General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Spot Increasing

Started by Sanbar · · Last activity · 9 posts · 304 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
18 May 2005
Last activity
20 May 2005
Original author
Sanbar
Posts
9
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
304
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–9 of 9
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Would it be fair to say that bodybuilding is about spot increasing and
    overall reduction. Everyone talks about how you can't spot reduce, but
    obviously you can spot increase. When you have a tiny little waist and huge
    shoulders it basically started as a tiny waist and tiny shoulders.

  2. Quoted message said:

    When you have a tiny little waist and huge


    shoulders it basically started as a tiny waist and tiny shoulders.>

    No, not quite, not even close.

  3. Sanbar said:

    Would it be fair to say that bodybuilding
    is about spot increasing and overall
    reduction. Everyone talks about how you
    can't spot reduce, but obviously you can
    spot increase.

    I've never heard that expression, but, yes, you can obviously spot
    increase. And some would agree that that's exactly what bodybuilding is
    *to them*.

    I'd guess that most here have seen Mr. Pecs, Mr. Delts, and Mr. Arms
    being carried around by stick legs. Are those guys bodybuilders? Sure.
    They lift weights and they focus on bodyparts which appeal to them.
    Will they be contest winners? Doubtful.

    Quoted message said:

    When you have a tiny little waist and
    huge shoulders it basically started as
    a tiny waist and tiny shoulders.

    Not always. It's difficult to make a fool-proof generalization. I'd say
    that you're missing the mark.

    Another few words wrt spot increasing. I forget the author... maybe Don
    Ross, but there was an article WayBackWhen which suggested that
    bodybuilders take some time to attack their naturally strong bodyparts
    rather than concentrating on their weak points. I believe the idea was
    that many trainers spend so much time on lagging parts which often fail
    to show any true growth. The author's idea was to concentrate on the
    parts that were already genetically superior to really give them a
    boost. Sure, not the way to a balanced physique, but an interesting
    thought nonetheless.

    --
    Curt
    http://curtjames.com/

  4. "Curt James" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Sanbar said:

    Would it be fair to say that bodybuilding
    is about spot increasing and overall
    reduction. Everyone talks about how you
    can't spot reduce, but obviously you can
    spot increase.

    I've never heard that expression, but, yes, you can obviously spot
    increase. And some would agree that that's exactly what bodybuilding is
    *to them*.

    I'd guess that most here have seen Mr. Pecs, Mr. Delts, and Mr. Arms
    being carried around by stick legs. Are those guys bodybuilders? Sure.
    They lift weights and they focus on bodyparts which appeal to them.
    Will they be contest winners? Doubtful.

    Quoted message said:

    When you have a tiny little waist and
    huge shoulders it basically started as
    a tiny waist and tiny shoulders.

    Not always. It's difficult to make a fool-proof generalization. I'd say
    that you're missing the mark.

    Another few words wrt spot increasing. I forget the author... maybe Don
    Ross, but there was an article WayBackWhen which suggested that
    bodybuilders take some time to attack their naturally strong bodyparts
    rather than concentrating on their weak points. I believe the idea was
    that many trainers spend so much time on lagging parts which often fail
    to show any true growth. The author's idea was to concentrate on the
    parts that were already genetically superior to really give them a
    boost. Sure, not the way to a balanced physique, but an interesting
    thought nonetheless.

    --
    Curt
    http://curtjames.com/

    My point is that if you couldn't spot reduce and you couldn't spot increase
    there would be no sport of bodybuilding. You have to have an avenue to
    change the shape of your body and it's either one or the other. Without spot
    increasing you would have the opposite effect of spot reducing which would
    be increasing things such as your waistline.

  5. Sanbar said:

    My point is

    In error.

    Your point is incorrect.

    Your hypothesis is false.

    You are wrong.

    Well, so far as any connection between spot reduction and spot addition
    is concerned. One does not necessitate the other. No.

    Quoted message said:

    that if you couldn't spot reduce and
    you couldn't spot increase there would
    be no sport of bodybuilding. You have
    to have an avenue to change the shape
    of your body and it's either one or
    the other.

    And?

    Quoted message said:

    Without spot increasing you would have
    the opposite effect

    Or stasis.

    Quoted message said:

    of spot reducing which would be increasing
    things such as your waistline.

