General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

troll FAQ excerpt

Justin Case · 2005-04-02T21:37:19+00:00

From http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm Where does HUDSON fall on this list? Or rather how many of these? Subject: 6. Why do they do it? No one knows why the Trolls act as they do, but there are several theories. Clearly an individual Troll may be in one, or several of these groups, or indeed in none at all. It is difficult to believe, but possible, that a totally normal person would become a Troll. ------------------------------ Subject: 6.1 The Infant or Attention Seeker theory Some believe that the trolls are just adults who brains and morals have not developed beyond childhood, and they are just behaving as attention seeking children. ------------------------------ Subject: 6.2 The retired bitter old person theory. There is evidence that some Trolls are retired persons, with a good pension and little to do with their lives. They may have suffered a personal loss such as the death of a much loved spouse which warped their outlook on life. This type is particularly dangerous, because they may have ample funds to buy computer equipment, own multiple domain names, and multiple access to the internet. Worse they may have, say 8 hour per day to invest in their "hobby". ------------------------------ Subject: 6.3 The insane person theory. Some Trolls may be clinically insane, indeed one posts as Mogadon John which may indicate that he/she is taking this *major* tranquiliser, or it may just be a joke. ------------------------------ Subject: 6.4 The just evil theory. There are people in this world who enjoy destruction. Some enjoy murdering children. Some enjoy sexually abusing children. Some Trolls may be in a similar category. ------------------------------ Subject: 6.5 The sad git theory. There are unfortunately people with such restricted lives that they cannot think of anything useful or constructive to do with the powerful and expensive kit which they are using. ------------------------------ Subject: 6.6 The loser theory. This theory is that the Trolls are just losers who cannot succeed in anything in their real lives. They can however disrupt usenet with relative impunity. ------------------------------

Started by Justin Case · 2 April 2005 · Last activity 3 April 2005 · 18 posts · 451 views

← Back to General fitness, health and nutrition

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

01 / Original posttroll FAQ excerptJustin Case · 2 Apr 2005 02 / This pagePosts 1–18Page 1 of 1 · chronological order 03 / Latest replyPost #18Charles · 3 Apr 2005

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section: General fitness, health and nutrition
Published: 2 April 2005
Last activity: 3 April 2005
Original author: Justin Case
Posts: 18
Discussion status: Public discussion
Total views: 451
Views / 30 days: 0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Original post
Justin Case
Archived post

2 April 2005, 21:37 UTC #1

From http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm
Where does HUDSON fall on this list?
Or rather how many of these?
Subject: 6. Why do they do it?
No one knows why the Trolls act as they do, but there are
several theories. Clearly an individual Troll may be in
one, or several of these groups, or indeed in none at all.
It is difficult to believe, but possible, that a totally
normal person would become a Troll.
------------------------------
Subject: 6.1 The Infant or Attention Seeker theory
Some believe that the trolls are just adults who brains and
morals have not developed beyond childhood, and they are
just behaving as attention seeking children.
------------------------------
Subject: 6.2 The retired bitter old person theory.
There is evidence that some Trolls are retired persons,
with a good pension and little to do with their lives.
They may have suffered a personal loss such as the death of
a much loved spouse which warped their outlook on life.
This type is particularly dangerous, because they may have
ample funds to buy computer equipment, own multiple domain
names, and multiple access to the internet. Worse they
may have, say 8 hour per day to invest in their "hobby".
------------------------------
Subject: 6.3 The insane person theory.
Some Trolls may be clinically insane, indeed one posts as
Mogadon John which may indicate that he/she is taking this
*major* tranquiliser, or it may just be a joke.
------------------------------
Subject: 6.4 The just evil theory.
There are people in this world who enjoy destruction. Some
enjoy murdering children. Some enjoy sexually abusing
children. Some Trolls may be in a similar category.
------------------------------
Subject: 6.5 The sad git theory.
There are unfortunately people with such restricted lives
that they cannot think of anything useful or constructive
to do with the powerful and expensive kit which they are
using.
------------------------------
Subject: 6.6 The loser theory.
This theory is that the Trolls are just losers who cannot
succeed in anything in their real lives. They can however
disrupt usenet with relative impunity.
------------------------------

Report
David
Archived post

2 April 2005, 21:50 UTC #2

"Justin Case" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:

