Australia and New Zealand · Public discussion

CSV's Latest 'decree'

Started by Hitchy · · Last activity · 22 posts · 1,730 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Australia and New Zealand
Published
22 April 2005
Last activity
29 April 2005
Original author
Hitchy
Posts
22
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,730
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 22
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. G'day all,

    any of you with a racing licence had a chance to digest CSV's latest 'pronouncement from the mount'....concerning racing?. It's posted on the CSV website in the 'news' section. For those that can't be bothered reading it, it basically concerns who will be able to race where. Apparently the ideaology that the holder of a CSV licence can race 'anywhere' (in a sanctioned race), is no more. From my reading of it, ALL races will be divided into 1 of 3 catorgaries. 1/ A club race, meaning ONLY members of the host club may race. 2/ A 'combine' race, where only members of up to 10, 'preordained' clubs may race. 3/ An 'open', where anyone may race......what does this mean?...well the likelihood is, for example, that the popular crit races hosted at Kew, Glenvale Cres & Stkilda, will be limited to being either a club race or a combine event. If they are a 'combine' event, the clubs (up to 10) have to be 'pre nominated' & the host club will be restricted to accepting entries from members of these clubs......All well & fine if your club happens to be a member of the 'combine'. Members of the larger metro clubs shouldn't have a problem, but what of the smaller clubs & country clubs. Neither of these are likely to be 'nominated' due to sheer lack of numbers, meaning that these members will be restricted to racing club events & opens. Most smaller clubs, simply by virtue of their size find it difficult to run regular 'club' events, thus any members who choose to race, will be forced to join a larger club that has access to 'combine' racing. The end result will be the loss of country & smaller clubs as their members 'migrate' to holding licences with larger clubs....Those conspiracy theorists amongest us may well believe that this is CSV's intent!. Whatever, this latest offering from CSV will do nothing for the sport of cycle racing. I urge all club members to register their protest to CSV at this blatantly ludicrous ruling....

    Hitchy

  2. Hitchy said:

    any of you with a racing licence had a chance to digest CSV's latest
    'pronouncement from the mount'....concerning racing?. It's posted on
    the CSV website in the 'news' section. For those that can't be bothered
    reading it, it basically concerns who will be able to race where.
    Apparently the ideaology that the holder of a CSV licence can race
    'anywhere' (in a sanctioned race), is no more. From my reading of it,
    ALL races will be divided into 1 of 3 catorgaries. 1/ A club race,
    meaning ONLY members of the host club may race. 2/ A 'combine' race,
    where only members of up to 10, 'preordained' clubs may race. 3/ An
    'open', where anyone may race......what does this mean?...well the
    likelihood is, for example, that the popular crit races hosted at Kew,
    Glenvale Cres & Stkilda, will be limited to being either a club race or
    a combine event. If they are a 'combine' event, the clubs (up to 10)
    have to be 'pre nominated' & the host club will be restricted to
    accepting entries from members of these clubs......All well & fine if
    your club happens to be a member of the 'combine'. Members of the
    larger metro clubs shouldn't have a problem, but what of the smaller
    clubs & country clubs. Neither of these are likely to be 'nominated'
    due to sheer lack of numbers, meaning that these members will be
    restricted to racing club events & opens. Most smaller clubs, simply by
    virtue of their size find it difficult to run regular 'club' events,
    thus any members who choose to race, will be forced to join a larger
    club that has access to 'combine' racing. The end result will be the
    loss of country & smaller clubs as their members 'migrate' to holding
    licences with larger clubs....Those conspiracy theorists amongest us
    may well believe that this is CSV's intent!. Whatever, this latest
    offering from CSV will do nothing for the sport of cycle racing. I urge
    all club members to register their protest to CSV at this blatantly
    ludicrous ruling....

    I don't think any of the clubs would actually pay attention to that kind
    of rule. If I rock up at Glenvale and flash a licence, they don't care
    where I'm from - just so long as I have a current licence. Do you really
    think any club would turn away a paying licenced rider?
    No idea what they are changing the rules and what they hope to achieve.

    hippy

  3. Sounds like an extension of that idiotic email they sent out saying NOBODY could compete in that 2-race thingy in Bright a few weeks' back!

