Road Cycling · Public discussion

Gerolsteiner

Started by Bill C · · Last activity · 8 posts · 453 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
15 April 2005
Last activity
18 April 2005
Original author
Bill C
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
453
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hondo getting tagged really sucks. I feel sorry for Udo Bolts who has
    always been one of the good guys, and seriously against doping. At one
    point he stated in a column that he would never let his kids race bikes
    because it was so dirty, and he would have been in a position to know
    just what was going on.
    Hopefully they can bring along some young riders, and keep their
    sponsorship. If Hondo thinks he's going to beat this, with both A&B
    positive he's dreaming. The German economy is in the worst shape it has
    been since that was a reason to hand the government to [censored] so I'm
    not real optimistic about German pro cycling expanding, and wouldn't be
    surprised to see Gerolsteiner fold the team after this season.
    Bill C

  2. Bill C said:

    The German economy is in the worst shape it has
    been since that was a reason to hand the government to [censored] so I'm
    not real optimistic about German pro cycling expanding,

    dumbass,

    it's naive to think that the prosperity of a country's pro teams (even
    in a cycling nation) or the pro-cycling scene in general has any
    connection with the economy.

    pro cycling sponsorship is a tiny background fluctuation and is totally
    disconnected with the large scale economic situation, or even the
    situation of it's main sponsor.

    the money to support a protour team is a fraction of what is spent on
    marketing in general. there are NHL and NBA players you've never heard
    of who make more salary than the budget of a protour team.

    a pro team's existence depends purely on the interest within a company
    from the few people who are in the position to control purse strings.

  3. amit said:
    Bill C said:

    The German economy is in the worst shape it has
    been since that was a reason to hand the government to [censored] so


    I'm

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    not real optimistic about German pro cycling expanding,

    dumbass,

    it's naive to think that the prosperity of a country's pro teams


    (even

    Quoted message said:

    in a cycling nation) or the pro-cycling scene in general has any
    connection with the economy.

    pro cycling sponsorship is a tiny background fluctuation and is


    totally

    Quoted message said:

    disconnected with the large scale economic situation, or even the
    situation of it's main sponsor.

    the money to support a protour team is a fraction of what is spent on
    marketing in general. there are NHL and NBA players you've never


    heard

    Quoted message said:

    of who make more salary than the budget of a protour team.

    a pro team's existence depends purely on the interest within a


    company

    Quoted message said:

    from the few people who are in the position to control purse strings.

    [censored]. When everybody is in the toilet economically, cycling
    sponsorship is going to be really low on the advertising dollars scale.
    You're right about ti being dependent on the preferences of the people
    making decisions, but when the companies are in trouble discretionary
    spending, such as cycling aren't on the agenda.
    Bill C

  4. Bill C said:

    [censored]. When everybody is in the toilet economically, cycling
    sponsorship is going to be really low on the advertising dollars


    scale.

    dumbass,

    obviously if a company has no money they won't sponsor a cycling team,
    but even if the economy is lousy there's money being spent on
    marketing, and a cycling team represents a tiny fraction of that pie.

    the teams that sponsor cycling for the most part aren't even big
    players. i'd never even heard of gerolsteiner until the team came along
    (though they do sell water where i live).

    it's possible that a company like that could be doing well even if the
    economy is [censored].

  5. Bill C said:

    You seem to think that only big business sponsors cycling, or that


    when

    Quoted message said:

    the stock market tanks by several hundred points that doesn't have a
    direct effect on how they spend their money.

    no, i'm said for the most part it's NOT big businesses that are in
    cycling. fassa bortolo and liquigas might be big companies in italy,
    but aren't the biggest companies in the world and they probably aren't
    even the big advertisers in italy.

    some of the biggest US teams are sponsored by companies i'd never heard
    of except through their cycling team: eg. navigators and health net.

    the economy reflects what's happening to the biggest players, and those
    for the most part aren't involved in cycling. so there is some
    disconnection between the economy in general and the health of cycling.

  6. Bill C said:

    Cycling might be a small budget item but it is easy and visible to
    jettison for corporate scum because it shows no immediate results.

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2005/apr05/apr08news
    Boonen's success pays off
    Davitamon manager Marc Coucke has already stressed it, but now also
    Patrick Lefevere's Quick.Step team is proving to be an excellent vehicle
    for its sponsors to invest their budgets. Philiep Caryn, PR manager at
    QuickStep, told the Belgian press that Boonen's win in Flanders has had
    a huge impact: "Of course Tom's win is a golden scenario for us. We
    estimate that last Sunday's race alone accounts for a commercial return
    of 350,000 to 400,000 euro."

    --
    Firefox Web Browser - Rediscover the web - http://getffox.com/
    Thunderbird E-mail and Newsgroups - http://gettbird.com/

  7. should have been "is not the single biggest factor"
    Sorry
    Bill C

  8. Curtis L. Russell said:

    Short of a true depression, someone is always
    doing well - in fact, usually a lot of people are doing well.

    a blurb about the 1981-1982 recession in the usa (from "secrets of the
    temple" by william greider)

    "The economic consequences were barely noticed by some groups and, in
    fact, some sectors flourished throughout the recession. Manufacturing
    was shrinking, but the so-called service sector of the economy actually
    continued to expand throughout the 1981-1982 recession, adding 1.5
    million jobs. In its broadest usage, "services" meant any work or
    business that did not produce something tangible for sale. So the
    general term covered everything from neighborhood drugstores to the
    largest banks and brokerages, from laundries to airlines and insurance
    companies. Service jobs ranged from the menial to the most specialized,
    maids and lawyers, short-order cooks and stockbrokers, key-punch
    operators and molecular biologists. During the recession, one growth
    area for service jobs involved the spreading use of computers and
    high-tech careers. Another growth area was finance and banking, riding
    the resurgence of financial assets."

    i haven't looked into this in more detail, so i can't provide chung
    style data, but i thought it was interesting and somewhat on topic to
    this thread.

    heather

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.