From http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm
Where does HUDSON fall on this list?
Or rather how many of these?
Subject: 6. Why do they do it?
No one knows why the Trolls act as they do, but there are
several theories. Clearly an individual Troll may be in
one, or several of these groups, or indeed in none at all.
It is difficult to believe, but possible, that a totally
normal person would become a Troll.
------------------------------
Subject: 6.1 The Infant or Attention Seeker theory
Some believe that the trolls are just adults who brains and
morals have not developed beyond childhood, and they are
just behaving as attention seeking children.
------------------------------
Subject: 6.2 The retired bitter old person theory.
There is evidence that some Trolls are retired persons,
with a good pension and little to do with their lives.
They may have suffered a personal loss such as the death of
a much loved spouse which warped their outlook on life.
This type is particularly dangerous, because they may have
ample funds to buy computer equipment, own multiple domain
names, and multiple access to the internet. Worse they
may have, say 8 hour per day to invest in their "hobby".
------------------------------
Subject: 6.3 The insane person theory.
Some Trolls may be clinically insane, indeed one posts as
Mogadon John which may indicate that he/she is taking this
*major* tranquiliser, or it may just be a joke.
------------------------------
Subject: 6.4 The just evil theory.
There are people in this world who enjoy destruction. Some
enjoy murdering children. Some enjoy sexually abusing
children. Some Trolls may be in a similar category.
------------------------------
Subject: 6.5 The sad git theory.
There are unfortunately people with such restricted lives
that they cannot think of anything useful or constructive
to do with the powerful and expensive kit which they are
using.
------------------------------
Subject: 6.6 The loser theory.
This theory is that the Trolls are just losers who cannot
succeed in anything in their real lives. They can however
disrupt usenet with relative impunity.
------------------------------
I think that Hudson falls in the category of
Insane Person - it must be obvious that he is clinically insane due to his
attitude toward Mondays.

Report
Charles
Archived post

2 April 2005, 23:12 UTC #3

On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 21:37:19 GMT, Justin Case <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:

From http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm
Where does HUDSON fall on this list?
Or rather how many of these?
Subject: 6. Why do they do it?
No one knows why the Trolls act as they do, but there are
several theories. Clearly an individual Troll may be in
one, or several of these groups, or indeed in none at all.
It is difficult to believe, but possible, that a totally
normal person would become a Troll.
------------------------------
Subject: 6.1 The Infant or Attention Seeker theory
Some believe that the trolls are just adults who brains and
morals have not developed beyond childhood, and they are
just behaving as attention seeking children.
------------------------------
Subject: 6.2 The retired bitter old person theory.
There is evidence that some Trolls are retired persons,
with a good pension and little to do with their lives.
They may have suffered a personal loss such as the death of
a much loved spouse which warped their outlook on life.
This type is particularly dangerous, because they may have
ample funds to buy computer equipment, own multiple domain
names, and multiple access to the internet. Worse they
may have, say 8 hour per day to invest in their "hobby".
------------------------------
Subject: 6.3 The insane person theory.
Some Trolls may be clinically insane, indeed one posts as
Mogadon John which may indicate that he/she is taking this
*major* tranquiliser, or it may just be a joke.
------------------------------
Subject: 6.4 The just evil theory.
There are people in this world who enjoy destruction. Some
enjoy murdering children. Some enjoy sexually abusing
children. Some Trolls may be in a similar category.
------------------------------
Subject: 6.5 The sad git theory.
There are unfortunately people with such restricted lives
that they cannot think of anything useful or constructive
to do with the powerful and expensive kit which they are
using.
------------------------------
Subject: 6.6 The loser theory.
This theory is that the Trolls are just losers who cannot
succeed in anything in their real lives. They can however
disrupt usenet with relative impunity.
I take it you also fell for Ms Volk's April Fool's joke JC and your
Tampax ® has been chafing ever since!!
Take a look in the mirror and compare your mouth with your [censored]. You
should be talking out of the hole just below your nose. If you have
difficulty working out where you're speaking from - so do we!! ;o)
Do have a great weekend old lad - I am!! ;o) <hic>
NFO!!

