GOOD. POLLS
>>>>> ==>HILLARY COULD DO THE SAME
>>>>>
>>>>> True.
>>>>>
>>>>> But I have to point out that the Repugs' assault on
>>>>> the Democratic president -- and the truth -- didn't
>>>>> "bring down" Clinton. He finished out his second
>>>>> term and remains one of the most popular men
>>>>> in America today.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yours for accuracy in reporting. . . .
>>>>
>>>> It appears that you two were still committed to a mental
>>>> institution back in November 2004, when this thread was
>>>> originally posted, and thus, you could not respond. I am glad
>>>> your condition has improved. Please remember to take your meds.
>>>
>>> TYPICAL DIRT BAG REPUBLI CON [censored]
>>
>> It's times like this that it's nice to bring up...WHO WON THE
>> ELECTION.
>
> HOWEVER, GOOBER BUSH'S FIRST TERM WAS A SELECTION, NOT ELECTION.
> SECOND TERM WAS RIDDLED WITH OHIO IRREGULATIONS. BUSH WILL FOREVER
> BE COMPRIMISED FOR ELECTION FRAUD AND ROVE'S SCAMS AND EVIL WITH THE
> "PAID" [censored] BOAT LIARS [censored] BY MEN WHO NEVER KNEW HIM OR SERVED
> WITH HIM. REPUBLI CON CORRUPTION AT IT'S BEST
>> It's nice to see you demoncrats throwing fits. Makes me feel warm
>> and fuzzy inside.
>> --
>> -Larry

Type louder, I can't hear you.
--
-Larry

NO PROBLEM LARRY, HAPPY TO HELP A REPUBLI CON [censored] FACE SCUM BAG, "CAN
YOU HEAR ME NOW PIG BOY FROM THE RIGHTWING NUT PIGS

Did you happen to look up NAZI? Of course you didn't. Those that are
liberally challenged have it hard I know. It stands for the National
Socialist German Workers' Party. You did catch the word "Socialist" in
there? That's what you are NAZI boy. I would say that the Nazis are just
an extreme version of you. But the more you talk, the more I see they are
not that much more extreme than you are. Keep up the good work! It's
people like you that help out the republican party. Carry on.

And just to make the point again...WE WON THE ELECTION.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
--
-Larry yes larry repuke i did the word socialist and it means "republi
"con" corporate welfare nazism. and you know whay larry repuke, it fits
your party to a tee. nazi republi con goosesteppers. religious rightard
whacko's.

and just to reiterate, bush is in the white house, but he still lost the
first election, he was selected and will forever carry that asterisk, and
the last election was riddled with irregularities. but i know how you nazi's
prefer to disreguard the truth, thats how nazi's do it.
heil goober

Quoted message said:

"Sid9" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Larry Hodges said:

CHUCK MARTIN wrote:

Did you happen to look up NAZI? Of course you didn't. Those that are
liberally challenged have it hard I know. It stands for the National
Socialist German Workers' Party. You did catch the word "Socialist"
in there? That's what you are NAZI boy. I would say that the Nazis
are just an extreme version of you. But the more you talk, the more
I see they are not that much more extreme than you are. Keep up the
good work! It's people like you that help out the republican party.
Carry on.
And just to make the point again...WE WON THE ELECTION.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Same old Bush,Jr like distortion of fact.
You don't even believe what you wrote
repuke rightie nazi's believe whatever druggo limpballs and acid ann and
hackhead hannity and o "lie" lly tell them to believe. repuks cant think
for themselves

"Larry Hodges" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Sid9 said:

Larry Hodges said:

CHUCK MARTIN wrote:

Did you happen to look up NAZI? Of course you didn't. Those that
are liberally challenged have it hard I know. It stands for the
National Socialist German Workers' Party. You did catch the word
"Socialist" in there? That's what you are NAZI boy. I would say that
the Nazis
are just an extreme version of you. But the more you talk, the more
I see they are not that much more extreme than you are. Keep up the
good work! It's people like you that help out the republican party.
Carry on.
And just to make the point again...WE WON THE ELECTION.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Same old Bush,Jr like distortion of fact.
You don't even believe what you wrote