    Fired off an email asking if they could tell me what is hould have on my toast and what to wear the next day, as obviously they feel they own my [censored] now 🙄

    PS whereTF have you been Hitch-meister???
    Months ago you were naggin me to race and now, here i type, a winner 😄

    F"...heroes, but just for one day"Dutch

  4. flyingdutch said:

    Sounds like an extension of that idiotic email they sent out saying NOBODY could compete in that 2-race thingy in Bright a few weeks' back!

    Fired off an email asking if they could tell me what is hould have on my toast and what to wear the next day, as obviously they feel they own my [censored] now 🙄

    PS whereTF have you been Hitch-meister???
    Months ago you were naggin me to race and now, here i type, a winner 😄

    F"...heroes, but just for one day"Dutch

    Hope you blokes are right....it's gunna be a dark day for road racing in this state if they try & enforce it. Its having an effect already, I know of a few blokes that regularly have taken part in the 'bendigo tour'......only this year we've been told unless you're a member of one of the clubs nominated as in Bendigo's 'combine', you're not allowed to compete.....sucks bigtime....whens the next CSV election...these peckerheads have gotta go!........So you bit the bullet & started racing....WOOHOO....kew crits?....grade?....you gunna do 'road' this year?. Hawthorn is a member of the Northern Combine....some good racing to be had every Saturdee arvo from next weekend......

    hitchy

  5. Hitchy said:

    Hope you blokes are right....it's gunna be a dark day for road racing in this state if they try & enforce it. Its having an effect already, I know of a few blokes that regularly have taken part in the 'bendigo tour'......only this year we've been told unless you're a member of one of the clubs nominated as in Bendigo's 'combine', you're not allowed to compete.....sucks bigtime....whens the next CSV election...these peckerheads have gotta go!........So you bit the bullet & started racing....WOOHOO....kew crits?....grade?....you gunna do 'road' this year?. Hawthorn is a member of the Northern Combine....some good racing to be had every Saturdee arvo from next weekend......

    hitchy

    yeah N/combine ones. might just go along and get a taste (and no doubt a whoopin 🙄 )
    Did Kew crits, got a fourth, went to StK got 3 3rds, then to Glenvale for a 3rd n a 1st 😄
    Up in Cgrade to help out the Hip, and learn some hurt 🙁

  6. "Hitchy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    G'day all,

    any of you with a racing licence had a chance to digest CSV's latest
    'pronouncement from the mount'....concerning racing?. It's posted on
    the CSV website in the 'news' section. For those that can't be bothered
    reading it, it basically concerns who will be able to race where.
    Apparently the ideaology that the holder of a CSV licence can race
    'anywhere' (in a sanctioned race), is no more. From my reading of it,
    ALL races will be divided into 1 of 3 catorgaries. 1/ A club race,
    meaning ONLY members of the host club may race. 2/ A 'combine' race,
    where only members of up to 10, 'preordained' clubs may race. 3/ An
    'open', where anyone may race......what does this mean?...well the
    likelihood is, for example, that the popular crit races hosted at Kew,
    Glenvale Cres & Stkilda, will be limited to being either a club race or
    a combine event. If they are a 'combine' event, the clubs (up to 10)
    have to be 'pre nominated' & the host club will be restricted to
    accepting entries from members of these clubs......All well & fine if
    your club happens to be a member of the 'combine'. Members of the
    larger metro clubs shouldn't have a problem, but what of the smaller
    clubs & country clubs. Neither of these are likely to be 'nominated'
    due to sheer lack of numbers, meaning that these members will be
    restricted to racing club events & opens. Most smaller clubs, simply by
    virtue of their size find it difficult to run regular 'club' events,
    thus any members who choose to race, will be forced to join a larger
    club that has access to 'combine' racing. The end result will be the
    loss of country & smaller clubs as their members 'migrate' to holding
    licences with larger clubs....Those conspiracy theorists amongest us
    may well believe that this is CSV's intent!. Whatever, this latest
    offering from CSV will do nothing for the sport of cycle racing. I urge
    all club members to register their protest to CSV at this blatantly
    ludicrous ruling....