Report
Charles
Archived post

2 April 2005, 23:38 UTC #4

On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 21:50:09 GMT, "David" <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:

"Justin Case" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:

From http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm
Where does HUDSON fall on this list?
Or rather how many of these?
Subject: 6. Why do they do it?
No one knows why the Trolls act as they do, but there are
several theories. Clearly an individual Troll may be in
one, or several of these groups, or indeed in none at all.
It is difficult to believe, but possible, that a totally
normal person would become a Troll.
------------------------------
Subject: 6.1 The Infant or Attention Seeker theory
Some believe that the trolls are just adults who brains and
morals have not developed beyond childhood, and they are
just behaving as attention seeking children.
------------------------------
Subject: 6.2 The retired bitter old person theory.
There is evidence that some Trolls are retired persons,
with a good pension and little to do with their lives.
They may have suffered a personal loss such as the death of
a much loved spouse which warped their outlook on life.
This type is particularly dangerous, because they may have
ample funds to buy computer equipment, own multiple domain
names, and multiple access to the internet. Worse they
may have, say 8 hour per day to invest in their "hobby".
------------------------------
Subject: 6.3 The insane person theory.
Some Trolls may be clinically insane, indeed one posts as
Mogadon John which may indicate that he/she is taking this
*major* tranquiliser, or it may just be a joke.
------------------------------
Subject: 6.4 The just evil theory.
There are people in this world who enjoy destruction. Some
enjoy murdering children. Some enjoy sexually abusing
children. Some Trolls may be in a similar category.
------------------------------
Subject: 6.5 The sad git theory.
There are unfortunately people with such restricted lives
that they cannot think of anything useful or constructive
to do with the powerful and expensive kit which they are
using.
------------------------------
Subject: 6.6 The loser theory.
This theory is that the Trolls are just losers who cannot
succeed in anything in their real lives. They can however
disrupt usenet with relative impunity.
------------------------------
I think that Hudson falls in the category of
Insane Person - it must be obvious that he is clinically insane due to his
attitude toward Mondays.
That is cruel and absolutely untrue.
I am below par on Mondays because I am suffering the results of
overindulgence during the preceding weekends.
I am "insane" for a multitude of other reasons, including my addiction
to posting daily to MFW, and dealing with sulks like Ms Volk who can't
take an April Fool stunt gracefully, and coping with silly [censored] like
"Justin Case" (very original) who can't get it up!!
What's your excuse David? ;o)
Have a great Sunday mate - I intend to, but first it's a good night's
sleep to recover from a hectic Saturday!!
TTFN

Report
David
Archived post

3 April 2005, 01:37 UTC #5

"Charles" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 21:50:09 GMT, "David" <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:

"Justin Case" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:

From http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm
Where does HUDSON fall on this list?
Or rather how many of these?
Subject: 6. Why do they do it?
No one knows why the Trolls act as they do, but there are
several theories. Clearly an individual Troll may be in
one, or several of these groups, or indeed in none at all.
It is difficult to believe, but possible, that a totally
normal person would become a Troll.
------------------------------
Subject: 6.1 The Infant or Attention Seeker theory
Some believe that the trolls are just adults who brains and
morals have not developed beyond childhood, and they are
just behaving as attention seeking children.
------------------------------
Subject: 6.2 The retired bitter old person theory.
There is evidence that some Trolls are retired persons,
with a good pension and little to do with their lives.
They may have suffered a personal loss such as the death of
a much loved spouse which warped their outlook on life.
This type is particularly dangerous, because they may have
ample funds to buy computer equipment, own multiple domain
names, and multiple access to the internet. Worse they
may have, say 8 hour per day to invest in their "hobby".
------------------------------
Subject: 6.3 The insane person theory.
Some Trolls may be clinically insane, indeed one posts as
Mogadon John which may indicate that he/she is taking this
*major* tranquiliser, or it may just be a joke.
------------------------------
Subject: 6.4 The just evil theory.
There are people in this world who enjoy destruction. Some
enjoy murdering children. Some enjoy sexually abusing
children. Some Trolls may be in a similar category.
------------------------------
Subject: 6.5 The sad git theory.
There are unfortunately people with such restricted lives
that they cannot think of anything useful or constructive
to do with the powerful and expensive kit which they are
using.
------------------------------
Subject: 6.6 The loser theory.
This theory is that the Trolls are just losers who cannot
succeed in anything in their real lives. They can however
disrupt usenet with relative impunity.
------------------------------
I think that Hudson falls in the category of
Insane Person - it must be obvious that he is clinically insane due to

his
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
attitude toward Mondays.
That is cruel and absolutely untrue.
I am below par on Mondays because I am suffering the results of
overindulgence during the preceding weekends.
I am "insane" for a multitude of other reasons, including my addiction
to posting daily to MFW, and dealing with sulks like Ms Volk who can't
take an April Fool stunt gracefully, and coping with silly [censored] like
"Justin Case" (very original) who can't get it up!!
What's your excuse David? ;o)
Have a great Sunday mate - I intend to, but first it's a good night's
sleep to recover from a hectic Saturday!!
TTFN
I take comfort in the fact that a great percentage of geniuses are insane by
way of the usual definition of the word. However I neither look or act
insane (not that there is anything wrong with it!)

