I would not pay £150 for a second hand Ridgeback, regardless of condition. It wasn't a great bike when it was new, and bikes don't generally hold their value well. Offer half that, be prepared to pay £100 if it's really mint.
I would not pay £150 for a second hand Ridgeback, regardless of condition. It wasn't a great bike when it was new, and bikes don't generally hold their value well. Offer half that, be prepared to pay £100 if it's really mint.
Oh dear.
I'm sorry to hear it wasn't that good a bike. I'm told they were over £300 when new. Can you tell me what was wrong with them?
Thanks for the advice. I've read the page on your website, and it's very useful.
It's a good enough bike for local use. I'ved used a similiar spec Ridgeback for occasional commuting for the last few years (5 - 12 miles each way) 2 -3 thousand miles in total. Its not the lightest bike in its class but does the job. I would buy the Edinburgh Bikes Courier if I was buying new now. 150 would be high for a bike thats seen much use as parts will need replaced soon but for 100 it would do the job. If you replace it with something better in due course it could of course be kept as a cheapo for trips to shops etc. While at the bottom end of good bikes its still better than much of the rubbish sold by supermarkets etc. Iain
I would not pay £150 for a second hand Ridgeback, regardless of condition. It wasn't a great bike when it was new, and bikes don't generally hold their value well. Offer half that, be prepared to pay £100 if it's really mint.
I'm sorry to hear it wasn't that good a bike. I'm told they were over £300 when new. Can you tell me what was wrong with them?
Nothing greatly wrong. But when you look at what you can pick up second hand for £150, it's not worth it. For the same money you could pick up a really nice bike sort of ten or fifteen years old, which would be a much more enjoyable bike to ride and would carry on being a great bike for years. Bikes, if moderately well maintained, do not age the way cars do.
Check out these completed auctions to get the feel of prices really nice bikes go for:
Nothing greatly wrong. But when you look at what you can pick up second hand for £150, it's not worth it. For the same money you could pick up a really nice bike sort of ten or fifteen years old, which would be a much more enjoyable bike to ride and would carry on being a great bike for years. Bikes, if moderately well maintained, do not age the way cars do.
Check out these completed auctions to get the feel of prices really nice bikes go for:
Unfortunately, I can't see any way that I can differentiate between a 'nice' bike and any other.
Two fairly serious bikers I know have independantly recommended Ridgeback (neither are the seller of the one I'm thinking of buying), and I have actually had a go on one (a Supernova) and it seemed a beautiful bike. A million miles from the £199 mountain bike I use at the moment. (Other recommendation were Scot and Giant)
Another point is that bikes on ebay are all over the country, so I'd have to buy one without trying it. My cycling friends say that is very unwise because 'fit' is very important.