    Hitchy

    --
    Hitchy


    I've had a read of Mr Ciavola's memo that dictates the new policy for cycle
    racing in Vic. Below is my email response to his attempt to kill off
    cycling in Victoria. As Hitchy has already said "I urge all club members to
    register their protest to CSV"

    Geoff
    - not really feeling too inclined to race under this regime anymore if this
    is what it's come to.
    ------
    Dear Joe,

    I've just read your new policy re cycle racing in Victoria and I'm
    gobsmacked and really at a loss to see how it helps promote participation in
    the sport.

    How does excluding people from events increase participation? To me all this
    policy will do is decrease the number of club events, decrease the number of
    clubs, decrease the number of riders in the sport and ultimately kill the
    sport. Why would you want to do that?
    Your draconian policy will mean the death of the smaller clubs as what club
    in their right mind would "invite" a club with a small membership base to
    their combine race. Ultimately the lack of racing options for the riders of
    these clubs will lead to these riders leaving that club for another or just
    giving up the sport altogether meaning the end for many non metro area clubs
    and a few metro clubs as well.

    What is the policy regarding riders visiting from interstate? I thought
    having an ACF licence allowed you to support any club, combine or open event
    no matter what part of Australia you came from or went to. This new policy
    of yours effectively excludes visiting interstate riders from racing in any
    Victorian event other than an open.

    How does this affect the members of the ADF cycling club that are posted to
    Victoria? These guys (men and women who serve our country) will never be
    included in combine or club racing under the format you have imposed because
    they don't belong to a Victorian club.

    CSV should exist for the benefit of the sport in Victoria. It should not be
    out to kill the sport at the grass roots level.
    This truly is a sad time for cycling in Victoria.

    I and many others look forward to your reply on this matter.
    -----------

  7. "hippy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Hitchy said:

    any of you with a racing licence had a chance to digest CSV's latest
    'pronouncement from the mount'....concerning racing?. It's posted on
    the CSV website in the 'news' section. For those that can't be bothered
    reading it, it basically concerns who will be able to race where.
    Apparently the ideaology that the holder of a CSV licence can race
    'anywhere' (in a sanctioned race), is no more. From my reading of it,
    ALL races will be divided into 1 of 3 catorgaries. 1/ A club race,
    meaning ONLY members of the host club may race. 2/ A 'combine' race,
    where only members of up to 10, 'preordained' clubs may race. 3/ An
    'open', where anyone may race......what does this mean?...well the
    likelihood is, for example, that the popular crit races hosted at Kew,
    Glenvale Cres & Stkilda, will be limited to being either a club race or
    a combine event. If they are a 'combine' event, the clubs (up to 10)
    have to be 'pre nominated' & the host club will be restricted to
    accepting entries from members of these clubs......All well & fine if
    your club happens to be a member of the 'combine'. Members of the
    larger metro clubs shouldn't have a problem, but what of the smaller
    clubs & country clubs. Neither of these are likely to be 'nominated' due
    to sheer lack of numbers, meaning that these members will be
    restricted to racing club events & opens. Most smaller clubs, simply by
    virtue of their size find it difficult to run regular 'club' events,
    thus any members who choose to race, will be forced to join a larger
    club that has access to 'combine' racing. The end result will be the
    loss of country & smaller clubs as their members 'migrate' to holding
    licences with larger clubs....Those conspiracy theorists amongest us
    may well believe that this is CSV's intent!. Whatever, this latest
    offering from CSV will do nothing for the sport of cycle racing. I urge
    all club members to register their protest to CSV at this blatantly
    ludicrous ruling....

    I don't think any of the clubs would actually pay attention to that kind
    of rule. If I rock up at Glenvale and flash a licence, they don't care
    where I'm from - just so long as I have a current licence. Do you really
    think any club would turn away a paying licenced rider?
    No idea what they are changing the rules and what they hope to achieve.

    hippy

    The memo says clubs will be obliged to submit entry lists to CSV for their
    Club events so I'm sure part of this will include a record of licence
    numbers/names of all competitors. This being the case I would assume CSV
    would impose heavy penalties on any club that welcomed a member of another
    club to their racing. This is truly a sad day for cycling in Australia.