Report
Email address hidden
Archived post

3 April 2005, 01:40 UTC #6

i vote for just evil and sad git
and lee michaels personal stalker too.
or are you his fan?

Report
David
Archived post

3 April 2005, 02:05 UTC #7

<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:

i vote for just evil and sad git
and lee michaels personal stalker too.
or are you his fan?
John, whose fan are you referring to i.e. Hudson's fan or Lee Michael's
fan? (mind you, I don't believe Lee has any fans in this ng unless Mrs
Michaels lurks here)

Report
JMW
Archived post

3 April 2005, 03:02 UTC #8

Justin Case said:

From http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm
Where does HUDSON fall on this list?
Or rather how many of these?
Subject: 6. Why do they do it?
No one knows why the Trolls act as they do, but there are
several theories. Clearly an individual Troll may be in
one, or several of these groups, or indeed in none at all.
It is difficult to believe, but possible, that a totally
normal person would become a Troll.
------------------------------
Subject: 6.1 The Infant or Attention Seeker theory
Some believe that the trolls are just adults who brains and
morals have not developed beyond childhood, and they are
just behaving as attention seeking children.
------------------------------
Subject: 6.2 The retired bitter old person theory.
There is evidence that some Trolls are retired persons,
with a good pension and little to do with their lives.
They may have suffered a personal loss such as the death of
a much loved spouse which warped their outlook on life.
This type is particularly dangerous, because they may have
ample funds to buy computer equipment, own multiple domain
names, and multiple access to the internet. Worse they
may have, say 8 hour per day to invest in their "hobby".
<heh> I like it ...
Hudson 6.2
This version is no longer supported.
--
JMW
http://www.rustyiron.net

Report
Email address hidden
Archived post

3 April 2005, 05:41 UTC #9

David said:
<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:

i vote for just evil and sad git
and lee michaels personal stalker too.
or are you his fan?
John, whose fan are you referring to i.e. Hudson's fan or Lee

Michael's
Quoted message said:
fan? (mind you, I don't believe Lee has any fans in this ng unless

Mrs
Quoted message said:
Michaels lurks here)
john being lees fan. as in a fanatic. from dictionary.com
3: an ardent follower and admirer
ha cant leave him alone. its like he cant stop thikning about him.
i only lurk here sometimes but its obvious. so now im next right?

Report
David
Archived post

3 April 2005, 06:03 UTC #10

<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:

David said:
<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:

i vote for just evil and sad git
and lee michaels personal stalker too.
or are you his fan?
John, whose fan are you referring to i.e. Hudson's fan or Lee

Michael's
Quoted message said:
fan? (mind you, I don't believe Lee has any fans in this ng unless

Mrs
Quoted message said:
Michaels lurks here)
john being lees fan. as in a fanatic. from dictionary.com
3: an ardent follower and admirer
ha cant leave him alone. its like he cant stop thikning about him.
i only lurk here sometimes but its obvious. so now im next right?
No John, you would not qualify as in order to be targeted you need to be 1)
abysmally stupid 2) arrogant 3) have something up your [censored].
So 2 out of 3 would not be enough. Lee qualifies.

Report
JMW
Archived post

3 April 2005, 06:39 UTC #11

David said:

Quoted message said:

David said:
<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
>
> i vote for just evil and sad git
> and lee michaels personal stalker too.
> or are you his fan?
John, whose fan are you referring to i.e. Hudson's fan or Lee
Michael's
fan? (mind you, I don't believe Lee has any fans in this ng unless
Mrs Michaels lurks here)
john being lees fan. as in a fanatic. from dictionary.com
3: an ardent follower and admirer
ha cant leave him alone. its like he cant stop thikning about him.
i only lurk here sometimes but its obvious. so now im next right?
No John, you would not qualify as in order to be targeted you need to be 1)
abysmally stupid 2) arrogant 3) have something up your [censored].
So 2 out of 3 would not be enough. Lee qualifies.
Actually, you're more obsessed with Lee than Hudson is.
I'll let you decide for yourself just how pathetic that is.
--
JMW
http://www.rustyiron.net

Report
Charles
Archived post

3 April 2005, 07:34 UTC #12

On Sun, 03 Apr 2005 01:37:51 GMT, "David" <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:

"Charles" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 21:50:09 GMT, "David" <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:

