Hi Helen,
A few years ago I was seriously injured by a 'hit and run' driver who
had tried to overtake me and turn left at the same time. I was left
unconscious in a huge pool of blood, only coming around as the
ambulance was taking me away. There were plenty of independent
witnesses as to what happened, including some road menders who were
working on the pavement just a few feet away. Humberside police came to
see me in hospital to get a statement and I was told that the vehicle
and driver well known and that he was driving whilst disqualified.
However they then did bugger all to bring a prosecution. I complained
to the head of the traffic section and the officer who came to see me
in hospital eventually came round admitting that as I wasn't actually
killed his superior officer had though pursuing the case should be
given a low priority and he hadn't even been given permission to
attempt to interview the driver until a month after the event. When the
driver wasn't in they never bothered going back again, even though they
knew he was driving whilst disqualified. I made a claim for my injures
to the MIB (being represented by the BCF) which I was granted.
Humberside police took months to send the witness statements to my
lawyer (Sue Bence) and she said she was 'utterly amazed at the
information contained therein "No further enquiries have been made of
Andrew Dixon"'(The driver who committed the hit and run). She did try
to prise an explanation for the lack of action from Humberside Police
but it seems one was never forwarded.
Another officer in the traffic section who I had dealings with in
relation to the organisation of a major race in the area told me that a
certain senior traffic officer was of the opinion that disqualified
drivers were not a problem as they were so afraid of being caught they
made very careful drivers! Honestly!
Last summer some 'modded' chavmobile came past me with the passenger
hanging out the car window shouting abuse and trying to push me off. He
did the same to another cyclist a few hundred yards in front of me.
Something similar happened again a while later when they re-passed me.
I got the number and tried to report it to the police requesting that
they at least run an insurance check. (Since Humberside Police Chief
Constable David Westwood scrapped the traffic section a few years back
a fifth of drivers in the Hull area don't bother with insurance and
over half of all crashes causing death or injury result in a 'hit and
run' offence). I was told they were not interested in taking a
statement as without independent witnesses they could not get a
prosecution. I said I only wanted an insurance check run and a look out
for the car posted if it came up as uninsured. They told me they had
checked the registration and that the car had come up as unregistered
but were not prepared to make any attempts to trace the vehicle or the
driver as 'this often happens due to the backlog at the DVLC'.
A couple of months ago a couple of low-lifes were racing each other
over a local flyover doing perhaps 60 mph plus in a 30, cutting in and
out of cars and overtaking on the inside and so on. On cutting back to
the left one of them lost control (or as the motor-centric press would
have it 'the car went out of control'😉 and the driver spun around in
the road hitting a barrier at the side of the road and causing a bus
to do an emergency stop. I called Humberside police offering a
statement in case the bus driver had reported it and anyone had been
injured on the bus. Humberside police point blank refused to take any
statement at all saying they got so many similar reports a day they
couldn't log them all.
A few months ago a colleague of my wife's was seriously injured in a
'dooring' incident after which the driver made off. They traced and
interviewed the driver but made no charges whatsoever. Lst October I
made a complaint to Humberside Police about their traffic policing
policy and an inspector did come round to see me. He seemed to be very
decent bloke but much of what he said only confirmed my misgivings. For
example he admitted that it was an unofficial policy of Humberside
police not to prosecute drivers unless, in effect they had put someone
into a coffin or a wheelchair.
On the other hand Humberside police have been running some high profile
campaigns against 'pavement cyclists' handing out FPN's seemingly
without paying any notice whatsoever to the Home Office guidelines on
their use. They also seem to be quite keen on chasing cases where
cyclists whose lives have been endangered by careless and aggressive
drivers have caused damage to a car whilst under the influence of 'My
god I was almost killed there' adrenaline'. I have even seen the police
post in the local paper calling for witnesses to cases of a wing mirror
being damaged by a cyclist. However, just before Christmas the wife of
a friend of mine was killed by a van as she cycled across a cycle
crossing . The police didn't even put a notice in the paper requesting
that any witnesses come forward.
If you are looking for some good 'official' quotes on the attitudes of
the police towards driving crime and cyclists have a look at The House
of Commons Transport Committees report 'Traffic law and it's
enforcement at:
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmtran/cmtran.htm
I feel that many in Humberside police (motto 'Protect, Help, Reassure)
do have a strong pro-driver/ anti-cyclist agenda. I called into one of
the local 'Community Cop Shops' to make enquires about one their
anti-pavement cyclists 'crackdowns' asking if they would also be
willing to address issues such as all the delivery and HGV drivers
leaving the local factories constantly using hand held mobile phones
when driving, or perhaps enforce the speed limit in the local 20 Mph
zone. I was told that as far as the officer was concerned I was 'Just a
cyclist who didn't like drivers'. (He didn't seem to believe me when I
said I also own a car...).
Then again Humberside police does have a reputation for general
incompetence and worse. First there was the case of Christopher Alder,
a black guy who was assaulted and then latter arrested by police when
he because abusive at the local hospital. He left the hospital
seemingly well but arrived at the custody suite at Queens Gardens
police station unconscious with his underpants and trousers around his
ankles and with injures not recorded at the hospital when an assessment
was made of his injuries sustained as a result of the earlier assault.
(Including having his teeth almost knocked through his lip). He was
then left unconscious in the custody suite floor, still naked from the
waist down, whilst a number of officer stood around joking. He died 6
or 7 minutes later and a short while after this the officers were heard
laughing on the custody suite tape making jokes about bananas and so
on. Of course, charges against the officers were dropped and they have
all now take 'early retirement' on a police pension.
Then there was the Huntley fiasco, and a couple of days ago Humberside
police executed, sorry, shot dead, a local man who had driven the wrong
way down a local dual carriageway and was brandishing a 'sword-like
weapon'. They have also been rated the second lowest performing police
force in the whole country so perhaps the experiences I had were just
symptomatic of a deeper rot.
Perhaps it is unrealistic to expect any more from the police given
that the police are bound to reflect the prejudices in society and all
it takes is a few incompetent management decisions (Such as David
Westwood's decision to scrap dedicated traffic teams) to affect the
whole way the police service operates. Then again, not all forces seem
to be as bad as Humberside! Much seems to depend on the attitudes of
the Chief Police officer and senior management. I would also emphasise
that even Humberside has some excellent officers, including their
former Traffic Management Officer, a Sgt. Swann. Of course after
giving him a few years to learn the learn the job properly they moved
him elsewhere...
Regards,
Howard.