Australia and New Zealand · Public discussion

Innovative?

Started by Sean Kerslake · · Last activity · 6 posts · 666 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Australia and New Zealand
Published
3 June 2005
Last activity
5 June 2005
Original author
Sean Kerslake
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
666
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hi Guys,

    Have a look at the pictures at:
    http://www-staff.lboro.ac.uk/~cdspk/index.html

    This is one of my students projects which we are currently marking and
    having heavy debates about.

    Its looks are 'wowwing' my colleagues into giving it a very good mark and
    I'm being the spoil sport because having seen alot of bike designs from the
    last 100 plus years, I don't think it is that 'wow'.

    I think the student made the mistake of pushing the frame aesthetics and not
    the flat pack delivery, self assembly part of his brief.

    I was just wondering what people thought of it and if they had seen
    [specific] similiar designs which I could cite.

    Cheers for any feedback, Sean

    PS. Please go to the UK New Designers Exhibition web site and vote for the
    Moulton as a more significant iconic design than the iPod -
    http://www.newdesigners.com/

    Sean Kerslake
    Design and Tech
    Loughborough Uni
    UK

  2. Sean Kerslake said:

    Hi Guys,

    Have a look at the pictures at:
    http://www-staff.lboro.ac.uk/~cdspk/index.html

    This is one of my students projects which we are currently marking and
    having heavy debates about.

    Its looks are 'wowwing' my colleagues into giving it a very good mark and
    I'm being the spoil sport because having seen alot of bike designs from the
    last 100 plus years, I don't think it is that 'wow'.

    I think the student made the mistake of pushing the frame aesthetics and not
    the flat pack delivery, self assembly part of his brief.

    I was just wondering what people thought of it and if they had seen
    [specific] similiar designs which I could cite.

    Cheers for any feedback, Sean

    PS. Please go to the UK New Designers Exhibition web site and vote for the
    Moulton as a more significant iconic design than the iPod -
    http://www.newdesigners.com/

    Sean Kerslake
    Design and Tech
    Loughborough Uni
    UK

    Can you buy them from IKEA? Should appease the SS freaks around here ;-)

    --
    Brett"Gears were invented for a reason"S

  3. hey, anyone who can do this [censored] gets my thumbs up ! 😄

    being a commuter my eye is drawn to the arrangement holding the mudguard to the front fork.
    NOT BAD! altho i think it could be made simpler/easier/cheaper with just a simple split-pin arrangment so that you could retro fit it to 'normal' forks/bikes
    (better go and trademark that one 😄)

    i can only see the advantages of flat-packin a bike if its easily/commonly done all the time, not just for shipping. Why not simplify/slim it furthe and make one of them rear stays removable?

    And finally, what is it with industrial designers and bikes????
    i think its great but it amazes me how many folios i have seen involving a bike 😄

    keep em comin...

    F"royalties rock"Dutch

  4. "flyingdutch" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    hey, anyone who can do this [censored] gets my thumbs up ! 😄

    being a commuter my eye is drawn to the arrangement holding the
    mudguard to the front fork.
    NOT BAD! altho i think it could be made simpler/easier/cheaper with
    just a simple split-pin arrangment so that you could retro fit it to
    'normal' forks/bikes
    (better go and trademark that one 😄)

    i can only see the advantages of flat-packin a bike if its
    easily/commonly done all the time, not just for shipping. Why not
    simplify/slim it furthe and make one of them rear stays removable?

    And finally, what is it with industrial designers and bikes????
    i think its great but it amazes me how many folios i have seen
    involving a bike 😄

    keep em comin...

    F"royalties rock"Dutch

    --
    flyingdutch


    What's the rigidity like? It looks kinda wibbly to me, but then I'm not an
    engineer.

  5. Resound said:

    What's the rigidity like? It looks kinda wibbly to me, but then I'm not an
    engineer.

    Never mind the rigidity, the whole thing is suddenly going to get a lot
    less 'self-assemblable' when yon student figures out how to add freaking
    *brakes*.

    If one of the criteria for this exercise is that the end result should
    be usable, then this is an F, however pretty it looks.

  6. "John Stevenson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Resound said:

    What's the rigidity like? It looks kinda wibbly to me, but then I'm not
    an engineer.

    Never mind the rigidity, the whole thing is suddenly going to get a lot
    less 'self-assemblable' when yon student figures out how to add freaking
    *brakes*.

    If one of the criteria for this exercise is that the end result should be
    usable, then this is an F, however pretty it looks.

    Naah, it's a fixie, he's hardcore, right? Besides, how fast can you go
    pushing all of 60 gear inches? Especially when the BB deflects ½" to either
    side under load.

    We're not being very supportive here, are we?

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.