"Justin Case" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
>
> From http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm
>
>
> Where does HUDSON fall on this list?
> Or rather how many of these?
>
>
> Subject: 6. Why do they do it?
>
> No one knows why the Trolls act as they do, but there are
> several theories. Clearly an individual Troll may be in
> one, or several of these groups, or indeed in none at all.
> It is difficult to believe, but possible, that a totally
> normal person would become a Troll.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: 6.1 The Infant or Attention Seeker theory
>
> Some believe that the trolls are just adults who brains and
> morals have not developed beyond childhood, and they are
> just behaving as attention seeking children.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: 6.2 The retired bitter old person theory.
>
> There is evidence that some Trolls are retired persons,
> with a good pension and little to do with their lives.
> They may have suffered a personal loss such as the death of
> a much loved spouse which warped their outlook on life.
>
> This type is particularly dangerous, because they may have
> ample funds to buy computer equipment, own multiple domain
> names, and multiple access to the internet. Worse they
> may have, say 8 hour per day to invest in their "hobby".
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: 6.3 The insane person theory.
>
> Some Trolls may be clinically insane, indeed one posts as
> Mogadon John which may indicate that he/she is taking this
> *major* tranquiliser, or it may just be a joke.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: 6.4 The just evil theory.
>
> There are people in this world who enjoy destruction. Some
> enjoy murdering children. Some enjoy sexually abusing
> children. Some Trolls may be in a similar category.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: 6.5 The sad git theory.
>
> There are unfortunately people with such restricted lives
> that they cannot think of anything useful or constructive
> to do with the powerful and expensive kit which they are
> using.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: 6.6 The loser theory.
>
> This theory is that the Trolls are just losers who cannot
> succeed in anything in their real lives. They can however
> disrupt usenet with relative impunity.
>
> ------------------------------
I think that Hudson falls in the category of
Insane Person - it must be obvious that he is clinically insane due to

his
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
attitude toward Mondays.
That is cruel and absolutely untrue.
I am below par on Mondays because I am suffering the results of
overindulgence during the preceding weekends.
I am "insane" for a multitude of other reasons, including my addiction
to posting daily to MFW, and dealing with sulks like Ms Volk who can't
take an April Fool stunt gracefully, and coping with silly [censored] like
"Justin Case" (very original) who can't get it up!!
What's your excuse David? ;o)
Have a great Sunday mate - I intend to, but first it's a good night's
sleep to recover from a hectic Saturday!!
TTFN
I take comfort in the fact that a great percentage of geniuses are insane by
way of the usual definition of the word. However I neither look or act
insane (not that there is anything wrong with it!)
I think you carry it off very well!!
Have a great Sunday - I intend to!! ;o)

Report
David
Archived post

3 April 2005, 08:10 UTC #13

"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
David said:

Quoted message said:

David wrote:
> <[email hidden]> wrote in message
> news:[email hidden]...
> >
> > i vote for just evil and sad git
> > and lee michaels personal stalker too.
> > or are you his fan?
>
> John, whose fan are you referring to i.e. Hudson's fan or Lee
> Michael's
> fan? (mind you, I don't believe Lee has any fans in this ng unless
> Mrs Michaels lurks here)
john being lees fan. as in a fanatic. from dictionary.com
3: an ardent follower and admirer
ha cant leave him alone. its like he cant stop thikning about him.
i only lurk here sometimes but its obvious. so now im next right?
No John, you would not qualify as in order to be targeted you need to be

1)
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
abysmally stupid 2) arrogant 3) have something up your [censored].
So 2 out of 3 would not be enough. Lee qualifies.
Actually, you're more obsessed with Lee than Hudson is.
I'll let you decide for yourself just how pathetic that is.
--
JMW
http://www.rustyiron.net
Please John . . .have patience with me. I am seeking counselling. I know .
.. .I have a problem. If not for my family and close friends . . .time heals
all wounds. In my heart I know he is a decent person. (at least he's not a
compulsive liar and fraud like that sob Brinks!)

