Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Alignment issues w/ current aluminum frames

Started by Dave · · Last activity · 4 posts · 390 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
20 March 2005
Last activity
21 March 2005
Original author
Dave
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
390
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Quick question relevant mainly to bottom-feeders like me who buy/sell
    lots of used stuff to tinker with...

    My question concerns aluminum frames made in the last few years (i.e.
    thin-walled tubing, more fragile than 80's/early 90's stuff). Have you
    guys seen frames of this type that have had crash damage sufficient to
    misalign the frame but NOT sufficient to create visible
    cracks/dents/paint ripples/etc.? Given the delicate construction of
    such frames, I'd imagine not, but this is really a guess and I'm
    interested to hear from the R.B.T. mechanic gurus who see these things
    every day.

    The reason I ask is because I'd like to know whether a visual
    inspection is sufficient (say, 95% confidence) to assess the condition
    of one of these frames, or whether you'd need to check alignment too to
    be sure.

  2. On 20 Mar 2005 10:14:27 -0800, "Dave" <[email hidden]> may have

    Quoted message said:

    My question concerns aluminum frames made in the last few years (i.e.
    thin-walled tubing, more fragile than 80's/early 90's stuff). Have you
    guys seen frames of this type that have had crash damage sufficient to
    misalign the frame but NOT sufficient to create visible
    cracks/dents/paint ripples/etc.?

    It can happen...but there's another issue to beware of as well.

    Quoted message said:

    Given the delicate construction of
    such frames, I'd imagine not, but this is really a guess and I'm
    interested to hear from the R.B.T. mechanic gurus who see these things
    every day.

    The reason I ask is because I'd like to know whether a visual
    inspection is sufficient (say, 95% confidence) to assess the condition
    of one of these frames, or whether you'd need to check alignment too to
    be sure.

    The string test for rear dropout centering is a good ballpark test,
    but bear in mind that many older aluminum frames were found to be
    misaligned when new due to the warpage induced in heat-treating the
    frame. Thus, you could have an uncrashed aluminum-frame bike (perhaps
    even with a major name brand involved) that has never been straight
    since day one. Sometimes, the bike will ride just fine, and sometimes
    it will ride just well enough to outlive the interest of its first
    owner. Units made from the newer 7005 tubing should be straight to
    start out if they were made properly since that material doesn't get
    heat treated after fabrication. In any event, checking a bike for
    frame damage before putting it up for sale is simply prudent and
    polite regardless of whether it's steel or aluminum.

    --
    My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via e-mail.
    Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  3. Werehatrack said:


    The string test for rear dropout centering is a good ballpark test,
    but bear in mind that many older aluminum frames were found to be
    misaligned when new due to the warpage induced in heat-treating the
    frame. Thus, you could have an uncrashed aluminum-frame bike


    (perhaps

    Quoted message said:

    even with a major name brand involved) that has never been straight
    since day one. Sometimes, the bike will ride just fine, and


    sometimes

    Quoted message said:

    it will ride just well enough to outlive the interest of its first
    owner.

    I'd be interested in some evidence of this "never straight since day
    one." How often is a new Cannondale out of alignment? How do you know
    this?

    I ask because, according to what I've heard, Cannondale has always used
    alignment fixtures to re-align the important points on the frame after
    heat treating - those points being the dropouts, bottom bracket, head
    tube, seat tube, brake attachement points, etc. (At least when I
    bought mine, they did not bother to perfectly straighten the tubes
    between those points.)

    They were able to do this realignment because after the quenching stage
    in the "precipitation hardening" heat treat, the aluminum is dead soft
    and easy to realign. It gains its hardness and strength only after the
    "aging" part of that heat treatment.

    I haven't heard of any problems with their scheme, assuming one can
    accept a seat stay that's not cosmetically straight. If you have heard
    of problems, I'd be interested.

  4. may have said:


    Werehatrack said:


    The string test for rear dropout centering is a good ballpark test,
    but bear in mind that many older aluminum frames were found to be
    misaligned when new due to the warpage induced in heat-treating the
    frame. Thus, you could have an uncrashed aluminum-frame bike


    (perhaps

    Quoted message said:

    even with a major name brand involved) that has never been straight
    since day one. Sometimes, the bike will ride just fine, and


    sometimes

    Quoted message said:

    it will ride just well enough to outlive the interest of its first
    owner.

    I'd be interested in some evidence of this "never straight since day
    one." How often is a new Cannondale out of alignment? How do you know
    this?

    Early on, it was reportedly common enough with that make that they had
    numerous returns, based on the statements of a couple of CDale
    dealers, at least one of them here in this newsgroup. I ran across a
    CDale that was likely an undetected example of such not too long ago;
    an acquaintance dropped by with a an older near-mint unit with an
    aluminum frame that he'd just picked up for very little, and when I
    looked at it, something seemed odd; one piece of string later, it
    became obvious that the seat tube was about 6mm off the centerline of
    the frame. There wasn't a scratch or dent anywhere on the bike, and
    it rode well, so he decided to ignore it. The owner of a local store
    that specializes in used bikes had also advised caution in evaluating
    used aluminum-frame bikes for purchase when I was shopping for a
    mountain bike a couple of years ago; he openly warned that there were
    some which were warped to begin with, and the misalignment wasn't
    always caught by the assemblers. That said, he also noted that it
    wasn't common...but it shouldn't be ignored as a possible issue,
    either.

    Quoted message said:

    I ask because, according to what I've heard, Cannondale has always used
    alignment fixtures to re-align the important points on the frame after
    heat treating, those points being the dropouts, bottom bracket, head
    tube, seat tube, brake attachement points, etc. (At least when I
    bought mine, they did not bother to perfectly straighten the tubes
    between those points.)

    More likely, they *couldn't* perfectly straighten them after the
    heat-treat process.

    Quoted message said:

    They were able to do this realignment because after the quenching stage
    in the "precipitation hardening" heat treat, the aluminum is dead soft
    and easy to realign. It gains its hardness and strength only after the
    "aging" part of that heat treatment.

    Yeah, aluminum is a whole different thing from steel when it comes to
    hardening.

    Quoted message said:

    I haven't heard of any problems with their scheme, assuming one can
    accept a seat stay that's not cosmetically straight. If you have heard
    of problems, I'd be interested.

    The measures that you describe were evidently adopted after they
    discovered that they'd already shipped a bunch of frames that had
    problems. Yes, later units have been (from what I've heard) very good
    in those areas, but they definitely made some that had all sorts of
    alignment issues that weren't fixed before the frames got out the
    door. Even after they got the alignment of the critical points nailed
    down, as you noted, they still were producing frames which had visible
    snakiness in tubes which varied from one frame to another. ISTR one
    comment from a CDale dealer that they would point out the variations
    as being a feature; each frame was really unique. It must have made
    for some interesting conversations.

    I've never seen a CDale with a non-straight seat tube or top tube that
    wasn't due to a collision, though. I've noticed seat stays and chain
    stays with "artistic features" a number of times, but only the one
    personal instance of a frame with something out of whack where it
    could have mattered, and even then, the buyer didn't seem to find the
    result objectionable. Still, if I were looking at a used bike to buy,
    I'd check it anyway, just in case. If it's something that's going to
    make a difference, it doesn't matter whether a fault was present for a
    day, a week, or a decade; it's still better to find it before laying
    the money down. (In the case of that off-center CDale, though, the
    guy would have had a decent deal even if the frame was junk; he paid
    all of $60 for it, and the wheels had no wear on the brake surfaces.)

    --
    My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via e-mail.
    Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.