Just put a 7sp z chain on my commuter, with the missing link. I'm curious why the missing link is needed? The chain looks normal to me, but the instructions say it could break if the original pins are reinserted. What benefits are there to construct a chain this way?
Also it says the missing link can only be removed with a chain tool, but I thought you could unlink these things by squeezing the rollers together with pliers? If I use a chain tool to remove it, will it be ok to reuse a few times or does one need to buy a new missing link each time?
Just put a 7sp z chain on my commuter, with the missing link. I'm curious why the missing link is needed? The chain looks normal to me, but the instructions say it could break if the original pins are reinserted. What benefits are there to construct a chain this way?
the benefit is that the chain doesn't break on you. if you have extreme angle deviation, the leverage between the plates can pop the outer plate off the rivet. the solution is to peen the rivet head sufficiently to form a ridge that keeps the plate in place. removal of that rivet breaks the ridge and it cannot easily be re-peened, especially not while retaining necessary plate separation.
solution: use a special join link.
Quoted message said:
Also it says the missing link can only be removed with a chain tool, but I thought you could unlink these things by squeezing the rollers together with pliers? If I use a chain tool to remove it, will it be ok to reuse a few times or does one need to buy a new missing link each time?
if the factory spec says use new one eack time, that's what you should do. it's better to sue them for ripping you off for purchasing excess links than it is to try suing for broken teeth because you didn't pay attention to their instructions.
Just put a 7sp z chain on my commuter, with the missing link. I'm curious why the missing link is needed? The chain looks normal to me, but the instructions say it could break if the original pins are reinserted. What benefits are there to construct a chain this way?
the benefit is that the chain doesn't break on you. if you have extreme angle deviation, the leverage between the plates can pop the outer plate off the rivet. the solution is to peen the rivet head sufficiently to form a ridge that keeps the plate in place. removal of that rivet breaks the ridge and it cannot easily be re-peened, especially not while retaining necessary plate separation.
solution: use a special join link.
Quoted message said:
Also it says the missing link can only be removed with a chain tool, but I thought you could unlink these things by squeezing the rollers together with pliers? If I use a chain tool to remove it, will it be ok to reuse a few times or does one need to buy a new missing link each time?
if the factory spec says use new one eack time, that's what you should do. it's better to sue them for ripping you off for purchasing excess links than it is to try suing for broken teeth because you didn't pay attention to their instructions.
Just put a 7sp z chain on my commuter, with the missing link. I'm curious why the missing link is needed? The chain looks normal to me, but the instructions say it could break if the original pins are reinserted. What benefits are there to construct a chain this way?
the benefit is that the chain doesn't break on you. if you have extreme angle deviation, the leverage between the plates can pop the outer plate off the rivet. the solution is to peen the rivet head sufficiently to form a ridge that keeps the plate in place. removal of that rivet breaks the ridge and it cannot easily be re-peened, especially not while retaining necessary plate separation.
solution: use a special join link.
But regular (re-usable rivet type) chains exist and I have never broken one nor heard of any breaking in the manner you describe. Is there indeed a risk of such ordinary chains breaking, or does this z-chain use rivets that are less able to hold together without peens but have some other advantage?
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Also it says the missing link can only be removed with a chain tool, but I thought you could unlink these things by squeezing the rollers together with pliers? If I use a chain tool to remove it, will it be ok to reuse a few times or does one need to buy a new missing link each time?
if the factory spec says use new one eack time, that's what you should do. it's better to sue them for ripping you off for purchasing excess links than it is to try suing for broken teeth because you didn't pay attention to their instructions.
Who said anything about lawsuits? The instructions don't mention anything about reusing the links, only that they must be removed with a chain tool.
Just put a 7sp z chain on my commuter, with the missing link. I'm curious why the missing link is needed? The chain looks normal to me, but the instructions say it could break if the original pins are reinserted. What benefits are there to construct a chain this way?
Also it says the missing link can only be removed with a chain tool, but I thought you could unlink these things by squeezing the rollers together with pliers? If I use a chain tool to remove it, will it be ok to reuse a few times or does one need to buy a new missing link each time?