Report
Charles
Archived post

3 April 2005, 08:21 UTC #14

JMW said:
Justin Case said:

From http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm
Where does HUDSON fall on this list?
Or rather how many of these?
Subject: 6. Why do they do it?
No one knows why the Trolls act as they do, but there are
several theories. Clearly an individual Troll may be in
one, or several of these groups, or indeed in none at all.
It is difficult to believe, but possible, that a totally
normal person would become a Troll.
------------------------------
Subject: 6.1 The Infant or Attention Seeker theory
Some believe that the trolls are just adults who brains and
morals have not developed beyond childhood, and they are
just behaving as attention seeking children.
------------------------------
Subject: 6.2 The retired bitter old person theory.
There is evidence that some Trolls are retired persons,
with a good pension and little to do with their lives.
They may have suffered a personal loss such as the death of
a much loved spouse which warped their outlook on life.
This type is particularly dangerous, because they may have
ample funds to buy computer equipment, own multiple domain
names, and multiple access to the internet. Worse they
may have, say 8 hour per day to invest in their "hobby".
<heh> I like it ...
Hudson 6.2
<heh>
I thought you might like that Williams!! ;o)
How about this one for a 50 year old assistant prosecutor who is going
nowhere fast:
------------------------------
Subject: 6.6 The loser theory.
This theory is that the Trolls are just losers who cannot
succeed in anything in their real lives. They can however
disrupt usenet with relative impunity.
------------------------------
Quoted message said:

This version is no longer supported.
And neither are you, and you never really have been!!
Have a great Sunday john boy, if you can - you know I will!! ;o)

Report
Charles
Archived post

3 April 2005, 08:34 UTC #15

On Sun, 03 Apr 2005 06:03:48 GMT, "David" <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:

<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:

David said:
<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
>
> i vote for just evil and sad git
> and lee michaels personal stalker too.
> or are you his fan?
John, whose fan are you referring to i.e. Hudson's fan or Lee

Michael's
Quoted message said:
fan? (mind you, I don't believe Lee has any fans in this ng unless

Mrs
Quoted message said:
Michaels lurks here)
john being lees fan. as in a fanatic. from dictionary.com
3: an ardent follower and admirer
ha cant leave him alone. its like he cant stop thikning about him.
i only lurk here sometimes but its obvious. so now im next right?
No John, you would not qualify as in order to be targeted you need to be 1)
abysmally stupid 2) arrogant 3) have something up your [censored].
So 2 out of 3 would not be enough. Lee qualifies.
<heh>
Good response - I like it!! ;o)
HAGS!!

Report
Charles
Archived post

3 April 2005, 08:36 UTC #16

JMW said:
David said:

Quoted message said:

David wrote:
> <[email hidden]> wrote in message
> news:[email hidden]...
> >
> > i vote for just evil and sad git
> > and lee michaels personal stalker too.
> > or are you his fan?
>
> John, whose fan are you referring to i.e. Hudson's fan or Lee
> Michael's
> fan? (mind you, I don't believe Lee has any fans in this ng unless
> Mrs Michaels lurks here)
john being lees fan. as in a fanatic. from dictionary.com
3: an ardent follower and admirer
ha cant leave him alone. its like he cant stop thikning about him.
i only lurk here sometimes but its obvious. so now im next right?
No John, you would not qualify as in order to be targeted you need to be 1)
abysmally stupid 2) arrogant 3) have something up your [censored].
So 2 out of 3 would not be enough. Lee qualifies.
Actually, you're more obsessed with Lee than Hudson is.
Actually, you're more obsessed with Hudson than Hudson is!! ;o)
Quoted message said:

I'll let you decide for yourself just how pathetic that is.
How very true Counsellor, the residents of Hick's County would be very
proud of you!! ;o)
HAGS!!

Report
Justin Case
Archived post

3 April 2005, 15:44 UTC #17

Charles said:
On Sun, 03 Apr 2005 01:39:18 -0500, JMW <[email hidden]> wrote:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:

Actually, you're more obsessed with Lee than Hudson is.
Actually, you're more obsessed with Hudson than Hudson is!! ;o)

No-one's more obecessed with hudson that hudson (and maybe david).
It's ALL about you, isn't it?
You and your delicate little feelings.

Report
Charles
Archived post

3 April 2005, 16:28 UTC #18

On Sun, 03 Apr 2005 15:44:06 GMT, Justin Case <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
Charles said:
On Sun, 03 Apr 2005 01:39:18 -0500, JMW <[email hidden]> wrote:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:

Actually, you're more obsessed with Lee than Hudson is.
Actually, you're more obsessed with Hudson than Hudson is!! ;o)

No-one's more obecessed with hudson that hudson (and maybe david).
I think you forgot poor old Williams!!
Quoted message said:
It's ALL about you, isn't it?
It's all about all of us JC, as we are all individually the centre of
the Universe!!
Quoted message said:
You and your delicate little feelings.
You brute, unhand me Sirrah!! ;o)

Report

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.

Jump through the discussion

What we know about this thread

Continue through CyclingForums

Active in this thread