General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Tom Tom Go

Started by Rodders · · Last activity · 6 posts · 320 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
23 May 2005
Last activity
24 May 2005
Original author
Rodders
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
320
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. If anyone has a Tom Tom you can down load POI to 285 Munros from here.

    http://www.pocketgpsworld.com/tomtompoi.php

    Rodders

  2. The message <[email hidden]>
    from "Rodders" <[email hidden]> contains these words:

    Quoted message said:

    If anyone has a Tom Tom you can down load POI to 285 Munros from here.

    285? I hadn't noticed another seismic event.

    So is the SMC getting so short of funds again that they wheeling out the
    joker yet again? Have they no shame?

    --
    Roger Chapman so far this year 34 summits
    New - 15 (Marilyns 4, Sweats 1, Outlying Fells 10)
    Repeats - 19 (Marilyns 5, Sweats 10, Wainwrights 12, Outlying Fells 0)

  3. In article <[email hidden]>, Roger
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    The message <[email hidden]>
    from "Rodders" <[email hidden]> contains these words:

    Quoted message said:

    If anyone has a Tom Tom you can down load POI to 285 Munros from here.

    285? I hadn't noticed another seismic event.

    So is the SMC getting so short of funds again that they wheeling out the
    joker yet again? Have they no shame?

    :-)
    --
    Bill Grey
    http://www.billboy.co.uk

  4. In article <[email hidden]>, druidh
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:
    Roger said:

    The message <[email hidden]>
    from "Rodders" <[email hidden]> contains these words:

    Quoted message said:

    If anyone has a Tom Tom you can down load POI to 285 Munros from
    here.


    285? I hadn't noticed another seismic event.
    So is the SMC getting so short of funds again that they wheeling out
    the
    joker yet again? Have they no shame?

    Foinaven?? It's a stick-on for another Munro. The West cairn is
    definitly higher than the East (according to my Geko) and the East is
    given as 914M or 2999Ft.

    druidh

    Has anyone told Cameron McNeish ?
    --
    Bill Grey
    http://www.billboy.co.uk

  5. W. D. Grey said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, druidh
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Foinaven?? It's a stick-on for another Munro. The West cairn is
    definitly higher than the East (according to my Geko) and the East


    is

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    given as 914M or 2999Ft.

    druidh

    Has anyone told Cameron McNeish ?

    Any reason in particular? Given the lack of accuracy evident in his
    last "Munros" book, I'm amazed he didn't include it anyway.

    druidh

  6. On Mon, 23 May 2005 23:04:43 GMT, druidh <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Roger said:

    The message <[email hidden]>
    from "Rodders" <[email hidden]> contains these words:

    Quoted message said:

    If anyone has a Tom Tom you can down load POI to 285 Munros from here.

    285? I hadn't noticed another seismic event.

    So is the SMC getting so short of funds again that they wheeling out the
    joker yet again? Have they no shame?

    Foinaven?? It's a stick-on for another Munro. The West cairn is
    definitly higher than the East (according to my Geko) and the East is
    given as 914M or 2999Ft.

    Another nail in the coffin - I was up there a couple of years back
    and left my similar thoughts in TAC

    http://bubl.ac.uk/org/tacit/tac/tac58/itsthath.htm

    Richard Webb

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.