Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Re: Most comfortable saddle?

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 6 posts · 520 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
20 March 2005
Last activity
22 March 2005
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
520
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. BROOKS B17 Standard. I suffrered for years with poor saddle comfort.
    With a Brooks you will ride until legs fail not stop because of butt
    pain

  2. Quoted message said:

    BROOKS B17 Standard. I suffrered for years with poor saddle comfort.
    With a Brooks you will ride until legs fail not stop because of butt
    pain

    I'm one of a lot of people who found Brooks to be about the most
    uncomfortable saddle they've ever tried. My theory is that I need a
    saddle that is relatively flat front-to-back. I like Flites and similar
    saddles. On my MTB I have a Titec "Beserker" which is like an oversize
    Flite, which another large (6'4"😉 friend also swears by. I had a little
    less luck with WTB saddles, but my wife finds them "perfect" so she
    rides them both on & off-road. I also find Terry saddles less
    comfortable, like the WTB saddles, they have a bit of sag
    front-to-back, but nowhere near what leather saddles have. My current
    favorite is a Selle Italia "Tri-matic" (very much like a Turbomatic, I
    guess), very flat. I've done double centuries and beyond on this one. I
    swapped with my sister for the B17, we both wound up happy.

    A funny anecdote: I was looking for a saddle for my (road) beater, and
    in my box of discards was a woman-specific MTB saddle that I bought
    years ago & my wife hated. I threw it on my bike and found it to be
    pretty confortable, so there it will stay. It's a very small saddle,
    and I'm a very large (6'10", 235) guy, but it's flat, and that seems to
    be the key for me.

  3. I have tried Many Many saddles. My current saddle is a Selle Italia
    Prolink Gel Flow. I really like it, it a nice cross between a
    narrower racing style and a wider more comfortable saddle. Another
    saddle I really like is the Avocet O2 Air 40 Men's saddle. Its
    wider and more of a touring saddle. They also make it in a narrower
    racing style, that I have not tried but I'll bet it would be good.

    Both of these have the anatomical cut out or recession which is
    key to comfort and avoiding future sorrows.

    -Alex

    Peter Cole said:


    Quoted message said:

    BROOKS B17 Standard. I suffrered for years with poor saddle comfort.
    With a Brooks you will ride until legs fail not stop because of butt
    pain

    I'm one of a lot of people who found Brooks to be about the most
    uncomfortable saddle they've ever tried. My theory is that I need a
    saddle that is relatively flat front-to-back. I like Flites and similar
    saddles. On my MTB I have a Titec "Beserker" which is like an oversize
    Flite, which another large (6'4"😉 friend also swears by. I had a little
    less luck with WTB saddles, but my wife finds them "perfect" so she
    rides them both on & off-road. I also find Terry saddles less
    comfortable, like the WTB saddles, they have a bit of sag
    front-to-back, but nowhere near what leather saddles have. My current
    favorite is a Selle Italia "Tri-matic" (very much like a Turbomatic, I
    guess), very flat. I've done double centuries and beyond on this one. I
    swapped with my sister for the B17, we both wound up happy.

    A funny anecdote: I was looking for a saddle for my (road) beater, and
    in my box of discards was a woman-specific MTB saddle that I bought
    years ago & my wife hated. I threw it on my bike and found it to be
    pretty confortable, so there it will stay. It's a very small saddle,
    and I'm a very large (6'10", 235) guy, but it's flat, and that seems to
    be the key for me.

    \

  4. Aman said:


    Both of these have the anatomical cut out or recession which is
    key to comfort and avoiding future sorrows.

    You obviously took the blue pill.

  5. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    I like Flites and similar
    saddles. On my MTB I have a Titec "Beserker" which is like an oversize
    Flite, which another large (6'4"😉 friend also swears by.


    I've arrived at the same solution -- Flites on my road bikes, a Titec
    Berserker on my MTB. For me, the Titec feels like an oversized Flite
    with more padding for shock absorption.

    Rick

  6. I rode with an old flite ti for several years, until I developed a
    severe UTI after a particularly long ride. Apparently some scarring
    resulted (psychological or otherwise), as I was never able to get comfy
    on that saddle again - at least, not on my road bike with a 2-4" saddle
    to bar drop (It's happily perched on my MTB now). I then tried a flite
    gel (the older style with three distinct gel pads), and while I was not
    blown away, It served for a few years. In time, however, the gel seems
    to have hardened. My latest acquisition is a Terry Fly Ti, which I've
    spent several hours on the trainer and a few 1.5-2 hour rides on thus
    far. Much more comfortable than the flite gel, but the profile is
    taking some adjustment - very flat, rather than the slight upward flare
    that the Selle Italia saddles had

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.