Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Re: Non-invasive Pressure Gauge?

Started by Eric · · Last activity · 7 posts · 421 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
8 May 2005
Last activity
9 May 2005
Original author
Eric
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
421
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I don't think that's the case. When I inflate a tire, I see a dramatic
    increase in pressure on the downstroke, then I usually hear/feel a
    click, and the pressure stabilizes. I'm assuming that is the presta
    valve opening to let the air in the tire. When the pressure is greater
    on the tire side, it closes. That air rush is just left over air in the
    pump.

    Now, I think schrader valves are a little different, because the
    inflator has a little pin that pushes the valve open. When you remove
    the inflator, there is a lag that can let some air out. This is really
    noticable with the screw-on inflators.

    Eric

  2. still a gauge that doesn;t use the valve would be cool.

    wle.

  3. wle said:

    still a gauge that doesn;t use the valve would be cool.

    wle.

    What problem does that solve? Before every ride I check the tire
    pressure by letting out some air, and inflate it to the desired
    pressure. It is a routine, like putting on your cycling shoes and
    filling your water bottles.
    Checking the pressure with a gauge that doesn't use the stem, conclude
    that the pressure is not OK and then inflate the tire with a pump with a
    gauge sounds silly to me.
    If you want to get used to this routine try latex tubes ;-)

    Lou
    --
    Posted by news://news.nb.nu

  4. it solves the problem of doing all that.

    if the pressure is ok, why go through all that?

    wle.

  5. wle said:

    it solves the problem of doing all that.

    if the pressure is ok, why go through all that?

    wle.

    Through all that? It costs 30 seconds.
    Boy, you must be on a tied schedule.
    I think the thumb method will be as accurate as an external and indirect
    pressure gauge. And much cheaper.

    Lou
    --
    Posted by news://news.nb.nu

  6. difference of opinion.

    that is why i want the gadget and you are happy
    with your routine.

    wle.

  7. Lou Holtman May 8, 1:08 pm show options

    Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
    From: Lou Holtman <[email hidden]> - Find messages by this
    author
    Date: Sun, 08 May 2005 19:08:13 +0200
    Local: Sun,May 8 2005 1:08 pm
    Subject: Re: Non-invasive Pressure Gauge?
    Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
    original | Report Abuse

    wle said:

    it solves the problem of doing all that.

    Quoted message said:

    if the pressure is ok, why go through all that?

    Quoted message said:

    wle.

    Maybe its just me, but my tires loose a bit of pressure everyday, so I
    always have to add some air with the pump anyway. I don't think the
    non-invasive pressure tester saves anything, and actually costs time. I
    attach the pump and add air, you non-invasively check the pressure,
    then attach the pump and add air--unless, of course, you are not
    concerned with having your tires properly inflated and are willing to
    ride with a pressure deficit that is within your tolerance, say
    10-15lbs psi.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.