    BZZZT.

    Wrong. Or, at the very least, not necessarily.

    --
    Curt
    http://curtjames.com/

  6. Sanbar said:

    "Curt James" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Sanbar said:

    Would it be fair to say that bodybuilding
    is about spot increasing and overall
    reduction. Everyone talks about how you
    can't spot reduce, but obviously you can
    spot increase.

    I've never heard that expression, but, yes, you can obviously spot
    increase. And some would agree that that's exactly what bodybuilding is
    *to them*.

    I'd guess that most here have seen Mr. Pecs, Mr. Delts, and Mr. Arms
    being carried around by stick legs. Are those guys bodybuilders? Sure.
    They lift weights and they focus on bodyparts which appeal to them.
    Will they be contest winners? Doubtful.

    Quoted message said:

    When you have a tiny little waist and
    huge shoulders it basically started as
    a tiny waist and tiny shoulders.

    Not always. It's difficult to make a fool-proof generalization. I'd say
    that you're missing the mark.

    Another few words wrt spot increasing. I forget the author... maybe Don
    Ross, but there was an article WayBackWhen which suggested that
    bodybuilders take some time to attack their naturally strong bodyparts
    rather than concentrating on their weak points. I believe the idea was
    that many trainers spend so much time on lagging parts which often fail
    to show any true growth. The author's idea was to concentrate on the
    parts that were already genetically superior to really give them a
    boost. Sure, not the way to a balanced physique, but an interesting
    thought nonetheless.

    --
    Curt
    http://curtjames.com/

    My point is that if you couldn't spot reduce and you couldn't spot increase
    there would be no sport of bodybuilding. You have to have an avenue to
    change the shape of your body and it's either one or the other. Without spot
    increasing you would have the opposite effect of spot reducing which would
    be increasing things such as your waistline.


    You are clearly misunderstanding the idea behind spot reduction. Spot
    reduction relates to the reduction in fat in a specific area of the
    body, typically around the abs. It has nothing to do with muscles. We
    tell people not to spot reduce because you cannot simply reduce the fat
    in a specific area unless you have lypo done. Far too many newbies
    think they can do a bunch of ab exercises and they will eventually have
    a 6 pack. Fact is you can have the greatest ab routine for your body
    and still have nothing showing after several years unless the overall
    body fat has been reduced enough for the muscles to show through.

    --
    Ed
    http://everythingec.com/startingpoint

  7. On 18 May 2005 15:46:33 -0700, "Curt James" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Another few words wrt spot increasing. I forget the author... maybe Don
    Ross, but there was an article WayBackWhen which suggested that
    bodybuilders take some time to attack their naturally strong bodyparts
    rather than concentrating on their weak points. I believe the idea was
    that many trainers spend so much time on lagging parts which often fail
    to show any true growth. The author's idea was to concentrate on the
    parts that were already genetically superior to really give them a
    boost. Sure, not the way to a balanced physique, but an interesting
    thought nonetheless.

    Are you saying that I should try to focus on increasing my penis
    size.

    Which penis enlargement pills do you recommend?

  8. Curt James said:
    Sanbar said:

    My point is

    In error.

    Your point is incorrect.

    Your hypothesis is false.

    He's not hypothesising anything...he's day dreaming perhaps...he's
    philosophizing that *IF* A then B...his conclusions are correct IF A
    were true. But we know that A is false which render his conclusions
    worthless.

  9. Nameless wrote:

    re a balanced physique

    Quoted message said:

    Are you saying that I should try to focus on
    increasing my penis size.

    Years ago, at least one comedian had a bodybuilding reference in his
    routine. Something like, "They're making all the other bodyparts huge,
    but that makes the really important bodypart look even tinier by
    comparison."

    And I think it was Emo Phillips, a rail-thin comic, who would open his
    act with, "I'm sorry I'm late. I was bodybuilding."

    Quoted message said:

    Which penis enlargement pills do you recommend?

    Nah. No pills necessary, Nameless. Some strong rope, a 45-pound Olympic
    plate, and a bridge will do you. Tie one end to your schwantz and the
    other end to the plate then pitch the 45er off the bridge. That or
    wasps in your pants. Either should do the trick.

    Hth.

    --
    Curt
    http://curtjames.com/

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.