    Geoff

  8. "Hitchy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    G'day all,

    any of you with a racing licence had a chance to digest CSV's latest
    'pronouncement from the mount'....concerning racing?.

    Strange move, here in SA the 'combines' were dispatched 2 or 3 years ago
    because it was killing off one half of Adelaide's clubs (there was a north
    and a south combine). The only good I could see in that old rule wasthat it
    forced me to try track (as I couldn't do the crit racing I wanted to back
    then!)

    Last week the 'boundary rule' was also removed here in SA. So for those of
    you in Adelaide who didn't like the idea of joining cycling because you
    didn't want to have to join the club in your 'area' and would rather choose
    yourself which club to join based upon what's on offer - well, now's your
    chance! (or, get some mates together and form your own club - there's
    nothing stopping you now!)

    Cheers
    Gemma

  9. So if I come over from Tassie with my trusty steed, I won't be able to race? Looks like I'll have to bring my golf clubs instead. At least in that sport I am welcome on any course in the country. If this ruling is an "insurance excuse" then at least let everyone know. Any sort of reasoning would be better than none!

    I've been in sports administration myself and I'm always amazed to come across people who want to make up petty rules that kill off the sport they are professing to help. Luckily I've been in a position to get rid of some of these luddites. I suggest you Victorians get off your bikes, get enough CSV members together to call an Extraordinary General Meeting to get this ruling overturned (or even throw out the idiots who came up with it).

  10. Hitchy said:


    G'day all,

    any of you with a racing licence had a chance to digest CSV's latest
    'pronouncement from the mount'....concerning racing?.

    My bet is it's to do with insurance. Combine events are defacto
    opens to a certain extent, but without the extra insurance
    requirements etc. Perhaps they realised that if something
    happened and someone got hurt that they'd be rooted?

    It sucks, but anything to do with insurance sucks. Insurance
    is the essence of evil in the modern world.

  11. Carl Brewer said:


    My bet is it's to do with insurance. Combine events are defacto
    opens to a certain extent, but without the extra insurance
    requirements etc. Perhaps they realised that if something
    happened and someone got hurt that they'd be rooted?

    It sucks, but anything to do with insurance sucks. Insurance
    is the essence of evil in the modern world.

    'insurance'.

    never seen that spelling of 'hills' before 😄

    or is it 'puncture' ?

  12. This is a load of [censored]! Our club regualry allows memebers from other clubs
    to compete in out weekly club level races. Now in order to do that, we have
    to have an approved combine event? For crits like Sandown and Glenvale, I
    am sure more than 10 clubs are represented!!!

    Grrrrr

    "flyingdutch" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Carl Brewer said:


    My bet is it's to do with insurance. Combine events are defacto
    opens to a certain extent, but without the extra insurance
    requirements etc. Perhaps they realised that if something
    happened and someone got hurt that they'd be rooted?

    It sucks, but anything to do with insurance sucks. Insurance
    is the essence of evil in the modern world.

    'insurance'.

    never seen that spelling of 'hills' before 😄

    or is it 'puncture' ?

    --
    flyingdutch

  13. On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 20:19:30 +1000, "The P" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    This is a load of [censored]! Our club regualry allows memebers from other clubs
    to compete in out weekly club level races. Now in order to do that, we have
    to have an approved combine event? For crits like Sandown and Glenvale, I
    am sure more than 10 clubs are represented!!!

    Write and/or call CSV and complain. If enough people do, maybe
    they'll get the hint. I've done so ...

