The recent posting about "is this bike rubbish" prompted me to see
what
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
else was on offer; among them-
THIS ITEM RETAILS FOR 569 POUNDS !!!
So why has it got frame shifters and not even a proper road rear
mech?
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
looks great on first (very undetailed) inspection though.
err scuse me, Frame shifters != rubbish/cheap
OK but the rest of it; look at his other products, would you buy a bike with the same brand name as a cordless drill/whatever. Can't believe they are fetching nearly 200, and it hasn't even finished yet. The other Qentis one is pure 1970's.
The recent posting about "is this bike rubbish" prompted me to see what else was on offer; among them-
THIS ITEM RETAILS FOR 569 POUNDS !!!
Just because someone on ebay claims the junk they're offloading 'retails for [censored] pounds' doesn't mean they've ever sold one at that price or that it would represent any sort of value for money at that price. It's puff.
Quoted message said:
So why has it got frame shifters and not even a proper road rear mech? looks great on first (very undetailed) inspection though.
Lance Armstrong uses a frame shifter on one of his race bikes (hillclimb, I think). It's lighter and mechanically less complex. There's nothing wrong with frame shifters. AIUI, the fashion for STIs and Ergos largely comes from the fact that if you drop your hand to the down tube everyone else in the peloton can see you're about to change gear, and so has an extra bit of time to react when you're trying to make a break.
The recent posting about "is this bike rubbish" prompted me to see what else was on offer; among them-
THIS ITEM RETAILS FOR 569 POUNDS !!!
Just because someone on ebay claims the junk they're offloading 'retails for [censored] pounds' doesn't mean they've ever sold one at that price or that it would represent any sort of value for money at that price. It's puff.
Quoted message said:
So why has it got frame shifters and not even a proper road rear mech? looks great on first (very undetailed) inspection though.
Lance Armstrong uses a frame shifter on one of his race bikes (hillclimb, I think). It's lighter and mechanically less complex. There's nothing wrong with frame shifters. AIUI, the fashion for STIs and Ergos largely comes from the fact that if you drop your hand to the down tube everyone else in the peloton can see you're about to change gear, and so has an extra bit of time to react when you're trying to make a break.
I am more cynical. STis and ergos were invented to sell more brake and gear controls IMO. DT levers hardly ever get broken, can't sell many of them. Make combined units and put them in a position to get damaged in every crash. Ker-ching.
I am more cynical. STis and ergos were invented to sell more brake and gear controls IMO. DT levers hardly ever get broken, can't sell many of them. Make combined units and put them in a position to get damaged in every crash. Ker-ching.
Have you ever compared a sprint finish using STI versus using DT shifters? There's your reason for STI - you can't sprint at 100% and then change up with DT shifters.