General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: Pool depth

Started by King Frog · · Last activity · 2 posts · 473 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
30 April 2005
Last activity
30 April 2005
Original author
King Frog
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
473
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. "Man o' Tea" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Some time ago, I recall there was a post to the effect that, because of
    insurance concerns, new pools are being built without deep ends for
    diving. My pool consultant, however, claims that this can't be true
    because new pools need deep ends for lifesaving training.

    I wonder if any of you have heard about new pools being built deep or
    shallow?


    There is some truth in it about the insurance concerns. Originally, elite
    55m competition pools were being built with a 'deep' (about 6' or 2m) even
    depth to accommodate major water polo events. Soon, elite swimmers started
    to think that they were swimming faster in a deep pool and a theory was
    developed that vertical downward 'waves' created by the swimmer would not
    bounce back as they do in a shallow pool, impeding the swimmer's
    performance. Nowadays, you are unlikely to see an elite swimming comp. in
    anything but a pool with a minimum 2m depth.

    Next came the awareness of many injuries occurring in pools with starting
    blocks at shallow ends of the pool. Much of the statistics passed around
    by the insurance industry was questionable (as they often included injuries
    from elsewhere such as kids jumping off jetties etc.) but nevertheless, a
    scale of desirable water depths compared with the height of diving blocks
    was established. Allowing swimmers to dive into a pool that does not meet
    those standards could now be considered as irresponsible or in insurance
    terms - negligent. The irony is that very, very few injuries have occurred
    to swimmers doing a dive start. Out of the hundreds of thousands of dive
    starts over the decades - is that a problem? Many injuries off starting
    blocks have occurred though - from the kids playing around, doing bombs etc.
    during public sessions.

    Another irony of the 'shallow' pool was that it became 'fashionable' for
    swimmers to do a jack-knife dive start, that is they get more height from
    the block to be able to dive into a small hole - the feet following the body
    into the same 'hole' created by the hands. To avoid scraping the bottom of
    the pool, swimmers then had to flatten out rapidly which some started to
    believe it might cause damage to the spine over a period of time. I
    understand that some studies supported this perception but the good news is
    that jack-knife 'fashion' has now faded out in favour of a flatter entry.

    KF

  2. King Frog said:

    There is some truth in it about
    the insurance concerns.

    Are insurance concerns discouraging deep areas for diving boards?

    BTW, I'd recommend that you, meaning anyone reading this, verify that
    your or your children's facility is actually being inspected and
    passing those inspections. I've been shocked at what I've found.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.