  14. Hitchy said:

    G'day all,

    any of you with a racing licence had a chance to digest CSV's latest 'pronouncement from the mount'....concerning racing?. It's posted on the CSV website in the 'news' section. For those that can't be bothered reading it, it basically concerns who will be able to race where. Apparently the ideaology that the holder of a CSV licence can race 'anywhere' (in a sanctioned race), is no more. From my reading of it, ALL races will be divided into 1 of 3 catorgaries. 1/ A club race, meaning ONLY members of the host club may race. 2/ A 'combine' race, where only members of up to 10, 'preordained' clubs may race. 3/ An 'open', where anyone may race......what does this mean?...well the likelihood is, for example, that the popular crit races hosted at Kew, Glenvale Cres & Stkilda, will be limited to being either a club race or a combine event. If they are a 'combine' event, the clubs (up to 10) have to be 'pre nominated' & the host club will be restricted to accepting entries from members of these clubs......All well & fine if your club happens to be a member of the 'combine'. Members of the larger metro clubs shouldn't have a problem, but what of the smaller clubs & country clubs. Neither of these are likely to be 'nominated' due to sheer lack of numbers, meaning that these members will be restricted to racing club events & opens. Most smaller clubs, simply by virtue of their size find it difficult to run regular 'club' events, thus any members who choose to race, will be forced to join a larger club that has access to 'combine' racing. The end result will be the loss of country & smaller clubs as their members 'migrate' to holding licences with larger clubs....Those conspiracy theorists amongest us may well believe that this is CSV's intent!. Whatever, this latest offering from CSV will do nothing for the sport of cycle racing. I urge all club members to register their protest to CSV at this blatantly ludicrous ruling....

    Hitchy

    as a female racer based in a regional/rural area (ie member of country club) it's a double whammy for the likes of me - female racing is extremely limited as it is, this just furthers limits any opportunities for racing full stop. I am still waiting for notification of who the new committee is - after all that spam to get us to vote for all parties concerned, who the h3ll are they?????

  15. warrwych said:
    Quoted message said:

    as a female racer based in a regional/rural area (ie member of country
    club) it's a double whammy for the likes of me - female racing is
    extremely limited as it is, this just furthers limits any
    opportunities for racing full stop. I am still waiting for notification
    of who the new committee is - after all that spam to get us to vote for
    all parties concerned, who the h3ll are they?????

    Write to CVS and complain!

  16. Carl Brewer said:
    warrwych said:

    as a female racer based in a regional/rural area (ie member of country
    club) it's a double whammy for the likes of me - female racing is
    extremely limited as it is, this just furthers limits any
    opportunities for racing full stop. I am still waiting for notification
    of who the new committee is - after all that spam to get us to vote for
    all parties concerned, who the h3ll are they?????

    Write to CVS and complain!

    Concurrent Versioning System?
    You can't half tell you're a computer geek! LOL :P

    hippy
    - geekin' it today too

  17. On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 10:57:14 +1000, hippy <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Concurrent Versioning System?
    You can't half tell you're a computer geek! LOL :P

    FSCK!

  18. Carl Brewer said:

    On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 10:57:14 +1000, hippy <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Concurrent Versioning System?
    You can't half tell you're a computer geek! LOL :P

    FSCK!

    hehe It's all right dude.. we all Mac misteaks.. 😉

    ObBike - Carbon-wrapped alu calipers:
    http://www.cyclingnews.com/tech.php?id=tech/2005/reviews/sampson_stratics_brake

    Now all we need is faux-woodgrain bidon cages, under-bike neon lights
    that match rider cadence, maybe some fluffy spoke wrenches...

    hippy
    "My life as a typo"

  19. hippy said:

    hehe It's all right dude.. we all Mac misteaks.. 😉


    ^^^

    Quoted message said:

    ObBike - Carbon-wrapped alu calipers:


    ^^^^^^

    You don't fool me one bit, sir! Next thing, you'll be talking about
    getting a Cocoa fix...

    --
    My Usenet From: address now expires after two weeks. If you email me, and
    the mail bounces, try changing the bit before the "@ to usenet".

  20. On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, hippy wrote:

    <snip>

    Quoted message said:

    Concurrent Versioning System?
    You can't half tell you're a computer geek! LOL :P

    hippy
    - geekin' it today too

    Crikey, you've sent so many posts today! Anyone would think you've had
    nothing to do all day long.

    Tam

    sending too many posts tonight to compensate for absence by racing today.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.