No it's not, and yes I do. Are you saying the Nazis weren't radical
Socialists? I'm waiting for this one. I can't wait to be educated by
your wisdom and knowledge.
--
-Larry

first off [censored], on a serious note, the socialist as under [censored] is not
even close to the definition of socialism that you repuke scum try to equate
with america's democrats where you try to paint every democrat in love with
welfare and trtee hugging and baby killing. you repukes took the word to a
whole other level that doent resemble it by a long shot. now i realize that
as a filthy low life lying pig, you will find a way to deny the obviious.
have at it repuke. and go back to the "druggo limpballs show" he has some
new facts for you

Quoted message said:

"Daniel" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

CHUCK MARTIN said:

"vonroach" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 21:57:04 -0500, John M. Williams
<[email hidden]> wrote:

>Actually, I think it was Bill Clinton who was sued for shoving his
>[censored] in someone's face.
>
>HTH
And lying under oath, just two of his lesser crimes in office.

YEAH, CONSENTUAL, ADULT, LEGAL AND MUTUALLY AGREED UPON SEX. BUT THE
REPUBLI
CON SCUM BNAGS USED IT TO BRING DOWN A POPULAR PRESIDENT. FACT IS THAT
IF
CLINTON WERE TO RUN TODAY HE'D BEAT GOOBER BUSH'S DUNCE ASS BUT GOOD.
POLLS
HILLARY COULD DO THE SAME

Legal? When did adultery become legal?

since the beginning of law in america.adultery is only illegal in the eyes
of the republi con religious rightard whacko's, not in a court of law. got
it now low life. adultery is not a legal defined crime. adulttery is
commited daily by many many many republi cons and democrats daily. you filth
bags used it against a popular president that you had to slander and demean
because you couldnt win any other way. it was a carl rove masterpiece equal
to his recent "paid [censored] boat liars" [censored] where they were paid to lie
about a candidate that they never knew or served with. typical republi con
distortions and liesa. republi cons have mastered that arena

Quoted message said:

CHUCK MARTIN said:

"Larry Hodges" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Sid9 said:

Larry Hodges wrote:
> CHUCK MARTIN wrote:
>
>
> Did you happen to look up NAZI? Of course you didn't. Those that
> are liberally challenged have it hard I know. It stands for the
> National Socialist German Workers' Party. You did catch the word
> "Socialist" in there? That's what you are NAZI boy. I would say
> that the Nazis
> are just an extreme version of you. But the more you talk, the
> more I see they are not that much more extreme than you are. Keep
> up the good work! It's people like you that help out the
> republican party. Carry on.
> And just to make the point again...WE WON THE ELECTION.
> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Same old Bush,Jr like distortion of fact.
You don't even believe what you wrote

No it's not, and yes I do. Are you saying the Nazis weren't radical
Socialists? I'm waiting for this one. I can't wait to be educated
by your wisdom and knowledge.
--
-Larry

first off [censored], on a serious note, the socialist as under [censored]
is not even close to the definition of socialism that you repuke scum
try to equate with america's democrats where you try to paint every
democrat in love with welfare and trtee hugging and baby killing. you
repukes took the word to a whole other level that doent resemble it
by a long shot. now i realize that as a filthy low life lying pig,
you will find a way to deny the obviious. have at it repuke. and go
back to the "druggo limpballs show" he has some new facts for you

lol

First of all, I want to thank you. I now have a new name for those little
balls of [censored] and toilet paper on my butt hairs. They're CHUCK MARTINS! At
least they're environmentally friendly.

Second, I'm not painting the Demoncrats with anything other than what
they've painted themselves. They stand for income redistribution in every
form on every level. Their environmental policies are unreasonable (i.e..
no drilling for oil in ANWR). They view America as the evil ones in the war
against terror. Basically, Dingleberry...I mean Chuck...you guys suck ass.

Third, the modern Socialists (i.e.. current liberal Demoncrats) are very
much like the Nazis. They both stand for the State being the ultimate end,
not the people. The only difference between them is the Nazis used violence
and terror (very much like your ally Al Qaeda), and the modern [censored]
Socialists...such as yourself...have simply implemented [censored] Socialist
policy from office. For further reference, [censored] Socialists = SS. You
should be proud to be associated with an organization with their track
record.

Well, it's 10am, and time for me to go take a CHUCK and wipe my MARTIN. And
with any luck, I'll get all of you off my butt hair.
--
-Larry