I believe the KMC snaplink is just as reuseable as any other ( if snapped open - not if destroyed with a chain tool!). The 'one time use' admonishment seems to be somewhere between 'don't sue us' and 'buy a new part from us'.
-- Andrew Muzi www.yellowjersey.org Open every day since 1 April, 1971
Just put a 7sp z chain on my commuter, with the missing link. I'm curious why the missing link is needed? The chain looks normal to me, but the instructions say it could break if the original pins are reinserted. What benefits are there to construct a chain this way?
the benefit is that the chain doesn't break on you. if you have extreme angle deviation, the leverage between the plates can pop the outer plate off the rivet. the solution is to peen the rivet head sufficiently to form a ridge that keeps the plate in place. removal of that rivet breaks the ridge and it cannot easily be re-peened, especially not while retaining necessary plate separation.
solution: use a special join link.
But regular (re-usable rivet type) chains exist and I have never broken one nor heard of any breaking in the manner you describe. Is there indeed a risk of such ordinary chains breaking, or does this z-chain use rivets that are less able to hold together without peens but have some other advantage?
there's little/no risk on bikes where there's not much derailleur angle. no, rivets are all similar in design, they just vary slightly in the peening method. again, if you had a peening tool & could be sure of doing it /and/ maintaining the same plate spacing, you could re-use any rivet for sure. the difficulty [& the safety factor] come from the fact that it's hard to do.
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Also it says the missing link can only be removed with a chain tool, but I thought you could unlink these things by squeezing the rollers together with pliers? If I use a chain tool to remove it, will it be ok to reuse a few times or does one need to buy a new missing link each time?
if the factory spec says use new one eack time, that's what you should do. it's better to sue them for ripping you off for purchasing excess links than it is to try suing for broken teeth because you didn't pay attention to their instructions.
Who said anything about lawsuits?
me. that's your only hope of injury remedy.
Quoted message said:
The instructions don't mention anything about reusing the links, only that they must be removed with a chain tool.
but don't you want to re-use? i simply explained what happens when you use the chain tool & the issue with reassembly of used rivets.
When I first began using KMC chains I also thought the "Missing Link" was a reusable item similar to the Sram Powerlink. It is not. Once connected it cannot be disconnected by use of bare hands. I was able to reuse mine only by disconnecting it by using a pair of needle-nose pliers. I won't go into detail on how I de-linked it, suffice to say that after a couple of times doing it, I said "the heck with it" and pulled out a Powerlink and used it. The Powerlink quick release link is reusable and in my opinion separates easily without the need for tools.
try colored paper clips to hold the snap links in the assumed position for assembling in reverse order-the clips can be wound around a spoke to hold the front half in place while struggling with the expletive deleted deray cage. the shimano chain pins-see nashbar-are dandy in the toolbox for the time when the chain gioves up in one or two places but the remainder is ok-crosschaining while the chain is gritted- but using the replacement pins more than once expands the sideplates and chain degradation results. thus the reusable link
"Kenny" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
When I first began using KMC chains I also thought the "Missing Link" was a reusable item similar to the Sram Powerlink. It is not. Once connected it cannot be disconnected by use of bare hands. I was able to reuse mine only by disconnecting it by using a pair of needle-nose pliers. I won't go into detail on how I de-linked it, suffice to say that after a couple of times doing it, I said "the heck with it" and pulled out a Powerlink and used it. The Powerlink quick release link is reusable and in my opinion separates easily without the need for tools.
Similar results for me. If you take the easy route by using the chain tool to remove the KMC link, it's probably not a good idea to reuse. If you can back it out with needle-nose my guess would be it's ok to reuse, but it's not made to be easy to do this. I did this once or twice.
However, after reading posts about chain care here in rbt, I no longer take my chain off to clean. I just wipe it down with a rag and re-oil and wipe off excess about every two weeks or after rain. I have road bikes and live in the flats and I get at least 4000 miles before they stretch more than 1/16" (in 12"😉 and get replaced.
